Linsey Eldridge , Mishka Kohli Cira , Kalina Duncan , Leslie Given , Lewis Foxhall , Darya Kizub , Clayton Richards , Karin Hohman
{"title":"Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO for national cancer control plan implementation in low- and middle-income countries","authors":"Linsey Eldridge , Mishka Kohli Cira , Kalina Duncan , Leslie Given , Lewis Foxhall , Darya Kizub , Clayton Richards , Karin Hohman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) ECHO uses a technology-enabled learning model for knowledge exchange on National Cancer Control Plans (NCCP) implementation strategies for low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the use of this platform to bring together Ministry of Health-led, transdisciplinary teams in monthly, one-hour sessions with experts and peer presentations between 2020 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pre-post mixed-methods design was used. Baseline and endpoint surveys (41/90, 46 %) measured changes in self-reported knowledge and confidence related to 12 strategies for NCCP implementation based on a four-point Likert scale. Comparisons were done using a paired T-test. Seven post-focus group discussions (FGDs) (6/12 countries, 50 %) captured the perceived utility of ECHO for implementing NCCP priorities. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, double-coded, and underwent thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents reported high satisfaction with the curriculum, presentations, and format of the program; however, internet connectivity was a challenge, and duration was identified as an area for improvement. Average self-reported knowledge of and confidence using all 12 strategies increased significantly between pre- and post-surveys (p < 0.0001). Along with expert presentation, the peer-to-peer learning through case-based discussion enhanced their learning experience and ensured that the content was relevant. Some participants recommended incorporating additional one-on-one technical assistance during the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Study findings suggest this interactive, bidirectional knowledge exchange approach can be effective for improving knowledge and capacity for non-clinical, system-focused areas such as cancer control planning and policy implementation. Further study is warranted to understand how cancer planners utilize their learnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) ECHO uses a technology-enabled learning model for knowledge exchange on National Cancer Control Plans (NCCP) implementation strategies for low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the use of this platform to bring together Ministry of Health-led, transdisciplinary teams in monthly, one-hour sessions with experts and peer presentations between 2020 and 2023.
Methods
A pre-post mixed-methods design was used. Baseline and endpoint surveys (41/90, 46 %) measured changes in self-reported knowledge and confidence related to 12 strategies for NCCP implementation based on a four-point Likert scale. Comparisons were done using a paired T-test. Seven post-focus group discussions (FGDs) (6/12 countries, 50 %) captured the perceived utility of ECHO for implementing NCCP priorities. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, double-coded, and underwent thematic analysis.
Results
Respondents reported high satisfaction with the curriculum, presentations, and format of the program; however, internet connectivity was a challenge, and duration was identified as an area for improvement. Average self-reported knowledge of and confidence using all 12 strategies increased significantly between pre- and post-surveys (p < 0.0001). Along with expert presentation, the peer-to-peer learning through case-based discussion enhanced their learning experience and ensured that the content was relevant. Some participants recommended incorporating additional one-on-one technical assistance during the program.
Conclusion
Study findings suggest this interactive, bidirectional knowledge exchange approach can be effective for improving knowledge and capacity for non-clinical, system-focused areas such as cancer control planning and policy implementation. Further study is warranted to understand how cancer planners utilize their learnings.