Soil nitrogen availability regulates fungal necromass contribution to soil organic carbon during vegetation restoration

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Tingting Sun , Tian Zhang , Jie Zhou , Zhufeng Wang , Zhigang Huang
{"title":"Soil nitrogen availability regulates fungal necromass contribution to soil organic carbon during vegetation restoration","authors":"Tingting Sun ,&nbsp;Tian Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhufeng Wang ,&nbsp;Zhigang Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial necromass is an important component of soil organic carbon (SOC) and increases with vegetation restoration. Yet, the quantitative evaluation of the drivers of microbial necromass accumulation during restoration on large scales remains unclear. Here, a global meta-analysis of 462 paired peer studies (covering temperate, tropical, and subtropical zones) was firstly conducted to quantitatively evaluate the response of fungal vs. bacterial necromass contributions across restoration strategies. On average, vegetation restoration significantly increased microbial necromass C content by 67 % (95 % CIs: 56 %–79 %), with a greater increase of 115 % (95 % CIs: 97 %–134 %), 75 % (95 % CIs: 63 %–88 %), and 69 % (95 % CIs: 57 %–81 %) in natural restoration, forest soils, and &gt;20 years restoration compared to artificial, grassland, and &lt;20 years restoration, respectively. The constant contributions of microbial necromass to SOC were due to the offset of fungal (10 %) and bacterial necromass (−9 %) contributions to SOC. This observation implies the high consistency of SOC and microbial necromass, as well as the importance of fungal-dominated community in SOC sequestration. The restoration effects on microbial necromass and C sequestration were dominantly explained by soil C/N (nitrogen) as soil C/N &gt; 15 enhanced microbial biomass (MB) conversion to necromass (ΔMNC/MB = 1.21), driving SOC sequestration. This indicates that vegetation restoration might be an efficient approach for microbial-derived C accumulation in N-limited soils (soil C/N &gt; 15), such as ecologically vulnerable regions. Overall, this study indicates that long-term natural forest restoration is recommended for microbial necromass accumulation, and highlights the importance of soil N availability in improving soil microbial-derived C sequestration in response to global land use changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 106279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325004172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial necromass is an important component of soil organic carbon (SOC) and increases with vegetation restoration. Yet, the quantitative evaluation of the drivers of microbial necromass accumulation during restoration on large scales remains unclear. Here, a global meta-analysis of 462 paired peer studies (covering temperate, tropical, and subtropical zones) was firstly conducted to quantitatively evaluate the response of fungal vs. bacterial necromass contributions across restoration strategies. On average, vegetation restoration significantly increased microbial necromass C content by 67 % (95 % CIs: 56 %–79 %), with a greater increase of 115 % (95 % CIs: 97 %–134 %), 75 % (95 % CIs: 63 %–88 %), and 69 % (95 % CIs: 57 %–81 %) in natural restoration, forest soils, and >20 years restoration compared to artificial, grassland, and <20 years restoration, respectively. The constant contributions of microbial necromass to SOC were due to the offset of fungal (10 %) and bacterial necromass (−9 %) contributions to SOC. This observation implies the high consistency of SOC and microbial necromass, as well as the importance of fungal-dominated community in SOC sequestration. The restoration effects on microbial necromass and C sequestration were dominantly explained by soil C/N (nitrogen) as soil C/N > 15 enhanced microbial biomass (MB) conversion to necromass (ΔMNC/MB = 1.21), driving SOC sequestration. This indicates that vegetation restoration might be an efficient approach for microbial-derived C accumulation in N-limited soils (soil C/N > 15), such as ecologically vulnerable regions. Overall, this study indicates that long-term natural forest restoration is recommended for microbial necromass accumulation, and highlights the importance of soil N availability in improving soil microbial-derived C sequestration in response to global land use changes.
植被恢复过程中,土壤氮素有效性调节真菌坏死团对土壤有机碳的贡献
微生物坏死块是土壤有机碳(SOC)的重要组成部分,随着植被恢复而增加。然而,大规模恢复过程中微生物坏死团积累的驱动因素的定量评估仍不清楚。本文首先对462项配对同行研究(涵盖温带、热带和亚热带地区)进行了全球荟萃分析,定量评估了真菌和细菌坏死块在恢复策略中的作用。平均而言,植被恢复显著增加微生物死亡点C含量67% (95% ci: 56% ~ 79%),其中自然恢复、森林土壤和20年恢复的微生物死亡点C含量分别比人工恢复、草地和20年恢复的微生物死亡点C含量增加115% (95% ci: 97% ~ 134%)、75% (95% ci: 63% ~ 88%)和69% (95% ci: 57% ~ 81%)。微生物坏死团块对有机碳的持续贡献是由于真菌(10%)和细菌坏死团块(- 9%)对有机碳贡献的抵消。这表明土壤有机碳和微生物坏死团的高度一致性,以及真菌主导的群落在有机碳固存中的重要性。土壤C/N(氮)主要解释了土壤C/N >对微生物坏死和碳固存的恢复作用;15 .促进微生物生物量(MB)向坏死物质的转化(ΔMNC/MB = 1.21),促进有机碳的固存。这表明植被恢复可能是氮素限制土壤(土壤C/N >;15),如生态脆弱地区。总体而言,本研究表明,长期的天然林恢复有利于微生物坏死团的积累,并强调了土壤氮有效性在改善全球土地利用变化下土壤微生物源碳固存中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信