History calling: Strengthening evidence-based politics and policymaking in the European Parliament

Wolfram Kaiser
{"title":"History calling: Strengthening evidence-based politics and policymaking in the European Parliament","authors":"Wolfram Kaiser","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Democratic parliaments require institutional memory and a sense of purpose in part derived from it. Research on the history of the European Parliament of the European Union has created three major impacts: first, to strengthen the recognition among the administrative and political leadership of the importance of understanding the institution’s history in the broader context of post-war European integration, resulting in the institutionalisation of the European Parliament History Service; second, the wide-spread understanding that research on the history of the European Parliament is relevant to its own collective identity, facilitating cooperation among its political groups and members across cultural and ideological barriers; and third, strengthening evidence-based politics and policymaking about current and future issues through the applied academic analysis of historical dynamics of previous initiatives, changing contexts, and historical trajectories, and feeding the findings to the political groups and members through a variety of events and outputs. Generating political, societal, and cultural impacts in a democratic parliament in this way crucially requires the willingness and ability of both researchers and administrative managers to understand the logics of different fields and to cross them to maximize the benefits for the institution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697725000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Democratic parliaments require institutional memory and a sense of purpose in part derived from it. Research on the history of the European Parliament of the European Union has created three major impacts: first, to strengthen the recognition among the administrative and political leadership of the importance of understanding the institution’s history in the broader context of post-war European integration, resulting in the institutionalisation of the European Parliament History Service; second, the wide-spread understanding that research on the history of the European Parliament is relevant to its own collective identity, facilitating cooperation among its political groups and members across cultural and ideological barriers; and third, strengthening evidence-based politics and policymaking about current and future issues through the applied academic analysis of historical dynamics of previous initiatives, changing contexts, and historical trajectories, and feeding the findings to the political groups and members through a variety of events and outputs. Generating political, societal, and cultural impacts in a democratic parliament in this way crucially requires the willingness and ability of both researchers and administrative managers to understand the logics of different fields and to cross them to maximize the benefits for the institution.
历史召唤:加强欧洲议会的循证政治和决策
民主议会需要制度记忆,以及某种程度上源于此的使命感。对欧盟欧洲议会历史的研究产生了三个主要影响:首先,加强了行政和政治领导层对在战后欧洲一体化的更广泛背景下理解该机构历史的重要性的认识,导致了欧洲议会历史服务的制度化;第二,人们普遍认识到,对欧洲议会历史的研究与欧洲议会自身的集体认同有关,促进了其政治团体和成员之间跨越文化和意识形态障碍的合作;第三,通过对以往倡议的历史动态、不断变化的背景和历史轨迹的应用学术分析,加强基于证据的政治和关于当前和未来问题的政策制定,并通过各种活动和产出将研究结果提供给政治团体和成员。以这种方式在民主议会中产生政治、社会和文化影响至关重要,这需要研究人员和行政管理人员都愿意和有能力理解不同领域的逻辑,并将它们交叉起来,以使机构的利益最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信