Component-based approach of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ibrahim Ezuddin M. Almaski , Yazan Jumah Alalwani , Reem Salem Alshammari , Rayyan Mohammed A. Alassiri , Salman Ahmed S. Jathmi , Aishah Mohammed Alhadi , Amal Saleh Alzahrani , Mohammed Abdulwahed Alzahrani , Ahmed Y. Azzam , Tareq A. Maani
{"title":"Component-based approach of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ibrahim Ezuddin M. Almaski ,&nbsp;Yazan Jumah Alalwani ,&nbsp;Reem Salem Alshammari ,&nbsp;Rayyan Mohammed A. Alassiri ,&nbsp;Salman Ahmed S. Jathmi ,&nbsp;Aishah Mohammed Alhadi ,&nbsp;Amal Saleh Alzahrani ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdulwahed Alzahrani ,&nbsp;Ahmed Y. Azzam ,&nbsp;Tareq A. Maani","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2025.100376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based care improvement processes designed to minimize and reduce the negative physiological consequences of surgery. While previous studies have investigated ERAS in bariatric surgery, none have evaluated which specific components contribute most significantly to improved outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with total of 740 patients comparing ERAS protocols to standard care in bariatric surgery were included. We conducted component-specific meta-regression analysis of 14 individual ERAS elements, dose-response analysis across three implementation levels (low: ≤4 components, medium: 5–8 components, high: ≥9 components), and component clustering to identify synergistic combinations. Meta-regression was used to determine the relative impact of individual components on recovery and safety outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six RCTs including a total of 740 patients were included. Patients randomized to ERAS protocols have experienced significant reductions in nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.19–0.95, P-value = 0.040), intraoperative time (MD: 5.40, 95 % CI: 3.05–7.77, P-value&lt;0.001), time to mobilization (MD: 3.78, 95 % CI: 5.46 to −2.10, P-value&lt;0.001), intensive care unit length of stay (MD: 0.70, 95 % CI: 0.13–1.27, P-value = 0.020), total hospital stay (MD: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.69 to −0.16, P-value = 0.002), and functional hospital stay (MD: 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.98 to −0.22, P-value = 0.002). Component-based analysis demonstrated that early mobilization, anti-emetic protocols, optimized anesthesia, and multimodal analgesia contributed most significantly to improved outcomes. We observed a clear dose-response relationship, with greater benefits in studies implementing more ERAS components.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ERAS protocols significantly improve recovery metrics following bariatric surgery, with certain components demonstrating greater impact than others. Early mobilization and anti-emetic protocols appear particularly beneficial, while the “Complete Recovery Bundle” demonstrates synergistic effects. We recommend a tiered implementation approach, prioritizing high-impact components, especially in resource-limited settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936825000325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based care improvement processes designed to minimize and reduce the negative physiological consequences of surgery. While previous studies have investigated ERAS in bariatric surgery, none have evaluated which specific components contribute most significantly to improved outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with total of 740 patients comparing ERAS protocols to standard care in bariatric surgery were included. We conducted component-specific meta-regression analysis of 14 individual ERAS elements, dose-response analysis across three implementation levels (low: ≤4 components, medium: 5–8 components, high: ≥9 components), and component clustering to identify synergistic combinations. Meta-regression was used to determine the relative impact of individual components on recovery and safety outcomes.

Results

Six RCTs including a total of 740 patients were included. Patients randomized to ERAS protocols have experienced significant reductions in nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.19–0.95, P-value = 0.040), intraoperative time (MD: 5.40, 95 % CI: 3.05–7.77, P-value<0.001), time to mobilization (MD: 3.78, 95 % CI: 5.46 to −2.10, P-value<0.001), intensive care unit length of stay (MD: 0.70, 95 % CI: 0.13–1.27, P-value = 0.020), total hospital stay (MD: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.69 to −0.16, P-value = 0.002), and functional hospital stay (MD: 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.98 to −0.22, P-value = 0.002). Component-based analysis demonstrated that early mobilization, anti-emetic protocols, optimized anesthesia, and multimodal analgesia contributed most significantly to improved outcomes. We observed a clear dose-response relationship, with greater benefits in studies implementing more ERAS components.

Conclusion

ERAS protocols significantly improve recovery metrics following bariatric surgery, with certain components demonstrating greater impact than others. Early mobilization and anti-emetic protocols appear particularly beneficial, while the “Complete Recovery Bundle” demonstrates synergistic effects. We recommend a tiered implementation approach, prioritizing high-impact components, especially in resource-limited settings.
在减肥手术中增强术后恢复的基于组件的方法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案是基于证据的护理改进过程,旨在最大限度地减少手术的负面生理后果。虽然以前的研究调查了ERAS在减肥手术中的应用,但没有研究评估哪些特定成分对改善结果的贡献最大。方法:我们按照PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。包括6项随机对照试验(rct),共740例患者,比较ERAS方案与减肥手术的标准治疗。我们对14个单独的ERAS元素进行了特定成分的meta回归分析,对三个实施水平(低:≤4个成分,中:5-8个成分,高:≥9个成分)进行了剂量-反应分析,并对成分进行聚类以确定协同组合。meta回归用于确定各个成分对恢复和安全结果的相对影响。结果纳入6项随机对照试验,共740例患者。患者随机分配到时代协议经历显著减少恶心、呕吐(OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19—-0.95,p = 0.040),术中时间(MD: 5.40, 95%置信区间CI: 3.05 - -7.77, P-value< 0.001),时间动员(MD: 3.78, 95% CI: 5.46−2.10,P-value< 0.001),重症监护室住院时间(MD: 0.70, 95%置信区间CI: 0.13 - -1.27, p = 0.020),总住院(MD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.69−0.16,p = 0.002),住院和功能(MD:0.60, 95% CI: 0.98 ~ - 0.22, p值= 0.002)。基于成分的分析表明,早期动员、止吐方案、优化麻醉和多模式镇痛对改善结果贡献最大。我们观察到明显的剂量-反应关系,在使用更多ERAS成分的研究中获益更大。结论eras方案显著提高了减肥手术后的恢复指标,其中某些部分的影响比其他部分更大。早期动员和止吐方案似乎特别有益,而“完全恢复包”显示协同效应。我们建议采用分层实施方法,优先考虑影响较大的组成部分,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信