A detailed profiling study from the national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry: rationale and design

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tanya Badal , Calum Nicholson , Julian Ayer , Michael Cheung , Leeanne Grigg , David S. Celermajer , Geoff Strange
{"title":"A detailed profiling study from the national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry: rationale and design","authors":"Tanya Badal ,&nbsp;Calum Nicholson ,&nbsp;Julian Ayer ,&nbsp;Michael Cheung ,&nbsp;Leeanne Grigg ,&nbsp;David S. Celermajer ,&nbsp;Geoff Strange","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous research has outlined significant gaps in the care of children and adults with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD). The Australian Study of the Burden and Outcomes of CHD will assess medical, psychological, social and economic issues affecting CHD patients and carers and provide a detailed account of CHD patients’ healthcare utilisation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A random sample of patients aged ≥5 years, equally split between genders, CHD complexity (mild, moderate, severe) and rural and remote locations (20–25%) was extracted from the National Australian CHD Registry (n = 68,214) from four large participating CHD centres (2 adult and 2 child). Patients and their carers were invited to participate in an in-person study visit for physical assessment and for a series of surveys questioning physical and mental health, neurodevelopment, and quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 6,726 contacted patients, 1,911 (28%) consented, with 99.5% of surveys completed online. 1,658 consented participants completed at least one study activity (87% response rate). Proxies/carers completed surveys for 11% of participants (primarily those under age 8 or with intellectual disability). All study activities were completed by 750 respondents (45%). Respondents were older (median age 24 [IQR 12–41 years] vs 18 [IQR 11–35 years], p = 0.005) and had a higher proportion of severe CHD (28%) compared to non-respondents (23%). No significant differences in disease complexity were observed between respondents and non-respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This multi-site study of over 1600 CHD patients aims to offer the first comprehensive profiling of the burdens and outcomes faced by Australia's growing CHD population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73429,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852500031X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous research has outlined significant gaps in the care of children and adults with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD). The Australian Study of the Burden and Outcomes of CHD will assess medical, psychological, social and economic issues affecting CHD patients and carers and provide a detailed account of CHD patients’ healthcare utilisation.

Methods

A random sample of patients aged ≥5 years, equally split between genders, CHD complexity (mild, moderate, severe) and rural and remote locations (20–25%) was extracted from the National Australian CHD Registry (n = 68,214) from four large participating CHD centres (2 adult and 2 child). Patients and their carers were invited to participate in an in-person study visit for physical assessment and for a series of surveys questioning physical and mental health, neurodevelopment, and quality of life.

Results

Of 6,726 contacted patients, 1,911 (28%) consented, with 99.5% of surveys completed online. 1,658 consented participants completed at least one study activity (87% response rate). Proxies/carers completed surveys for 11% of participants (primarily those under age 8 or with intellectual disability). All study activities were completed by 750 respondents (45%). Respondents were older (median age 24 [IQR 12–41 years] vs 18 [IQR 11–35 years], p = 0.005) and had a higher proportion of severe CHD (28%) compared to non-respondents (23%). No significant differences in disease complexity were observed between respondents and non-respondents.

Conclusion

This multi-site study of over 1600 CHD patients aims to offer the first comprehensive profiling of the burdens and outcomes faced by Australia's growing CHD population.
来自澳大利亚国家先天性心脏病登记处的详细分析研究:基本原理和设计
背景先前的研究概述了先天性心脏病(CHD)儿童和成人护理方面的重大差距。澳大利亚冠心病负担和结果研究将评估影响冠心病患者和护理人员的医疗、心理、社会和经济问题,并提供冠心病患者医疗保健利用的详细说明。方法随机抽取年龄≥5岁、性别、冠心病复杂程度(轻度、中度、重度)、农村和偏远地区(20-25%)的患者样本,这些患者来自澳大利亚国家冠心病登记处(n = 68214) 4个大型参与冠心病中心(2个成人和2个儿童)。患者和他们的护理人员被邀请参加一次面对面的研究访问,以进行身体评估,并进行一系列关于身心健康、神经发育和生活质量的调查。结果在6726名接触的患者中,1911名(28%)同意,其中99.5%的调查是在线完成的。1,658名同意的参与者完成了至少一项研究活动(87%的响应率)。代理/护理人员为11%的参与者(主要是8岁以下或有智力残疾的参与者)完成了调查。所有研究活动由750名受访者(45%)完成。受访者年龄较大(中位年龄24岁[IQR 12-41岁]对18岁[IQR 11-35岁],p = 0.005),严重冠心病的比例(28%)高于非受访者(23%)。调查对象和非调查对象在疾病复杂性方面没有显著差异。这项涉及1600多名冠心病患者的多中心研究旨在首次全面分析澳大利亚不断增长的冠心病患者所面临的负担和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信