{"title":"Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Firms’ Knowledge Externalities and Appropriability in Innovation Performance","authors":"Min-Nan Chen;Yu-Hsuan Wang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3576148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the literature on the “paradox of knowledge externalities,” which encompasses two conflicting views regarding a firm’s innovation collaboration and spillover prevention. Drawing on original survey data from 300 Taiwanese knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms, we explore the extent to which KIBS firms’ behavioral elements in innovation collaboration (i.e., interactive knowledge search and noninteractive knowledge search) and unwanted spillovers prevention (i.e., formal and informal appropriability) affect their innovation performance. Specifically, we predict that KIBS firm’s interactive knowledge search exhibits a U-shaped relationship with innovation performance, whereas KIBS’s noninteractive knowledge search exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance. These curvilinear relationships are contingent on whether the KIBS firm employs formal and informal appropriability that consider distinct aspects of innovation protection and value appropriation during its knowledge search. By reconciling the conflicting views in the existing literature, we provide a nuanced framework for understanding the extent to which KIBS firms strategically manage knowledge externalities to secure private benefits. Finally, we conclude with theoretical and managerial implications that underscore the critical role of managing knowledge externalities to maximize privately-owned innovation performance in KIBS firms.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"2363-2380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11024225/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We revisit the literature on the “paradox of knowledge externalities,” which encompasses two conflicting views regarding a firm’s innovation collaboration and spillover prevention. Drawing on original survey data from 300 Taiwanese knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms, we explore the extent to which KIBS firms’ behavioral elements in innovation collaboration (i.e., interactive knowledge search and noninteractive knowledge search) and unwanted spillovers prevention (i.e., formal and informal appropriability) affect their innovation performance. Specifically, we predict that KIBS firm’s interactive knowledge search exhibits a U-shaped relationship with innovation performance, whereas KIBS’s noninteractive knowledge search exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance. These curvilinear relationships are contingent on whether the KIBS firm employs formal and informal appropriability that consider distinct aspects of innovation protection and value appropriation during its knowledge search. By reconciling the conflicting views in the existing literature, we provide a nuanced framework for understanding the extent to which KIBS firms strategically manage knowledge externalities to secure private benefits. Finally, we conclude with theoretical and managerial implications that underscore the critical role of managing knowledge externalities to maximize privately-owned innovation performance in KIBS firms.
期刊介绍:
Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.