Multidisciplinary Management Improves Re-Admission, Major Amputation, and Mortality Rates in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Chi-Wei Chiu, Wen-Teng Yao, Chieh-Ming Yu, Yu-Fan Chen, Ya-Shu Chan, Hsuan-Yu Huang, An-Li Lee, Ying-Chun Liu, Shu-Tien Huang, Liong-Rung Liu, Yueh-Hung Lin, Kung-Chen Ho, Chia-Meng Yu, Wen-Chen Huang, Kwang-Yi Tung, Ming-Feng Tsai
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Management Improves Re-Admission, Major Amputation, and Mortality Rates in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.","authors":"Chi-Wei Chiu, Wen-Teng Yao, Chieh-Ming Yu, Yu-Fan Chen, Ya-Shu Chan, Hsuan-Yu Huang, An-Li Lee, Ying-Chun Liu, Shu-Tien Huang, Liong-Rung Liu, Yueh-Hung Lin, Kung-Chen Ho, Chia-Meng Yu, Wen-Chen Huang, Kwang-Yi Tung, Ming-Feng Tsai","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). <b>Approach:</b> A multidisciplinary diabetic foot care center (MDDFCC) was opened at our institution in August 2018. Outcomes of DFU treatment, including re-admission, amputation, and mortality rates, were compared before and after opening the MDDFCC. <b>Results:</b> Patients seen after the MDDFCC was opened had a lower risk of 1-year re-admission (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.697, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.387-0.988), 1-year major amputation (HR = 0.447, 95% CI: 0.091-0.984), and 1-year disease-specific mortality (HR = 0.277, 95% CI: 0.105-0.730). PEDIS score (HR = 2.343, 95% CI: 1.264-2.971), history of dialysis (HR = 1.858, 95% CI: 1.258-4.053), and consultation with a physiatrist (HR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.172-0.788), orthopedist (HR = 0.105, 95% CI: 0.042-0.261), or social worker (HR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.082-0.871) were associated with 1-year major amputation. One-year major amputation (HR = 2.636, 95% CI: 1.586-4.570), age (HR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.051-1.140), and C-reactive protein level (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.008-1.098) were associated with 1-year disease-specific mortality. <b>Innovation:</b> Plastic surgeons received patients at the MDDFCC, with active participation by all contributing members. This arrangement brought advantages, including more aggressive and timely surgical intervention, a more timely and higher rate of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and equally robust integrated medical care by all other members. <b>Conclusion:</b> The MDDFCC approach may be a potential organizational structure with for treating DFUs, resulting in significant improvements in outcomes of DFU including a lower re-admission, amputation, and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Approach: A multidisciplinary diabetic foot care center (MDDFCC) was opened at our institution in August 2018. Outcomes of DFU treatment, including re-admission, amputation, and mortality rates, were compared before and after opening the MDDFCC. Results: Patients seen after the MDDFCC was opened had a lower risk of 1-year re-admission (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.697, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.387-0.988), 1-year major amputation (HR = 0.447, 95% CI: 0.091-0.984), and 1-year disease-specific mortality (HR = 0.277, 95% CI: 0.105-0.730). PEDIS score (HR = 2.343, 95% CI: 1.264-2.971), history of dialysis (HR = 1.858, 95% CI: 1.258-4.053), and consultation with a physiatrist (HR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.172-0.788), orthopedist (HR = 0.105, 95% CI: 0.042-0.261), or social worker (HR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.082-0.871) were associated with 1-year major amputation. One-year major amputation (HR = 2.636, 95% CI: 1.586-4.570), age (HR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.051-1.140), and C-reactive protein level (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.008-1.098) were associated with 1-year disease-specific mortality. Innovation: Plastic surgeons received patients at the MDDFCC, with active participation by all contributing members. This arrangement brought advantages, including more aggressive and timely surgical intervention, a more timely and higher rate of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and equally robust integrated medical care by all other members. Conclusion: The MDDFCC approach may be a potential organizational structure with for treating DFUs, resulting in significant improvements in outcomes of DFU including a lower re-admission, amputation, and mortality.

多学科管理改善糖尿病足溃疡患者的再入院率、大截肢率和死亡率。
目的:本研究的目的是评估多学科团队(MDT)方法在糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)治疗中的影响。方法:多学科糖尿病足护理中心(MDDFCC)于2018年8月在我院开业。比较打开MDDFCC前后DFU治疗的结果,包括再入院、截肢和死亡率。结果:打开MDDFCC后就诊的患者1年再入院(风险比[HR] = 0.697, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.387-0.988)、1年主要截肢(HR = 0.447, 95% CI: 0.091-0.984)和1年疾病特异性死亡率(HR = 0.277, 95% CI: 0.105-0.730)的风险较低。PEDIS评分(HR = 2.343, 95% CI: 1.264-2.971)、透析史(HR = 1.858, 95% CI: 1.258-4.053)和咨询物理医生(HR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.172-0.788)、骨科医生(HR = 0.105, 95% CI: 0.042-0.261)或社会工作者(HR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.082-0.871)与1年主要截肢相关。1年主要截肢(HR = 2.636, 95% CI: 1.586-4.570)、年龄(HR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.051-1.140)和c反应蛋白水平(HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.008-1.098)与1年疾病特异性死亡率相关。创新:在所有贡献成员的积极参与下,整形外科医生在MDDFCC接待患者。这种安排带来了优势,包括更积极和及时的手术干预,更及时和更高的经皮腔内血管成形术,以及所有其他成员同样强大的综合医疗服务。结论:MDDFCC方法可能是治疗DFU的一种潜在的组织结构,可显著改善DFU的预后,包括降低再入院率、截肢率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信