The future of endodontic diagnosis

Marie Mora DDS, MS , Juan Pacheco-Yanes DDS, MS, PhD , Asgeir Sigurdsson DDS, MS
{"title":"The future of endodontic diagnosis","authors":"Marie Mora DDS, MS ,&nbsp;Juan Pacheco-Yanes DDS, MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Asgeir Sigurdsson DDS, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jfscie.2025.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Innovative methods for pulpal diagnosis are becoming increasingly important in endodontics, as traditional diagnostic techniques often lack the precision and reliability needed for confident decision making. Molecular diagnostic approaches, like biomarker analysis and advanced sampling methods, represent a step forward in clinical practice. This narrative review aims to identify key biomarkers associated with pulpal inflammation, compare published cutoff points for these biomarkers, and briefly review molecular methods and sampling techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Search Strategy</h3><div>This study is a narrative review of literature identified by a web-based search on PubMed. Original scientific articles, such as clinical studies, reviews, and case reports, were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Several biomarkers have been associated with pulp inflammation and have been reported as statistically significant, including interleukin 1, 6, and 8; tumor necrosis factor-α; vascular endothelial growth factor; fibrocyte growth factor acidic; and matrix metalloproteinases 8 and 9. Although some cutoff points for these biomarkers have been identified, further research is necessary to refine their clinical applicability. Various sample collection methods, such as gingival crevicular fluid, dentinal fluid, pulpal tissue, and pulpal blood, have been used. Among the analytical techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Luminex protein assays have proven to be the most accurate, sensitive, and specific for evaluating pulpal inflammation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73530,"journal":{"name":"JADA foundational science","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADA foundational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X25000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Innovative methods for pulpal diagnosis are becoming increasingly important in endodontics, as traditional diagnostic techniques often lack the precision and reliability needed for confident decision making. Molecular diagnostic approaches, like biomarker analysis and advanced sampling methods, represent a step forward in clinical practice. This narrative review aims to identify key biomarkers associated with pulpal inflammation, compare published cutoff points for these biomarkers, and briefly review molecular methods and sampling techniques.

Search Strategy

This study is a narrative review of literature identified by a web-based search on PubMed. Original scientific articles, such as clinical studies, reviews, and case reports, were included.

Results

Several biomarkers have been associated with pulp inflammation and have been reported as statistically significant, including interleukin 1, 6, and 8; tumor necrosis factor-α; vascular endothelial growth factor; fibrocyte growth factor acidic; and matrix metalloproteinases 8 and 9. Although some cutoff points for these biomarkers have been identified, further research is necessary to refine their clinical applicability. Various sample collection methods, such as gingival crevicular fluid, dentinal fluid, pulpal tissue, and pulpal blood, have been used. Among the analytical techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Luminex protein assays have proven to be the most accurate, sensitive, and specific for evaluating pulpal inflammation.

Abstract Image

牙髓诊断的未来
在牙髓学中,由于传统的牙髓诊断技术往往缺乏准确性和可靠性,因此创新的牙髓诊断方法变得越来越重要。分子诊断方法,如生物标志物分析和先进的采样方法,代表了临床实践的一个进步。本文旨在确定与牙髓炎相关的关键生物标志物,比较已发表的这些生物标志物的截止点,并简要回顾分子方法和采样技术。搜索策略本研究是对PubMed上基于网络的搜索确定的文献的叙述性综述。原始的科学文章,如临床研究、评论和病例报告,被纳入。结果一些生物标志物与牙髓炎症相关,并已报道具有统计学意义,包括白细胞介素1、6和8;肿瘤坏死因子-α;血管内皮生长因子;纤维细胞生长因子酸性;基质金属蛋白酶8号和9号。虽然已经确定了这些生物标志物的一些截止点,但需要进一步的研究来完善其临床适用性。不同的样本收集方法,如龈沟液、牙本质液、牙髓组织和牙髓血,已被使用。在分析技术中,酶联免疫吸附法和Luminex蛋白法被证明是评估牙髓炎症最准确、敏感和特异性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JADA foundational science
JADA foundational science Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信