Bizhou Zhu, 朱碧洲, Harold J. Bradbury, Thomas I. Marquand, Angus Fotherby, Caroline M. Daunt, Josephine A. Clegg, Beth Williams, Jonathan D. Todd, Michael J. Bickle, Fiona Llewellyn-Beard, Alexandra V. Turchyn
{"title":"Seasonal Influence on Subsurface Rates of Microbial Sulfate Reduction and Sulfur Isotope Fractionation in Coastal Sediments","authors":"Bizhou Zhu, 朱碧洲, Harold J. Bradbury, Thomas I. Marquand, Angus Fotherby, Caroline M. Daunt, Josephine A. Clegg, Beth Williams, Jonathan D. Todd, Michael J. Bickle, Fiona Llewellyn-Beard, Alexandra V. Turchyn","doi":"10.1029/2025GB008558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction is often preserved in the mineral pyrite (FeS<sub>2</sub>), which has been used to reconstruct the biogeochemical sulfur cycle and redox geochemistry of the oceans over the Earth history. Understanding what controls the preserved sulfur isotopic composition of pyrite is therefore of paramount importance, but it has been difficult to deconvolve the influence of environmental changes from changes in sedimentation rate. We present a 16-month record of pore fluid geochemical profiles with in situ sampling apparatus installed in coastal sediments, one of which is dominated by microbial sulfate reduction and the other dominated by bacterial iron reduction. Our data include monthly sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>) and chloride concentrations (Cl<sup>−</sup>), dissolved iron concentrations (Fe<sup>2+</sup>), and the sulfur isotopic composition of dissolved sulfate (δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>SO4</sub>) up to 36 cm below the sediment-water interface. We use a reactive transport model to determine the expressed sulfur isotopic fractionation factor for each month and a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate net sulfate flux into the sediment based on pore fluid profiles from the sulfidic sediment. Net rates of sulfate reduction in the sulfidic sediment vary by three orders of magnitude over the seasonal cycle and are positively correlated with air temperature. The expressed sulfur isotope fractionation factor varies between 20 and 70‰ and reaches the thermodynamic limit in the colder months. Our data suggest that the correlation between temperature and the subsurface microbial sulfur biogeochemical cycle should be considered when interpreting sulfur isotope ratios in pyrite over Earth history.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GB008558","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction is often preserved in the mineral pyrite (FeS2), which has been used to reconstruct the biogeochemical sulfur cycle and redox geochemistry of the oceans over the Earth history. Understanding what controls the preserved sulfur isotopic composition of pyrite is therefore of paramount importance, but it has been difficult to deconvolve the influence of environmental changes from changes in sedimentation rate. We present a 16-month record of pore fluid geochemical profiles with in situ sampling apparatus installed in coastal sediments, one of which is dominated by microbial sulfate reduction and the other dominated by bacterial iron reduction. Our data include monthly sulfate (SO42−) and chloride concentrations (Cl−), dissolved iron concentrations (Fe2+), and the sulfur isotopic composition of dissolved sulfate (δ34SSO4) up to 36 cm below the sediment-water interface. We use a reactive transport model to determine the expressed sulfur isotopic fractionation factor for each month and a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate net sulfate flux into the sediment based on pore fluid profiles from the sulfidic sediment. Net rates of sulfate reduction in the sulfidic sediment vary by three orders of magnitude over the seasonal cycle and are positively correlated with air temperature. The expressed sulfur isotope fractionation factor varies between 20 and 70‰ and reaches the thermodynamic limit in the colder months. Our data suggest that the correlation between temperature and the subsurface microbial sulfur biogeochemical cycle should be considered when interpreting sulfur isotope ratios in pyrite over Earth history.
期刊介绍:
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.