A Scoping Review on the Status of Clinical Simulation in Healthcare Education in the Philippines.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v59i6.11554
Christopher S Constantino, Rowena F Genuino, Nicole Katrina P Kilem, Glenmarie Angelica S Perias, Gere Ganixon T Ang
{"title":"A Scoping Review on the Status of Clinical Simulation in Healthcare Education in the Philippines.","authors":"Christopher S Constantino, Rowena F Genuino, Nicole Katrina P Kilem, Glenmarie Angelica S Perias, Gere Ganixon T Ang","doi":"10.47895/amp.v59i6.11554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation immerses learners in guided replications of real-life experiences. Simulation-based learning in the health profession allows trainees and professionals to practice skills in a controlled environment using various modalities, enhancing patient safety and minimizing clinical errors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the profile of Philippine studies on clinical simulation in healthcare professional education and assess the methodological quality of these studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of studies on clinical simulation studies in healthcare education in the Philippines. We followed the methods for scoping review and reported using the PRISMA Scoping review checklist. We searched for relevant studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Herdin, and Cochrane) as of May 17, 2024, and summarized descriptive data on the characteristics of the study, population, clinical simulation technique, and outcomes, using graphical summaries and tables. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 studies mostly published in the 2020s (7), by faculty as main author (9), with hospital affiliation (10), single-center (11), setting in NCR (11), analytic (10), medical field (10), educational purpose (7), using task trainers (5), low- to medium-fidelity (11), with technical competencies (mostly skills) as desired outcome (9), median sample size of 40, and including mostly postgraduate level participants (7). There was moderate methodological quality (median MMERSQI score, 51 [range, 40, 77] with the 'type of data' item being highly reported and 'validity of instrument tool' item poorly reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed gaps in methodological rigor, study design, and fidelity of simulation techniques in healthcare education in the Philippines highlight opportunities for advancing the field. Future research should aim to address these gaps, particularly by increasing the use of RCTs, enhancing the validity of measurement tools, and incorporating comprehensive simulation components.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 6","pages":"9-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v59i6.11554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation immerses learners in guided replications of real-life experiences. Simulation-based learning in the health profession allows trainees and professionals to practice skills in a controlled environment using various modalities, enhancing patient safety and minimizing clinical errors.

Objective: To describe the profile of Philippine studies on clinical simulation in healthcare professional education and assess the methodological quality of these studies.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of studies on clinical simulation studies in healthcare education in the Philippines. We followed the methods for scoping review and reported using the PRISMA Scoping review checklist. We searched for relevant studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Herdin, and Cochrane) as of May 17, 2024, and summarized descriptive data on the characteristics of the study, population, clinical simulation technique, and outcomes, using graphical summaries and tables. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI).

Results: We included 13 studies mostly published in the 2020s (7), by faculty as main author (9), with hospital affiliation (10), single-center (11), setting in NCR (11), analytic (10), medical field (10), educational purpose (7), using task trainers (5), low- to medium-fidelity (11), with technical competencies (mostly skills) as desired outcome (9), median sample size of 40, and including mostly postgraduate level participants (7). There was moderate methodological quality (median MMERSQI score, 51 [range, 40, 77] with the 'type of data' item being highly reported and 'validity of instrument tool' item poorly reported.

Conclusion: The observed gaps in methodological rigor, study design, and fidelity of simulation techniques in healthcare education in the Philippines highlight opportunities for advancing the field. Future research should aim to address these gaps, particularly by increasing the use of RCTs, enhancing the validity of measurement tools, and incorporating comprehensive simulation components.

菲律宾医疗保健教育中临床模拟现状的范围综述。
背景:模拟使学习者沉浸在现实生活经验的指导复制中。卫生专业中基于模拟的学习使受训人员和专业人员能够在受控环境中使用各种方式练习技能,从而提高患者安全并最大限度地减少临床错误。目的:描述菲律宾在医疗保健专业教育中临床模拟的研究概况,并评估这些研究的方法学质量。方法:我们对菲律宾医疗保健教育的临床模拟研究进行了范围审查。我们遵循范围审查的方法,并使用PRISMA范围审查检查表进行报告。我们检索了截至2024年5月17日的电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、CENTRAL、Herdin和Cochrane)中的相关研究,并使用图形摘要和表格总结了研究特征、人群、临床模拟技术和结果的描述性数据。我们使用改良医学教育研究质量工具(MMERSQI)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。结果:我们纳入了13项研究,主要发表于20世纪20年代(7),以教师为主要作者(9),医院隶属关系(10),单中心(11),NCR(11),分析(10),医学领域(10),教育目的(7),使用任务培训师(5),中低保真度(11),以技术能力(主要是技能)为期望结果(9),中位样本量为40,主要包括研究生水平的参与者(7)。方法学质量中等(MMERSQI得分中位数为51分[范围,40,77],“数据类型”项目被高度报道,而“工具工具的有效性”项目被低报道。结论:观察到的差距在方法学严谨性,研究设计,和逼真的模拟技术在菲律宾的医疗保健教育突出了推进该领域的机会。未来的研究应致力于解决这些差距,特别是通过增加随机对照试验的使用,提高测量工具的有效性,并纳入全面的模拟组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信