Impact of automated insulin delivery on subjective and objective sleep in children and young adults with very high HbA1c: Sleep outcomes from the CO-PILOT randomised controlled trial

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Venus R. Michaels, Alisa Boucsein, Jillian J. Haszard, Barbara Galland, Kim A. Meredith-Jones, Yongwen Zhou, Shirley D. Jones, Ryan G. Paul, Esko Wiltshire, Craig Jefferies, Martin I. de Bock, Benjamin J. Wheeler
{"title":"Impact of automated insulin delivery on subjective and objective sleep in children and young adults with very high HbA1c: Sleep outcomes from the CO-PILOT randomised controlled trial","authors":"Venus R. Michaels,&nbsp;Alisa Boucsein,&nbsp;Jillian J. Haszard,&nbsp;Barbara Galland,&nbsp;Kim A. Meredith-Jones,&nbsp;Yongwen Zhou,&nbsp;Shirley D. Jones,&nbsp;Ryan G. Paul,&nbsp;Esko Wiltshire,&nbsp;Craig Jefferies,&nbsp;Martin I. de Bock,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Wheeler","doi":"10.1111/dme.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess how automated insulin delivery (AID) impacts sleep in young people with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemia (HbA1c ≥ 69 mmol/mol).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing AID to usual care in 80 participants (aged 7–25 years) over 13 weeks. Sleep was a secondary outcome assessed at baseline and 13 weeks using questionnaires (subjective) and accelerometry (objective).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All participants completed the trial; 64 provided subjective and 40 provided objective sleep data. Participants reported poor subjective sleep quality alongside high levels of sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment at both timepoints. At 13 weeks, sleep-related impairment improved more in the intervention group than in controls (MD = −4.7; 95% CI = −8.7, −0.8; <i>p</i> = 0.02), with no between-group differences in other subjective measures. Accelerometry data showed the intervention group spent 21 more minutes awake after sleep onset (WASO) (MD = 21; 95% CI = 1, 41; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and experienced a 4 percentage point decline in sleep efficiency (MD = −4.2; 95% CI = −8.0, −0.3; <i>p</i> = 0.03), compared to controls after 13 weeks. These results paralleled substantial improvements in HbA1c for intervention participants compared to controls (MD = −34 mmol/mol; 95% CI = −43, −25; <i>p</i>-value &lt;0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although AID improved some subjective sleep aspects, sleep efficiency reduced and WASO increased. The relationship between glycaemia and sleep remains unclear, suggesting that effective sleep improvement in young people with T1D may require multifactorial approaches extending beyond improving glycaemia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"42 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess how automated insulin delivery (AID) impacts sleep in young people with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemia (HbA1c ≥ 69 mmol/mol).

Methods

We conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing AID to usual care in 80 participants (aged 7–25 years) over 13 weeks. Sleep was a secondary outcome assessed at baseline and 13 weeks using questionnaires (subjective) and accelerometry (objective).

Results

All participants completed the trial; 64 provided subjective and 40 provided objective sleep data. Participants reported poor subjective sleep quality alongside high levels of sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment at both timepoints. At 13 weeks, sleep-related impairment improved more in the intervention group than in controls (MD = −4.7; 95% CI = −8.7, −0.8; p = 0.02), with no between-group differences in other subjective measures. Accelerometry data showed the intervention group spent 21 more minutes awake after sleep onset (WASO) (MD = 21; 95% CI = 1, 41; p = 0.04) and experienced a 4 percentage point decline in sleep efficiency (MD = −4.2; 95% CI = −8.0, −0.3; p = 0.03), compared to controls after 13 weeks. These results paralleled substantial improvements in HbA1c for intervention participants compared to controls (MD = −34 mmol/mol; 95% CI = −43, −25; p-value <0.001).

Conclusion

Although AID improved some subjective sleep aspects, sleep efficiency reduced and WASO increased. The relationship between glycaemia and sleep remains unclear, suggesting that effective sleep improvement in young people with T1D may require multifactorial approaches extending beyond improving glycaemia.

Abstract Image

自动胰岛素输送对HbA1c非常高的儿童和年轻人主观和客观睡眠的影响:来自CO-PILOT随机对照试验的睡眠结果
目的:评估自动胰岛素输送(AID)如何影响1型糖尿病和亚理想血糖(HbA1c≥69 mmol/mol)的年轻人的睡眠。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了80名参与者(7-25岁)在13周内的AID和常规护理。睡眠是在基线和13周时使用问卷(主观)和加速度计(客观)评估的次要结果。结果:所有受试者均完成试验;64人提供主观睡眠数据,40人提供客观睡眠数据。在两个时间点,参与者都报告了较差的主观睡眠质量,以及高水平的睡眠障碍和睡眠相关障碍。13周时,干预组睡眠相关障碍的改善程度高于对照组(MD = -4.7;95% ci = -8.7, -0.8;P = 0.02),其他主观指标组间无差异。加速度计数据显示,干预组在睡眠开始(WASO)后醒着的时间多21分钟(MD = 21;95% ci = 1,41;p = 0.04),睡眠效率下降4个百分点(MD = -4.2;95% ci = -8.0, -0.3;P = 0.03),与13周后的对照组相比。与对照组相比,这些结果与干预参与者的HbA1c有显著改善(MD = -34 mmol/mol;95% ci = -43, -25;结论:虽然AID改善了一些主观睡眠方面,但睡眠效率降低,WASO增加。血糖和睡眠之间的关系尚不清楚,这表明有效改善年轻T1D患者的睡眠可能需要多因素的方法,而不仅仅是改善血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信