Empty pledges and powerless conventions: How transition climate risks are disrupting financial markets?

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Hany Fahmy
{"title":"Empty pledges and powerless conventions: How transition climate risks are disrupting financial markets?","authors":"Hany Fahmy","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose mention volume index (MVI) as a novel alternative measure of attention to Google's search volume index (SVI). We construct several physical and transition climate risk indexes as shocks to corresponding climate MVIs that we construct by employing textual analysis on climate change narratives on social media between July 2010 and 2022. Using predictive regressions and several test assets, we investigate the response of asset prices to our climate risk indexes at the market level and the asset level. The predictions of our physical climate risk indexes support three stylized findings in the climate finance literature: (i) the carbon premium hypothesis, (ii) the rise in investors' awareness after the Paris Agreement, and (iii) the prediction that green firms outperform brown firms when concerns about weather risk increase unexpectedly. The predictions of our transition climate risk indexes provide new evidence documenting noise trading behavior in the form of return reversal an excess volatility in aggregate market level indexes following unexpected increases in attention to climate pledges and conventions. Moreover, at the asset-level, a rise in attention to climate pledges today is associated with an initial increase (decrease) in the returns of green (brown) firms on the second day. These responses are reversed on the fourth day. Peak and sentiment analyses of climate mentions around these events show that the return reversal is due to the backtracking and the lack of credibility of these promises. Finally, we find that the ineffectiveness of the U.S. carbon policy triggers flight to safety to the bond mutual fund market and disrupts the performance of green (but not brown) firms' stock prices. Unexpected increases in concerns about carbon policy risk on social media today is associated with an initial increase in green returns on the third day that is almost entirely reversed on the fourth day.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 104384"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925004715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose mention volume index (MVI) as a novel alternative measure of attention to Google's search volume index (SVI). We construct several physical and transition climate risk indexes as shocks to corresponding climate MVIs that we construct by employing textual analysis on climate change narratives on social media between July 2010 and 2022. Using predictive regressions and several test assets, we investigate the response of asset prices to our climate risk indexes at the market level and the asset level. The predictions of our physical climate risk indexes support three stylized findings in the climate finance literature: (i) the carbon premium hypothesis, (ii) the rise in investors' awareness after the Paris Agreement, and (iii) the prediction that green firms outperform brown firms when concerns about weather risk increase unexpectedly. The predictions of our transition climate risk indexes provide new evidence documenting noise trading behavior in the form of return reversal an excess volatility in aggregate market level indexes following unexpected increases in attention to climate pledges and conventions. Moreover, at the asset-level, a rise in attention to climate pledges today is associated with an initial increase (decrease) in the returns of green (brown) firms on the second day. These responses are reversed on the fourth day. Peak and sentiment analyses of climate mentions around these events show that the return reversal is due to the backtracking and the lack of credibility of these promises. Finally, we find that the ineffectiveness of the U.S. carbon policy triggers flight to safety to the bond mutual fund market and disrupts the performance of green (but not brown) firms' stock prices. Unexpected increases in concerns about carbon policy risk on social media today is associated with an initial increase in green returns on the third day that is almost entirely reversed on the fourth day.
空洞的承诺和无力的公约:气候转型风险如何扰乱金融市场?
我们提出了提及量指数(MVI)作为b谷歌的搜索量指数(SVI)的一种新的替代度量。通过对2010年7月至2022年社交媒体上的气候变化叙事进行文本分析,我们构建了几个物理和转型气候风险指数,作为对相应气候风险指数的冲击。利用预测回归和几种测试资产,我们在市场水平和资产水平上研究了资产价格对气候风险指数的响应。我们的物理气候风险指数预测支持气候金融文献中的三个风式化发现:(i)碳溢价假设,(ii)《巴黎协定》后投资者意识的提高,以及(iii)当对天气风险的担忧意外增加时,绿色公司表现优于棕色公司的预测。我们的过渡气候风险指数的预测提供了新的证据,证明了在对气候承诺和公约的关注意外增加后,总市场水平指数的回报逆转和过度波动形式的噪音交易行为。此外,在资产层面,今天对气候承诺关注的增加与绿色(棕色)公司第二天收益的初始增加(减少)有关。这些反应在第四天被逆转。围绕这些事件的气候提及的峰值和情绪分析表明,回报逆转是由于回溯和缺乏这些承诺的可信度。最后,我们发现美国碳政策的无效引发了债券共同基金市场的避险行为,并扰乱了绿色(而不是棕色)公司的股价表现。今天,社交媒体上对碳政策风险的担忧意外增加,与绿色回报在第三天开始增加、在第四天几乎完全逆转有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信