Navigating the silence: reconsidering treatment paradigms in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Konstantinos Karampinos, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Anastasios Apostolos, Leonidas Koliastasis, Ioannis Kachrimanidis, Panayotis Vlachakis, Odysseas Katsaros, Sotirios Tsalamandris, Antonios Karanasos, Maria Drakopoulou, Andreas Synetos, George Latsios, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Toutouzas
{"title":"Navigating the silence: reconsidering treatment paradigms in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.","authors":"Konstantinos Karampinos, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Anastasios Apostolos, Leonidas Koliastasis, Ioannis Kachrimanidis, Panayotis Vlachakis, Odysseas Katsaros, Sotirios Tsalamandris, Antonios Karanasos, Maria Drakopoulou, Andreas Synetos, George Latsios, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Toutouzas","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic stenosis (AS) remains the leading valvular heart disease worldwide, affecting up to 5% of older adults and posing a significant risk if left untreated. The evolution of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its expanding indications for symptomatic patients with severe AS, coupled with the evolving understanding of the pathophysiology and natural history of AS, have heightened the focus on asymptomatic patients with severe AS. Although current clinical practice guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) therapy in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (ASAS) only in specific clinical settings, recent studies have challenged traditional treatment paradigms, advocating for a more individualized strategy, particularly for patients exhibiting high-risk characteristics. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of ASAS, focusing on the intricacies of its clinical management, novel risk-stratification modalities, and predictors of symptom onset and disease progression. We also determine the role of echocardiography in assessing AS severity, highlighting inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria and the need for supplementary testing. Evolving and recently published randomized controlled trials-namely EARLY-TAVR, EVoLVeD, and TAVR-UNLOAD-randomizing asymptomatic patients to early intervention or a watchful waiting strategy provide significant evidence that has the potential to change treatment paradigms, lower the threshold for intervention, and pave the way for more individualized management strategies in ASAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520639,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2025.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) remains the leading valvular heart disease worldwide, affecting up to 5% of older adults and posing a significant risk if left untreated. The evolution of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its expanding indications for symptomatic patients with severe AS, coupled with the evolving understanding of the pathophysiology and natural history of AS, have heightened the focus on asymptomatic patients with severe AS. Although current clinical practice guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) therapy in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (ASAS) only in specific clinical settings, recent studies have challenged traditional treatment paradigms, advocating for a more individualized strategy, particularly for patients exhibiting high-risk characteristics. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of ASAS, focusing on the intricacies of its clinical management, novel risk-stratification modalities, and predictors of symptom onset and disease progression. We also determine the role of echocardiography in assessing AS severity, highlighting inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria and the need for supplementary testing. Evolving and recently published randomized controlled trials-namely EARLY-TAVR, EVoLVeD, and TAVR-UNLOAD-randomizing asymptomatic patients to early intervention or a watchful waiting strategy provide significant evidence that has the potential to change treatment paradigms, lower the threshold for intervention, and pave the way for more individualized management strategies in ASAS.

在沉默中航行:重新考虑无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗模式。
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)仍然是世界范围内主要的瓣膜性心脏病,影响多达5%的老年人,如果不及时治疗,将造成重大风险。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的发展及其对有症状的严重AS患者适应症的扩大,加上对AS病理生理和自然史的不断了解,使得对无症状的严重AS患者的关注日益增加。尽管目前的临床实践指南建议仅在特定的临床环境下对无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄(ASAS)进行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗,但最近的研究挑战了传统的治疗模式,提倡更个性化的治疗策略,特别是对表现出高风险特征的患者。在这篇综述中,我们对ASAS进行了深入分析,重点关注其临床管理的复杂性、新的风险分层模式、症状发作和疾病进展的预测因素,同时也深入探讨了超声心动图在评估AS严重程度中的作用,强调了诊断标准的不一致性和补充检测的必要性。不断发展和最近发表的随机对照试验-即early - tavr, EVoLVeD和TAVR-UNLOAD-将无症状患者随机分配到早期干预或观察等待策略,提供了重要的证据,有可能改变治疗范例,降低干预门槛,并为ASAS更个性化的管理策略铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信