Oral Health Fatalism and Oral Health Self-Efficacy in Caregivers of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Using Data From a Longitudinal Interventional Study.

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-15
Kimberly M P Gibbs, Kimberly J Hammersmith, Kevin G Stephenson, Jin Peng, Paul S Casamassimo, Eric M Butter, Rachel M Fenning, Robin B Steinberg-Epstein
{"title":"Oral Health Fatalism and Oral Health Self-Efficacy in Caregivers of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Using Data From a Longitudinal Interventional Study.","authors":"Kimberly M P Gibbs, Kimberly J Hammersmith, Kevin G Stephenson, Jin Peng, Paul S Casamassimo, Eric M Butter, Rachel M Fenning, Robin B Steinberg-Epstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate changes over time in oral health fatalism (OHF) and oral health self-efficacy (OHSE) in the context of an intervention, in caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). <b>Methods:</b> This secondary analysis used questionnaire data from a parent study of 118 Medicaid-eligible families of children with ASD enrolled in a longitudinal, multi-site randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of a novel parent training (PT) intervention relative to psychoeducational toolkit for improving home oral hygiene and dental health. OHF and OHSE belief endorsements were evaluated at baseline, three months, and six months. <b>Results:</b> At baseline, 25 percent of caregivers disagreed with the OHF-endorsing statement \"Most children eventually develop dental cavities,\" and 11 percent did not report confidence with OHSE statements. At six months, 34 percent did not endorse OHF and five percent did not report confidence with OHSE. Using the generalized linear mixed model, the percent change from baseline to six months in caregivers disagreeing with OHF and endorsing OHSE was significant (P<0.05). A repeated mea- sures analysis of variance test determined the relationship between the effects of treatment and time on OHF and OHSE. No difference was found in OHF and OHSE beliefs over time between groups (P>0.05); however, a significant effect was found on OHF change over time within subjects (P<0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> There was no statistically significant difference in endorsement of OHF or OHSE between groups at six months. However, within all subjects, OHF beliefs became less endorsed and OHSE confidence improved over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"47 3","pages":"151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate changes over time in oral health fatalism (OHF) and oral health self-efficacy (OHSE) in the context of an intervention, in caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: This secondary analysis used questionnaire data from a parent study of 118 Medicaid-eligible families of children with ASD enrolled in a longitudinal, multi-site randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of a novel parent training (PT) intervention relative to psychoeducational toolkit for improving home oral hygiene and dental health. OHF and OHSE belief endorsements were evaluated at baseline, three months, and six months. Results: At baseline, 25 percent of caregivers disagreed with the OHF-endorsing statement "Most children eventually develop dental cavities," and 11 percent did not report confidence with OHSE statements. At six months, 34 percent did not endorse OHF and five percent did not report confidence with OHSE. Using the generalized linear mixed model, the percent change from baseline to six months in caregivers disagreeing with OHF and endorsing OHSE was significant (P<0.05). A repeated mea- sures analysis of variance test determined the relationship between the effects of treatment and time on OHF and OHSE. No difference was found in OHF and OHSE beliefs over time between groups (P>0.05); however, a significant effect was found on OHF change over time within subjects (P<0.05). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in endorsement of OHF or OHSE between groups at six months. However, within all subjects, OHF beliefs became less endorsed and OHSE confidence improved over time.

自闭症谱系障碍儿童照顾者的口腔健康宿命论与口腔健康自我效能感:来自纵向干预研究的数据
目的:评估干预背景下自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童护理人员口腔健康宿命论(OHF)和口腔健康自我效能感(OHSE)随时间的变化。方法:本二次分析使用了来自118个符合医疗补助条件的ASD儿童家庭的问卷调查数据,这些家庭参加了一项纵向、多地点随机临床试验,测试了一种新型父母培训(PT)干预相对于心理教育工具包改善家庭口腔卫生和牙齿健康的效果。在基线、3个月和6个月时对OHF和OHSE信念背书进行评估。结果:在基线时,25%的护理人员不同意OHSE认可的声明“大多数儿童最终会出现蛀牙”,11%的人对OHSE声明没有信心。六个月时,34%的人不支持OHF, 5%的人对OHSE没有信心。采用广义线性混合模型,从基线到6个月,不同意OHF和支持OHSE的护理人员百分比变化显著(P0.05);然而,在受试者中发现OHF随时间变化的显著影响(p结论:6个月时两组之间对OHF或OHSE的认可没有统计学意义上的差异。然而,在所有受试者中,随着时间的推移,OHSE信念变得越来越不被认可,OHSE信心也有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信