A Scoping Review of Worldwide Patent Applications in Anatomical Education (2018-2022).

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v59i6.7687
Rowena F Genuino, Rafael C Bundoc, Florida F Taladtad, Kevin L Ocampo, Gere Ganixon T Ang, Joseph Daniel S Timbol, Christopher S Constantino
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Worldwide Patent Applications in Anatomical Education (2018-2022).","authors":"Rowena F Genuino, Rafael C Bundoc, Florida F Taladtad, Kevin L Ocampo, Gere Ganixon T Ang, Joseph Daniel S Timbol, Christopher S Constantino","doi":"10.47895/amp.v59i6.7687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Anatomical education utilizes mainly cadaver dissection, but it also depends on innovations such as novel preservation techniques, simulation models, and virtual dissection apps. There is no review on anatomical patents. This study aimed to review the worldwide landscape of existing patents on anatomical education to identify gaps and opportunities for utilization and further innovations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review for inventions, utility models, and industrial design applications on anatomical education. We searched the following databases as of December 31, 2022 (WIPO Patentscope, Espacenet, and Derwent). We deduplicated the records, screened them for eligibility, and extracted information on characteristics of the patent application and applicant. We computed frequency and percentage according to country, type of applicant, number of inventors, type of patent, scope of patent, purpose of patent, organ system, status of patent, and time to patent granting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 667 merged records from the initial search, we removed 312 duplicates, excluded 97 records, and included 258 reports in the review. The median number of patent applications per year was 58 (range, 32, 61). Majority of the applications were from China and USA (36.0 and 34.9%, respectively), national in scope (62.8%), industry as applicant (49.6%), inventions (77.5%), usable beyond anatomy (70.9%), physical models (53.1%) and with pending status (63.6%). The median time to granting for 65 patents was 316 days (range, 40 to 1568).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the period 2018-2022, there were 258 patent applications related to anatomical education, both as a basic science and in clinical applications, were mostly inventions, applied for by industry, contributed by US and China, only national in scope, physical 3D models (mostly musculoskeletal, head/neck and sensory organs, and whole body), and usable beyond basic anatomy. The majority of patent applications are still pending with only 65 granted patents. Plastinated specimens, and the urinary, reproductive, and pulmonary organ system models were least represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 6","pages":"24-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v59i6.7687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Anatomical education utilizes mainly cadaver dissection, but it also depends on innovations such as novel preservation techniques, simulation models, and virtual dissection apps. There is no review on anatomical patents. This study aimed to review the worldwide landscape of existing patents on anatomical education to identify gaps and opportunities for utilization and further innovations.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review for inventions, utility models, and industrial design applications on anatomical education. We searched the following databases as of December 31, 2022 (WIPO Patentscope, Espacenet, and Derwent). We deduplicated the records, screened them for eligibility, and extracted information on characteristics of the patent application and applicant. We computed frequency and percentage according to country, type of applicant, number of inventors, type of patent, scope of patent, purpose of patent, organ system, status of patent, and time to patent granting.

Results: Out of 667 merged records from the initial search, we removed 312 duplicates, excluded 97 records, and included 258 reports in the review. The median number of patent applications per year was 58 (range, 32, 61). Majority of the applications were from China and USA (36.0 and 34.9%, respectively), national in scope (62.8%), industry as applicant (49.6%), inventions (77.5%), usable beyond anatomy (70.9%), physical models (53.1%) and with pending status (63.6%). The median time to granting for 65 patents was 316 days (range, 40 to 1568).

Conclusion: For the period 2018-2022, there were 258 patent applications related to anatomical education, both as a basic science and in clinical applications, were mostly inventions, applied for by industry, contributed by US and China, only national in scope, physical 3D models (mostly musculoskeletal, head/neck and sensory organs, and whole body), and usable beyond basic anatomy. The majority of patent applications are still pending with only 65 granted patents. Plastinated specimens, and the urinary, reproductive, and pulmonary organ system models were least represented.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全球解剖学教育专利申请范围综述(2018-2022)。
背景与目的:解剖教育主要利用尸体解剖,但也依赖于新的保存技术、模拟模型和虚拟解剖应用等创新。没有关于解剖专利的综述。本研究旨在回顾世界范围内现有的解剖学教育专利,以确定利用和进一步创新的差距和机会。方法:对解剖学教育中的发明、实用新型和工业设计应用进行范围综述。我们检索了截至2022年12月31日的以下数据库(WIPO Patentscope、Espacenet和Derwent)。我们删除了这些记录,筛选了它们的合格性,并提取了专利申请和申请人的特征信息。我们根据国家、申请人类型、发明人数量、专利类型、专利范围、专利目的、机关制度、专利状态和专利授予时间来计算频率和百分比。结果:在最初检索的667条合并记录中,我们删除了312条重复记录,排除了97条记录,并纳入了258份报告。每年专利申请的中位数为58件(范围为32至61件)。大多数申请来自中国和美国(分别为36.0%和34.9%)、国家范围(62.8%)、作为申请人的行业(49.6%)、发明(77.5%)、解剖学以外的可用性(70.9%)、物理模型(53.1%)和待审状态(63.6%)。65项专利授予的中位时间为316天(范围为40至1568天)。结论:2018-2022年,解剖学教育相关专利申请258件,无论是基础科学还是临床应用,均以发明为主,由行业申请,美国和中国贡献,仅在全国范围内,物理3D模型(主要是肌肉骨骼、头颈和感觉器官以及全身),可用于基础解剖学之外。大多数专利申请仍在审理中,只有65项专利获得批准。塑化标本、泌尿、生殖和肺器官系统模型最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信