The transformation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification Scheme in Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Maria Tysiachniouk , Alexander Vorbrugg
{"title":"The transformation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification Scheme in Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine","authors":"Maria Tysiachniouk ,&nbsp;Alexander Vorbrugg","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the transformation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification scheme in Russia into the complementary Forest Etalon (FE) scheme after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Before the invasion, Russia had the largest FSC-certified forest area worldwide. The FSC gradually withdrew from Russia following the invasion and the sanctions that followed. Yet, forest certification did not disappear with the FSC. The FE, composed largely of former FSC staff and national FSC members, has emerged as the most prominent forest certification organisation in Russia to date (2024). It uses FSC standards for its certificates, and carries on many principles, mechanisms, and resources inherited from the FSC. The article draws on semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and the concept of Governance Generating Networks to analyse the transformation of the FSC into the FE certification scheme and underlying institutional arrangements. It shows how former FSC staff in Russia used the FE to preserve FSC values and standards, and traces how changes in political-economic circumstances since 2022 impacted the agency of and relationship between actors and institutions relevant to the certification network. We argue that this case may be a precursor to future contractions and disruptions in global (forest) governance. Against this background, this analysis contributes to a better understanding of adaptation to fundamental political-economic changes and uncertainty significant beyond the specific case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the transformation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification scheme in Russia into the complementary Forest Etalon (FE) scheme after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Before the invasion, Russia had the largest FSC-certified forest area worldwide. The FSC gradually withdrew from Russia following the invasion and the sanctions that followed. Yet, forest certification did not disappear with the FSC. The FE, composed largely of former FSC staff and national FSC members, has emerged as the most prominent forest certification organisation in Russia to date (2024). It uses FSC standards for its certificates, and carries on many principles, mechanisms, and resources inherited from the FSC. The article draws on semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and the concept of Governance Generating Networks to analyse the transformation of the FSC into the FE certification scheme and underlying institutional arrangements. It shows how former FSC staff in Russia used the FE to preserve FSC values and standards, and traces how changes in political-economic circumstances since 2022 impacted the agency of and relationship between actors and institutions relevant to the certification network. We argue that this case may be a precursor to future contractions and disruptions in global (forest) governance. Against this background, this analysis contributes to a better understanding of adaptation to fundamental political-economic changes and uncertainty significant beyond the specific case.
全面入侵乌克兰后,俄罗斯森林管理委员会(FSC)认证计划的转型
本文研究了俄罗斯2022年入侵乌克兰后,俄罗斯森林管理委员会(FSC)认证计划向补充森林ettalon (FE)计划的转变。在入侵之前,俄罗斯拥有世界上最大的fsc认证森林面积。在入侵和随之而来的制裁之后,FSC逐渐退出了俄罗斯。然而,森林认证并没有随着FSC的出现而消失。FE主要由前FSC工作人员和国家FSC成员组成,已成为迄今为止(2024年)俄罗斯最著名的森林认证组织。它的证书采用FSC标准,并继承了FSC的许多原则、机制和资源。本文利用半结构化访谈、参与者观察和治理生成网络的概念来分析FSC向FE认证计划的转变和潜在的制度安排。它展示了俄罗斯的前FSC工作人员如何利用FE来维护FSC的价值观和标准,并追溯了自2022年以来政治经济环境的变化如何影响与认证网络相关的行动者和机构的代理和关系。我们认为,这种情况可能是未来全球(森林)治理收缩和中断的前兆。在此背景下,这一分析有助于更好地了解如何适应基本的政治经济变化和超出具体情况的重大不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信