Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO for national cancer control plan implementation in low- and middle-income countries

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Linsey Eldridge , Mishka Kohli Cira , Kalina Duncan , Leslie Given , Lewis Foxhall , Darya Kizub , Clayton Richards , Karin Hohman
{"title":"Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO for national cancer control plan implementation in low- and middle-income countries","authors":"Linsey Eldridge ,&nbsp;Mishka Kohli Cira ,&nbsp;Kalina Duncan ,&nbsp;Leslie Given ,&nbsp;Lewis Foxhall ,&nbsp;Darya Kizub ,&nbsp;Clayton Richards ,&nbsp;Karin Hohman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) ECHO uses a technology-enabled learning model for knowledge exchange on National Cancer Control Plans (NCCP) implementation strategies for low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the use of this platform to bring together Ministry of Health-led, transdisciplinary teams in monthly, one-hour sessions with experts and peer presentations between 2020 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pre-post mixed-methods design was used. Baseline and endpoint surveys (41/90, 46 %) measured changes in self-reported knowledge and confidence related to 12 strategies for NCCP implementation based on a four-point Likert scale. Comparisons were done using a paired T-test. Seven post-focus group discussions (FGDs) (6/12 countries, 50 %) captured the perceived utility of ECHO for implementing NCCP priorities. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, double-coded, and underwent thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents reported high satisfaction with the curriculum, presentations, and format of the program; however, internet connectivity was a challenge, and duration was identified as an area for improvement. Average self-reported knowledge of and confidence using all 12 strategies increased significantly between pre- and post-surveys (p &lt; 0.0001). Along with expert presentation, the peer-to-peer learning through case-based discussion enhanced their learning experience and ensured that the content was relevant. Some participants recommended incorporating additional one-on-one technical assistance during the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Study findings suggest this interactive, bidirectional knowledge exchange approach can be effective for improving knowledge and capacity for non-clinical, system-focused areas such as cancer control planning and policy implementation. Further study is warranted to understand how cancer planners utilize their learnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) ECHO uses a technology-enabled learning model for knowledge exchange on National Cancer Control Plans (NCCP) implementation strategies for low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the use of this platform to bring together Ministry of Health-led, transdisciplinary teams in monthly, one-hour sessions with experts and peer presentations between 2020 and 2023.

Methods

A pre-post mixed-methods design was used. Baseline and endpoint surveys (41/90, 46 %) measured changes in self-reported knowledge and confidence related to 12 strategies for NCCP implementation based on a four-point Likert scale. Comparisons were done using a paired T-test. Seven post-focus group discussions (FGDs) (6/12 countries, 50 %) captured the perceived utility of ECHO for implementing NCCP priorities. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, double-coded, and underwent thematic analysis.

Results

Respondents reported high satisfaction with the curriculum, presentations, and format of the program; however, internet connectivity was a challenge, and duration was identified as an area for improvement. Average self-reported knowledge of and confidence using all 12 strategies increased significantly between pre- and post-surveys (p < 0.0001). Along with expert presentation, the peer-to-peer learning through case-based discussion enhanced their learning experience and ensured that the content was relevant. Some participants recommended incorporating additional one-on-one technical assistance during the program.

Conclusion

Study findings suggest this interactive, bidirectional knowledge exchange approach can be effective for improving knowledge and capacity for non-clinical, system-focused areas such as cancer control planning and policy implementation. Further study is warranted to understand how cancer planners utilize their learnings.
在低收入和中等收入国家实施国家癌症控制计划的回声项目的实施和评价
国际癌症控制伙伴关系(ICCP)回声项目使用一种技术支持的学习模式,就低收入和中等收入国家的国家癌症控制计划(NCCP)实施战略进行知识交流。我们评估了该平台的使用情况,以便在2020年至2023年期间将卫生部领导的跨学科团队聚集在一起,每月与专家进行一小时的会议并进行同行演讲。方法采用前后混合法设计。基线和终点调查(41/ 90,46 %)测量了基于4点李克特量表的12种NCCP实施策略相关的自我报告知识和信心的变化。采用配对t检验进行比较。七次焦点小组讨论(fgd)(6/12个国家,50% %)反映了回声对实施国家重点控制方案优先事项的效用。对fgd进行录音、转录、双重编码,并进行专题分析。调查结果:受访者对课程、演示文稿和课程形式非常满意;然而,互联网连接是一个挑战,持续时间被认为是一个需要改进的领域。使用所有12种策略的平均自我报告知识和信心在调查前后显著增加(p <; 0.0001)。除了专家介绍外,通过基于案例的讨论进行的点对点学习增强了他们的学习经验,并确保了内容的相关性。一些与会者建议在项目期间增加一对一的技术援助。结论研究结果表明,这种互动、双向的知识交流方法可以有效地提高非临床、系统重点领域(如癌症控制规划和政策实施)的知识和能力。进一步的研究是有必要的,以了解癌症计划者如何利用他们的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信