Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements
{"title":"Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements","authors":"Alireza Jafari-Naeimi , Asa Ghorbani , Farzin Aslani , Negin Ashoori","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the associations between both unilateral/bilateral palatal impactions of the maxillary canine and a long list of various dentoalveolar anatomical measurements and parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This case-control study was performed on CBCTs of 3 groups of 23 subjects each (control, unilateral impaction, bilateral impaction, n = 138 hemimaxillae in 69 patients). Examined were the mesiodistal and buccolingual widths of the 1–6 teeth on the right and left sides, all their roots’ lengths, maxillary arch widths on the axial plane at the basal bone and the alveolar bone levels, at the distances 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm from the most anterior point, and maxillary arch circumferences. Moreover, primary canine retention was assessed as well. The groups were compared using chi-square, <em>t</em>-test, ANOVA, and Tukey tests (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant comparisons (<em>P</em> < 0.05) included: At the basal bone level, the arch width of the most anterior section was <em>smaller</em> in the control group compared to the unilateral impaction group only, while interestingly at the alveolar bone level, it was <em>larger</em> in control group compared only to bilateral impaction cases at the most anterior segment. First molar roots were longer in bilateral canine impaction cases compared to control. The buccolingual sizes of premolars/first molar was smaller in control compared to canine impaction. The 5-to-5 arch circumference was smaller in bilateral impaction cases compared the control or unilateral impaction cases (<em>P</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Several dentoalveolar variables were linked to canine impaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 5","pages":"Pages 911-918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825001265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the associations between both unilateral/bilateral palatal impactions of the maxillary canine and a long list of various dentoalveolar anatomical measurements and parameters.
Methods
This case-control study was performed on CBCTs of 3 groups of 23 subjects each (control, unilateral impaction, bilateral impaction, n = 138 hemimaxillae in 69 patients). Examined were the mesiodistal and buccolingual widths of the 1–6 teeth on the right and left sides, all their roots’ lengths, maxillary arch widths on the axial plane at the basal bone and the alveolar bone levels, at the distances 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm from the most anterior point, and maxillary arch circumferences. Moreover, primary canine retention was assessed as well. The groups were compared using chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey tests (α = 0.05).
Results
Significant comparisons (P < 0.05) included: At the basal bone level, the arch width of the most anterior section was smaller in the control group compared to the unilateral impaction group only, while interestingly at the alveolar bone level, it was larger in control group compared only to bilateral impaction cases at the most anterior segment. First molar roots were longer in bilateral canine impaction cases compared to control. The buccolingual sizes of premolars/first molar was smaller in control compared to canine impaction. The 5-to-5 arch circumference was smaller in bilateral impaction cases compared the control or unilateral impaction cases (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Several dentoalveolar variables were linked to canine impaction.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.