Revealing the impact of albedo on solar panel power generation potential in various installation patterns: Case study of Italy

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Behrouz Pirouz , Seyed Navid Naghib , Karolos J. Kontoleon , Hana Javadi Nejad , Patrizia Piro
{"title":"Revealing the impact of albedo on solar panel power generation potential in various installation patterns: Case study of Italy","authors":"Behrouz Pirouz ,&nbsp;Seyed Navid Naghib ,&nbsp;Karolos J. Kontoleon ,&nbsp;Hana Javadi Nejad ,&nbsp;Patrizia Piro","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of solar panels is expanding, and several kinds of solar panels can be integrated into building shells. Within this context, the current study explores the performance of monofacial and bifacial solar panels on various roof typologies with variable installation patterns and albedos. In this regard, the comparison will aid in comprehending how roof albedo affects yearly energy production, the most suitable way to set up solar panels on the roof, and the distinction between monofacial and bifacial solar panels. The evaluation is specifically based on a set of 160 simulations in North and South Italy. Therefore, in an effort to provide a thorough understanding of their function while taking into account the frequency of shadowing of solar panel surfaces on roof surfaces, other panel surfaces, and radiation reflection from solar panel surfaces to adjacent modules. The findings indicate that the impact of shade frequency appears dominant when solar panels cover more than 40 % of the roof's surface, and there is a noticeable decline in the electricity production of both monofacial and bifacial solar panels. Furthermore, it turns out that the enhanced bifacial output at this rate appears to be triggered by radiation reflection from solar panel surfaces to the rear of other adjacent modules rather than the roof's albedo. In a nutshell, these factors make the current study a valuable addition to the field, particularly with regard to building structures situated in Italy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 473-485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484725003749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of solar panels is expanding, and several kinds of solar panels can be integrated into building shells. Within this context, the current study explores the performance of monofacial and bifacial solar panels on various roof typologies with variable installation patterns and albedos. In this regard, the comparison will aid in comprehending how roof albedo affects yearly energy production, the most suitable way to set up solar panels on the roof, and the distinction between monofacial and bifacial solar panels. The evaluation is specifically based on a set of 160 simulations in North and South Italy. Therefore, in an effort to provide a thorough understanding of their function while taking into account the frequency of shadowing of solar panel surfaces on roof surfaces, other panel surfaces, and radiation reflection from solar panel surfaces to adjacent modules. The findings indicate that the impact of shade frequency appears dominant when solar panels cover more than 40 % of the roof's surface, and there is a noticeable decline in the electricity production of both monofacial and bifacial solar panels. Furthermore, it turns out that the enhanced bifacial output at this rate appears to be triggered by radiation reflection from solar panel surfaces to the rear of other adjacent modules rather than the roof's albedo. In a nutshell, these factors make the current study a valuable addition to the field, particularly with regard to building structures situated in Italy.
揭示反照率对不同安装模式下太阳能电池板发电潜力的影响:以意大利为例
太阳能电池板的应用范围正在扩大,几种太阳能电池板可以集成到建筑外壳中。在此背景下,目前的研究探讨了单面和双面太阳能电池板在不同屋顶类型上的性能,这些屋顶类型具有不同的安装模式和反照率。在这方面,比较将有助于理解屋顶反照率如何影响每年的能源生产,在屋顶上设置太阳能电池板的最合适方式,以及单面和双面太阳能电池板的区别。该评估特别基于在意大利北部和南部进行的160次模拟。因此,为了全面了解它们的功能,同时考虑到太阳能电池板表面在屋顶表面、其他面板表面的阴影频率,以及太阳能电池板表面对相邻模块的辐射反射。研究结果表明,当太阳能电池板覆盖超过40% %的屋顶表面时,遮阳频率的影响占主导地位,并且单面和双面太阳能电池板的发电量都有明显的下降。此外,事实证明,以这种速率增强的双面输出似乎是由太阳能电池板表面对其他相邻模块后部的辐射反射而不是屋顶的反照率触发的。简而言之,这些因素使当前的研究成为该领域的一个有价值的补充,特别是关于位于意大利的建筑结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信