Raising the Alarm

Ghazaleh Goldar MD , Aaron A. Sifuentes MD , Kaushik Gokul BS , Usamah M. ElBakkush MD , Mohammed Mhanna MD , Peter Farjo MD , Paari Dominic MBBS
{"title":"Raising the Alarm","authors":"Ghazaleh Goldar MD ,&nbsp;Aaron A. Sifuentes MD ,&nbsp;Kaushik Gokul BS ,&nbsp;Usamah M. ElBakkush MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mhanna MD ,&nbsp;Peter Farjo MD ,&nbsp;Paari Dominic MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac abnormalities are often the first or only sign of sarcoidosis. Current guidelines recommend evaluating for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) in patients below 60 years with unexplained complete heart block (CHB).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of the study was to assess the proportion of patients with unexplained CHB who receive guideline-recommended testing for CS and to compare subsequent diagnosis rates with expected prevalence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data, identifying patients aged 18 to 60 years with unexplained CHB requiring device placement over the past 5 years. We assessed the use of cardiac diagnostic tests—cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, chest computed tomography, and myocardial biopsy—and tracked CS diagnoses over 5 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1,279 patients meeting criteria across 55 health care organizations, 75% were treated at academic centers. The mean age was 48 ± 11 years; 53% were male, and 73% were White. Over a median follow-up of 724 days (Q1-Q3: 0-1,117), advanced cardiac testing was performed in 256 patients (20.0%; 95% CI: 17.8%-22.2%). Specific test utilization included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 131 patients (10.2%; 95% CI: 8.6%-11.9%), chest computed tomography in 141 (11.0%; 95% CI: 9.3%-12.7%), cardiac positron emission tomography in ≤10 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%), and myocardial biopsy in ≤10 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%). Fewer than 10 patients (&lt;1%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%) were diagnosed with CS, far below the expected prevalence of 19% to 34%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite guideline recommendations, diagnostic testing for CS in younger patients with unexplained CHB remains low. This gap likely contributes to significant underdiagnosis and highlights the need for improved adherence to evaluation protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 7","pages":"Article 101890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac abnormalities are often the first or only sign of sarcoidosis. Current guidelines recommend evaluating for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) in patients below 60 years with unexplained complete heart block (CHB).

Objectives

The aim of the study was to assess the proportion of patients with unexplained CHB who receive guideline-recommended testing for CS and to compare subsequent diagnosis rates with expected prevalence.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data, identifying patients aged 18 to 60 years with unexplained CHB requiring device placement over the past 5 years. We assessed the use of cardiac diagnostic tests—cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, chest computed tomography, and myocardial biopsy—and tracked CS diagnoses over 5 years.

Results

Among 1,279 patients meeting criteria across 55 health care organizations, 75% were treated at academic centers. The mean age was 48 ± 11 years; 53% were male, and 73% were White. Over a median follow-up of 724 days (Q1-Q3: 0-1,117), advanced cardiac testing was performed in 256 patients (20.0%; 95% CI: 17.8%-22.2%). Specific test utilization included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 131 patients (10.2%; 95% CI: 8.6%-11.9%), chest computed tomography in 141 (11.0%; 95% CI: 9.3%-12.7%), cardiac positron emission tomography in ≤10 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%), and myocardial biopsy in ≤10 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%). Fewer than 10 patients (<1%; 95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%) were diagnosed with CS, far below the expected prevalence of 19% to 34%.

Conclusions

Despite guideline recommendations, diagnostic testing for CS in younger patients with unexplained CHB remains low. This gap likely contributes to significant underdiagnosis and highlights the need for improved adherence to evaluation protocols.
敲响警钟
背景:心脏异常通常是结节病的第一个或唯一征象。目前的指南建议在60岁以下伴有不明原因完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)的患者中评估心脏结节病(CS)。目的本研究的目的是评估接受指南推荐的CS检测的不明原因慢性乙型肝炎患者的比例,并比较随后的诊断率和预期患病率。方法:我们使用TriNetX数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究,确定了过去5年内年龄在18至60岁的不明原因CHB患者,这些患者需要放置器械。我们评估了心脏诊断测试(心脏磁共振成像、正电子发射断层扫描、胸部计算机断层扫描和心肌活检)的使用情况,并追踪了5年以上的CS诊断。结果在55个医疗机构的1279名符合标准的患者中,75%在学术中心接受治疗。平均年龄48±11岁;53%为男性,73%为白人。在中位随访724天(Q1-Q3: 0- 1117)中,256例患者(20.0%;95% ci: 17.8%-22.2%)。特殊检测包括131例心脏磁共振成像患者(10.2%;95% CI: 8.6%-11.9%),胸部计算机断层扫描141例(11.0%;95% CI: 9.3%-12.7%),心脏正电子发射断层扫描≤10例(0.7%;95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%),心肌活检≤10例(0.7%;95% ci: 0.3%-1.3%)。少于10例(<1%;95% CI: 0.3%-1.3%)被诊断为CS,远低于预期的19% - 34%的患病率。结论:尽管指南推荐,但不明原因慢性乙型肝炎的年轻患者CS诊断检测仍然很低。这一差距可能导致严重的诊断不足,并强调需要改进对评估方案的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信