Dietary choline and betaine intake in relation to psychological disorders in adults.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
British Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-06-14 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1017/S000711452510367X
Shervin Kazeminejad, Zahra Moradmand, Farnaz Shahdadian, Zahra Hajhashemy, Parisa Rouhani, Parvane Saneei
{"title":"Dietary choline and betaine intake in relation to psychological disorders in adults.","authors":"Shervin Kazeminejad, Zahra Moradmand, Farnaz Shahdadian, Zahra Hajhashemy, Parisa Rouhani, Parvane Saneei","doi":"10.1017/S000711452510367X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dietary choline and betaine, suggested as neuroprotective nutrients, have not been sufficiently studied in relation to psychological disorders. This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary choline and betaine and common psychological disorders (depression, anxiety and psychological distress) among Iranian adults. Using a multistage cluster random sampling method, 533 middle-aged adults were included in this cross-sectional study. Dietary intakes were assessed using a validated semi-quantitative 168-item FFQ. Depression, anxiety and psychological distress were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General Health Questionnaire, both validated for the Iranian population. Binary logistic regression was applied to explore the associations. Mean age of participants was 42·6 (sd 11·14) years; of whom 18·9, 5·1 and 33·4 % had depression, anxiety and psychological distress, respectively. In the crude model, the highest intake of choline was negatively associated with depression (OR = 0·52; 95 % CI: 0·30, 0·91), anxiety (OR = 0·38; 95 % CI: 0·14, 0·99) and distress (OR = 0·60; 95 % CI: 0·38, 0·94) compared with the lowest intake. After considering all confounders, such associations remained significant in the case of depression (OR = 0·51; 95 % CI: 0·26, 0·98) but not for anxiety and distress. Additionally, there was no significant association between betaine intake and odds of depression, anxiety or distress in both crude and adjusted models. This study suggests a protective association between choline intake and depression, while no significant relation was found in the case of anxiety and distress. Betaine intake was not related to psychological disorders. Further prospective studies are crucial to replicate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1431-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452510367X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dietary choline and betaine, suggested as neuroprotective nutrients, have not been sufficiently studied in relation to psychological disorders. This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary choline and betaine and common psychological disorders (depression, anxiety and psychological distress) among Iranian adults. Using a multistage cluster random sampling method, 533 middle-aged adults were included in this cross-sectional study. Dietary intakes were assessed using a validated semi-quantitative 168-item FFQ. Depression, anxiety and psychological distress were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General Health Questionnaire, both validated for the Iranian population. Binary logistic regression was applied to explore the associations. Mean age of participants was 42·6 (sd 11·14) years; of whom 18·9, 5·1 and 33·4 % had depression, anxiety and psychological distress, respectively. In the crude model, the highest intake of choline was negatively associated with depression (OR = 0·52; 95 % CI: 0·30, 0·91), anxiety (OR = 0·38; 95 % CI: 0·14, 0·99) and distress (OR = 0·60; 95 % CI: 0·38, 0·94) compared with the lowest intake. After considering all confounders, such associations remained significant in the case of depression (OR = 0·51; 95 % CI: 0·26, 0·98) but not for anxiety and distress. Additionally, there was no significant association between betaine intake and odds of depression, anxiety or distress in both crude and adjusted models. This study suggests a protective association between choline intake and depression, while no significant relation was found in the case of anxiety and distress. Betaine intake was not related to psychological disorders. Further prospective studies are crucial to replicate these findings.

膳食胆碱和甜菜碱摄入与成人心理障碍的关系。
膳食胆碱和甜菜碱被认为是神经保护营养素,但与心理障碍的关系尚未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在调查伊朗成年人饮食胆碱和甜菜碱与常见心理障碍(抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰)之间的关系。采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法,对533名中年人进行横断面调查。膳食摄入量评估采用半定量的168项食物频率问卷。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表和一般健康问卷对抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰进行了评估,这两种问卷都针对伊朗人口进行了验证。采用二元逻辑回归分析其相关性。参与者平均年龄为42.6±11.14岁;其中18.9%、5.1和33.4%分别有抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰。粗模型中,最高胆碱摄入量与抑郁呈负相关(OR=0.52;95%CI: 0.30, 0.91),焦虑(OR=0.38;95%CI: 0.14, 0.99)和痛苦(OR=0.60;95%可信区间:0.38,0.94)与最低摄入量相比。在考虑了所有混杂因素后,这种关联在抑郁症的情况下仍然显著(OR=0.51;95% CI: 0.26, 0.98),但对焦虑和痛苦没有影响。此外,在粗模型和调整模型中,甜菜碱摄入量与抑郁、焦虑或痛苦的几率之间没有显著关联。这项研究表明,胆碱摄入与抑郁之间存在保护性联系,而在焦虑和痛苦的情况下没有发现显著的关系。甜菜碱摄入与心理障碍无关。进一步的前瞻性研究对于重复这些发现至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信