A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Referrals Within Healthcare Settings

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sarah J. Greenman, Audrianna Wylie, Brandon Taylor, Valerie Chepp
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Referrals Within Healthcare Settings","authors":"Sarah J. Greenman, Audrianna Wylie, Brandon Taylor, Valerie Chepp","doi":"10.1177/15248380251343183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem that medical providers can help address by identifying affected patients and providing appropriate referrals. This scoping review examines IPV referrals in healthcare settings—the step that occurs after IPV victimization is identified by a medical provider through a screening tool. Three research databases—Criminal Justice Abstracts, PubMed, and PsycINFO—were searched for literature published between 2012 and 2022, using the key terms “intimate partner violence,” “screen*,” and “refer*.” Sources ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 265) were screened using three primary eligibility requirements: (a) an adult was the primary victim of IPV, (b) a screening and referral process occurred in a healthcare setting by a healthcare professional who routinely conducted screenings, and (c) a referral process, the period after IPV was positively identified through the use of a screener, was explored. After removing 172 articles during initial abstract screening and another 10 articles after full text review, 36 studies compromised the final dataset. Findings show inconsistencies and gaps in the referral process within healthcare settings. While numerous medical bodies recommend IPV screening, our review reveals a lack of consistency in what follows a positive IPV screening, particularly with regard to referral type and frequency. Referral effectiveness was measured in multiple ways across studies, and several barriers to referrals were identified. The findings from this scoping review suggest that future research should untether empirical investigations of the referral process from screening, and researchers should work with practitioners to explore the effect of consistent referrals with patient follow-ups.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251343183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem that medical providers can help address by identifying affected patients and providing appropriate referrals. This scoping review examines IPV referrals in healthcare settings—the step that occurs after IPV victimization is identified by a medical provider through a screening tool. Three research databases—Criminal Justice Abstracts, PubMed, and PsycINFO—were searched for literature published between 2012 and 2022, using the key terms “intimate partner violence,” “screen*,” and “refer*.” Sources ( n = 265) were screened using three primary eligibility requirements: (a) an adult was the primary victim of IPV, (b) a screening and referral process occurred in a healthcare setting by a healthcare professional who routinely conducted screenings, and (c) a referral process, the period after IPV was positively identified through the use of a screener, was explored. After removing 172 articles during initial abstract screening and another 10 articles after full text review, 36 studies compromised the final dataset. Findings show inconsistencies and gaps in the referral process within healthcare settings. While numerous medical bodies recommend IPV screening, our review reveals a lack of consistency in what follows a positive IPV screening, particularly with regard to referral type and frequency. Referral effectiveness was measured in multiple ways across studies, and several barriers to referrals were identified. The findings from this scoping review suggest that future research should untether empirical investigations of the referral process from screening, and researchers should work with practitioners to explore the effect of consistent referrals with patient follow-ups.
医疗机构内亲密伴侣暴力转诊的范围审查
亲密伴侣暴力是一个重大的公共卫生问题,医疗提供者可以通过确定受影响的患者并提供适当的转诊来帮助解决这一问题。此范围审查检查医疗机构中的IPV转诊-在医疗提供者通过筛选工具确定IPV受害后发生的步骤。三个研究数据库——刑事司法文摘、PubMed和psyinfo——检索了2012年至2022年间发表的文献,关键词是“亲密伴侣暴力”、“屏幕”和“参考”。根据三个主要资格要求对来源(n = 265)进行筛查:(a)成人是IPV的主要受害者,(b)在医疗保健环境中由定期进行筛查的医疗保健专业人员进行筛查和转诊过程,以及(c)通过使用筛查器确定IPV后的转诊过程进行了探讨。在最初的摘要筛选中删除了172篇文章,在全文审查后又删除了10篇文章,有36篇研究破坏了最终的数据集。调查结果显示,在医疗机构的转诊过程中存在不一致和差距。虽然许多医疗机构建议进行IPV筛查,但我们的综述显示,IPV筛查阳性后的治疗缺乏一致性,特别是在转诊类型和频率方面。转诊效果在研究中以多种方式测量,并确定了转诊的几个障碍。这一范围审查的结果表明,未来的研究应将转诊过程的实证调查从筛查中解脱出来,研究人员应与从业人员合作,探索一致的转诊与患者随访的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信