The clinical inadequacy of the concept of treatment-resistant depression: Innovative strategies in assessment and psychotherapeutic management

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jenny Guidi , Giovanni A. Fava
{"title":"The clinical inadequacy of the concept of treatment-resistant depression: Innovative strategies in assessment and psychotherapeutic management","authors":"Jenny Guidi ,&nbsp;Giovanni A. Fava","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmacological strategies have been developed for patients with major depressive disorder who fail to respond to standard drug treatment. The current clinical approach primarily relies on counting episodes that fulfill specific criteria and regards non-pharmacological strategies as of marginal value, despite their recognized importance in treating depression. Most attention is devoted to treatment-resistant patients' characteristics rather than to the process related to therapeutic management. However, how the patient experiences the treatment process, his/her interaction with the physician/therapist and significant others, and the patient's role in treatment plan (self-management) are all essential therapeutic components. A broader evaluation of factors related to the patient (e.g., illness denial, psychological reactance, demoralization), the therapy (e.g., clinician's attitude, behavioral toxicity of antidepressants), the environment (e.g., allostatic load/overload and health-damaging behaviors), and morbidity (e.g., medical and psychiatric comorbidity) is warranted. Assessment based on clinimetric methods (i.e., staging, macro-analysis) and clinical judgment allow a differential diagnosis of phenomena such as non-response, pseudo-resistance, treatment resistance, loss of clinical effect during maintenance antidepressant treatment, failure to achieve remission after a psychotherapy trial, partially remitted depression (i.e., presence of residual symptoms). Choice of the psychotherapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy, should follow the indications derived from clinical assessment. Treatment of TRD can thus be conceptualized as an integrated therapeutic approach to different components encompassing symptoms, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and psychological well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102616"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000832","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacological strategies have been developed for patients with major depressive disorder who fail to respond to standard drug treatment. The current clinical approach primarily relies on counting episodes that fulfill specific criteria and regards non-pharmacological strategies as of marginal value, despite their recognized importance in treating depression. Most attention is devoted to treatment-resistant patients' characteristics rather than to the process related to therapeutic management. However, how the patient experiences the treatment process, his/her interaction with the physician/therapist and significant others, and the patient's role in treatment plan (self-management) are all essential therapeutic components. A broader evaluation of factors related to the patient (e.g., illness denial, psychological reactance, demoralization), the therapy (e.g., clinician's attitude, behavioral toxicity of antidepressants), the environment (e.g., allostatic load/overload and health-damaging behaviors), and morbidity (e.g., medical and psychiatric comorbidity) is warranted. Assessment based on clinimetric methods (i.e., staging, macro-analysis) and clinical judgment allow a differential diagnosis of phenomena such as non-response, pseudo-resistance, treatment resistance, loss of clinical effect during maintenance antidepressant treatment, failure to achieve remission after a psychotherapy trial, partially remitted depression (i.e., presence of residual symptoms). Choice of the psychotherapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy, should follow the indications derived from clinical assessment. Treatment of TRD can thus be conceptualized as an integrated therapeutic approach to different components encompassing symptoms, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and psychological well-being.

Abstract Image

难治性抑郁症概念的临床不足:评估和心理治疗管理的创新策略
对于标准药物治疗无效的重性抑郁症患者,已经开发了药理学策略。目前的临床方法主要依赖于满足特定标准的发作次数,并将非药物策略视为边缘价值,尽管它们在治疗抑郁症方面具有公认的重要性。大多数注意力都集中在治疗抵抗患者的特征上,而不是与治疗管理相关的过程。然而,患者如何体验治疗过程,他/她与医生/治疗师和重要他人的互动,以及患者在治疗计划中的角色(自我管理)都是必不可少的治疗组成部分。有必要对与患者相关的因素进行更广泛的评估(例如,疾病否认、心理抗拒、士气低落)、治疗(例如,临床医生的态度、抗抑郁药的行为毒性)、环境(例如,适应负荷/过载和损害健康的行为)和发病率(例如,医疗和精神合并症)。基于临床计量方法(即分期、宏观分析)和临床判断的评估可以对诸如无反应、伪耐药、治疗耐药、维持抗抑郁药物治疗期间临床效果丧失、心理治疗试验后未能达到缓解、部分缓解的抑郁症(即存在残留症状)等现象进行鉴别诊断。难治性抑郁症(TRD)的心理治疗方法的选择,特别是认知行为治疗、正念认知治疗和人际心理治疗,应遵循临床评估得出的适应症。因此,对TRD的治疗可以概念化为对包括症状、社会心理因素、生活方式和心理健康在内的不同组成部分采取综合治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信