Tatiana Svorenova, Luigi M Romito, Ahmet Kaymak, Eoin Mulroy, Laura Cif, Elena Moro, Kirsten E Zeuner, Simone Zittel, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Doreen Gruber, Liesanne Centen, Alberto Albanese, Miriama Ostrozovicova, Vladimir Han, Veronika Magocova, Kamil Knorovsky, Aurelia Kollova, Barbara Garavaglia, Nico Golfrè-Andreasi, Chiara Reale, Alberto Mazzoni, Giovanna Zorzi, Roberto Eleopra, Vincenzo Levi, Thomas Foltynie, Patricia Limousin, Harith Akram, Ludvic Zrinzo, Francesca Magrinelli, David Murphy, Henry Houlden, Manju A Kurian, Claudio Baiata, Steffen Paschen, Katja Lohmann, Jens Volkmann, Wolfgang Hamel, Michael T Barbe, Martje E van Egmond, Maj Tijssen, Lubos Ambro, Veronika Jurkova, Robert Jech, Petra Havrankova, Juliane Winkelmann, Michael Zech, Matej Skorvanek
{"title":"Deep Brain Stimulation for VPS16-Related Dystonia: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Tatiana Svorenova, Luigi M Romito, Ahmet Kaymak, Eoin Mulroy, Laura Cif, Elena Moro, Kirsten E Zeuner, Simone Zittel, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Doreen Gruber, Liesanne Centen, Alberto Albanese, Miriama Ostrozovicova, Vladimir Han, Veronika Magocova, Kamil Knorovsky, Aurelia Kollova, Barbara Garavaglia, Nico Golfrè-Andreasi, Chiara Reale, Alberto Mazzoni, Giovanna Zorzi, Roberto Eleopra, Vincenzo Levi, Thomas Foltynie, Patricia Limousin, Harith Akram, Ludvic Zrinzo, Francesca Magrinelli, David Murphy, Henry Houlden, Manju A Kurian, Claudio Baiata, Steffen Paschen, Katja Lohmann, Jens Volkmann, Wolfgang Hamel, Michael T Barbe, Martje E van Egmond, Maj Tijssen, Lubos Ambro, Veronika Jurkova, Robert Jech, Petra Havrankova, Juliane Winkelmann, Michael Zech, Matej Skorvanek","doi":"10.1002/ana.27290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in an international cohort of patients with VPS16-related dystonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study collected preoperative and postoperative demographic, clinical, stimulation, genetic, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological data of medically refractory DYT-VPS16 patients with implanted DBS in 10 international centers. Motor symptoms and disability outcomes were assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale Motor (BFMDRS-M) and Disability (BFMDRS-D) scales. A cut-off threshold for considering response to DBS was set at 25% of BFMDRS-M improvement at the last follow-up (FU) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 26 participants (17 men, 65.4%). Age at dystonia onset and surgery was 17.8 ± 10.9 and 35.3 ± 14.8 years, respectively. At the last FU, 102.5 ± 57.3 months (range, 2-216), the mean BFMDRS-M improvement was 41.6 ± 37.3% (26/26 patients) and 34.8 ± 42.6% for the BFMDRS-D (23/26 patients). Most patients (19/26, 73%) were considered responders. Higher motor improvement was associated with stimulation of the ventroposterior portion of the internal globus pallidus. A significant inverse relationship was observed between improvement in BFMDRS-M at last FU, and the presence of spasticity (p = 0.027) and fixed skeletal deformities (p = 0.001) before surgery. Non-responders had a younger age at disease onset and at implantation, shorter disease duration at DBS surgery, and higher baseline BFMDRS scores.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>DBS was an effective treatment for three-quarters of patients with pathogenic VPS16 variants in our cohort. Mean motor improvement was most pronounced at the 1-year FU, but persisted at the last FU despite disease progression. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in an international cohort of patients with VPS16-related dystonia.
Methods: This observational study collected preoperative and postoperative demographic, clinical, stimulation, genetic, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological data of medically refractory DYT-VPS16 patients with implanted DBS in 10 international centers. Motor symptoms and disability outcomes were assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale Motor (BFMDRS-M) and Disability (BFMDRS-D) scales. A cut-off threshold for considering response to DBS was set at 25% of BFMDRS-M improvement at the last follow-up (FU) compared to baseline.
Results: The cohort consisted of 26 participants (17 men, 65.4%). Age at dystonia onset and surgery was 17.8 ± 10.9 and 35.3 ± 14.8 years, respectively. At the last FU, 102.5 ± 57.3 months (range, 2-216), the mean BFMDRS-M improvement was 41.6 ± 37.3% (26/26 patients) and 34.8 ± 42.6% for the BFMDRS-D (23/26 patients). Most patients (19/26, 73%) were considered responders. Higher motor improvement was associated with stimulation of the ventroposterior portion of the internal globus pallidus. A significant inverse relationship was observed between improvement in BFMDRS-M at last FU, and the presence of spasticity (p = 0.027) and fixed skeletal deformities (p = 0.001) before surgery. Non-responders had a younger age at disease onset and at implantation, shorter disease duration at DBS surgery, and higher baseline BFMDRS scores.
Interpretation: DBS was an effective treatment for three-quarters of patients with pathogenic VPS16 variants in our cohort. Mean motor improvement was most pronounced at the 1-year FU, but persisted at the last FU despite disease progression. ANN NEUROL 2025.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.