Dorothée Arzounian , François Guérit , John M. Deeks , Charlotte Garcia , Evelien de Groote , Manohar Bance , Robert P. Carlyon
{"title":"Measurement of phase-locked neural responses to cochlear-implant stimulation from multiple stages of the auditory system","authors":"Dorothée Arzounian , François Guérit , John M. Deeks , Charlotte Garcia , Evelien de Groote , Manohar Bance , Robert P. Carlyon","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies investigating objective measures of auditory perception when using cochlear implants (CIs) differ in the stimuli used and in the neural response measured. The present study aims to disentangle the effects of response type and of stimulus type on neural response properties. We report three measures corresponding with separate neural latencies, all collected from the same 19 CI recipients and with the same stimulus, consisting of a continuous low-rate electrical pulse train of about 40 pulses per second (pps). These measures comprise the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP), auditory brainstem response (eABR), and auditory steady-state response (eASSR), having putative neural generators in peripheral (auditory nerve), subcortical (brainstem), and thalamo-cortical auditory regions, respectively. When assessing correlations across CI recipients, we found that the growth of eASSR amplitude with stimulus level was correlated with that of eCAP amplitude and predictive of the just-noticeable-to-comfortable electrical dynamic range, as measured through behavioral loudness scaling. Additionally, we compared eASSRs measured with the ∼40-pps stimulus and with a high-rate (500-pps) pulse train modulated in amplitude at rates around 40 Hz, and found that both showed similar recipient-specific effects of stimulation rate on response phase and amplitude. Our results highlight that neural responses to different electrical stimuli and at different central processing stages share common idiosyncratic properties, and support the validity of eASSRs for loudness-growth estimation in CI recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"464 ","pages":"Article 109338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037859552500156X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies investigating objective measures of auditory perception when using cochlear implants (CIs) differ in the stimuli used and in the neural response measured. The present study aims to disentangle the effects of response type and of stimulus type on neural response properties. We report three measures corresponding with separate neural latencies, all collected from the same 19 CI recipients and with the same stimulus, consisting of a continuous low-rate electrical pulse train of about 40 pulses per second (pps). These measures comprise the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP), auditory brainstem response (eABR), and auditory steady-state response (eASSR), having putative neural generators in peripheral (auditory nerve), subcortical (brainstem), and thalamo-cortical auditory regions, respectively. When assessing correlations across CI recipients, we found that the growth of eASSR amplitude with stimulus level was correlated with that of eCAP amplitude and predictive of the just-noticeable-to-comfortable electrical dynamic range, as measured through behavioral loudness scaling. Additionally, we compared eASSRs measured with the ∼40-pps stimulus and with a high-rate (500-pps) pulse train modulated in amplitude at rates around 40 Hz, and found that both showed similar recipient-specific effects of stimulation rate on response phase and amplitude. Our results highlight that neural responses to different electrical stimuli and at different central processing stages share common idiosyncratic properties, and support the validity of eASSRs for loudness-growth estimation in CI recipients.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.