Evaluation of local and systemic photobiomodulation in only single-implant insertion: a randomized clinical trial.

Daniel Sartorelli Pucca, Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro
{"title":"Evaluation of local and systemic photobiomodulation in only single-implant insertion: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Daniel Sartorelli Pucca, Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01424-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of local and systemic photobiomodulation (PBM-T) after dental surgery for single-tooth implant placement in healed sites.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients were included and randomly assigned to 2 groups: PBM-T (n = 26), with local and systemic PBM-T application immediately after implant site drilling and suturing; and control group (n = 25), with PBM-T simulation. The parameters used for local PBM-T were low-intensity laser diode (Therapy EC, DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), 1 J of energy per point for 10 s, energy density of 10.20 J/cm², output spot of 0.09842 cm², infrared wavelength of 808 nm and power of 100 mW/cm². Systemic PBM-T was performed using the same low-intensity laser diode. Patients received a single 10-minute systemic transdermal irradiation over the radial artery immediately after suturing, with a total energy of 60 J, energy density of 306.12 J/cm², wavelength of 660 nm, and power of 100 mW. Postoperative pain via visual analog scale (VAS), analgesic use, healing, and quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were assessed. Results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Student-Newman-Keuls) and chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the control and PBM-T groups (p = 0.5217). The number of analgesics taken by participants in the control group was 2.37 times higher than that taken by the PBM-T group. A significant difference in healing grades was observed between the control and PBM-T groups at both the 3-day and 7-day assessments (p = 0.0029 and p = 0.0002, respectively), with the PBM-T group demonstrating marked improvement. There was no negative impact on quality of life at any point after implant placement in the PBM-T group, as all OHIP-14 scores remained lower than those obtained before surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined use of local and systemic PBM-T decreased the need for postoperative analgesics, enhanced postoperative healing, and improved quality of life for patients undergoing single-tooth implant placement in healed sites.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The clinical application of systemic PBM-T enhances the effects of local PBM-T after dental surgery for implant placement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), with the identifier RBR-7f42fs5, on Nov 30, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01424-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of local and systemic photobiomodulation (PBM-T) after dental surgery for single-tooth implant placement in healed sites.

Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients were included and randomly assigned to 2 groups: PBM-T (n = 26), with local and systemic PBM-T application immediately after implant site drilling and suturing; and control group (n = 25), with PBM-T simulation. The parameters used for local PBM-T were low-intensity laser diode (Therapy EC, DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), 1 J of energy per point for 10 s, energy density of 10.20 J/cm², output spot of 0.09842 cm², infrared wavelength of 808 nm and power of 100 mW/cm². Systemic PBM-T was performed using the same low-intensity laser diode. Patients received a single 10-minute systemic transdermal irradiation over the radial artery immediately after suturing, with a total energy of 60 J, energy density of 306.12 J/cm², wavelength of 660 nm, and power of 100 mW. Postoperative pain via visual analog scale (VAS), analgesic use, healing, and quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were assessed. Results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Student-Newman-Keuls) and chi-square test.

Results: There was no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the control and PBM-T groups (p = 0.5217). The number of analgesics taken by participants in the control group was 2.37 times higher than that taken by the PBM-T group. A significant difference in healing grades was observed between the control and PBM-T groups at both the 3-day and 7-day assessments (p = 0.0029 and p = 0.0002, respectively), with the PBM-T group demonstrating marked improvement. There was no negative impact on quality of life at any point after implant placement in the PBM-T group, as all OHIP-14 scores remained lower than those obtained before surgery.

Conclusions: The combined use of local and systemic PBM-T decreased the need for postoperative analgesics, enhanced postoperative healing, and improved quality of life for patients undergoing single-tooth implant placement in healed sites.

Clinical relevance: The clinical application of systemic PBM-T enhances the effects of local PBM-T after dental surgery for implant placement.

Trial registration number: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), with the identifier RBR-7f42fs5, on Nov 30, 2023.

评估局部和全身光生物调节仅在单一植入物插入:一项随机临床试验。
目的:评价局部和全身光生物调节(PBM-T)对口腔手术后愈合部位单牙种植体的影响。材料和方法:纳入51例患者,随机分为2组:PBM-T组(n = 26),种植体钻孔缝合后立即局部和全身应用PBM-T;对照组(n = 25),采用PBM-T模拟。局部PBM-T的参数为低强度激光二极管(Therapy EC, DMC, s o Carlos, SP, Brazil),每点能量1 J,持续10 s,能量密度10.20 J/cm²,输出光斑0.09842 cm²,红外波长808 nm,功率100 mW/cm²。使用相同的低强度激光二极管进行全身PBM-T。患者在缝合后立即对桡动脉进行单次10分钟的全身透皮照射,总能量为60 J,能量密度为306.12 J/cm²,波长为660 nm,功率为100 mW。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后疼痛,使用镇痛药,愈合和使用口腔健康影响量表(OHIP-14)评估生活质量。结果采用Kruskal-Wallis检验(Student-Newman-Keuls)和卡方检验进行分析。结果:两组患者VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.5217)。对照组受试者使用镇痛药的次数是PBM-T组的2.37倍。在3天和7天的评估中,观察到对照组和PBM-T组之间的愈合等级有显著差异(p = 0.0029和p = 0.0002),其中PBM-T组表现出明显的改善。PBM-T组在种植体放置后的任何时间点都没有对生活质量产生负面影响,因为所有OHIP-14评分仍然低于术前。结论:局部和全身PBM-T联合使用减少了术后镇痛的需要,促进了术后愈合,改善了在愈合部位进行单牙种植体放置的患者的生活质量。临床意义:全身性PBM-T的临床应用增强了牙术后局部PBM-T的效果。试验注册号:巴西临床试验注册中心(ReBEC),标识符为RBR-7f42fs5,于2023年11月30日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信