Surgical options for advanced otosclerosis.

Stefano Berrettini, Francesco Lazzerini, Luca Bruschini, Lorena Di Girolami, Silvia Capobianco, Davide Bernacca, Francesca Forli
{"title":"Surgical options for advanced otosclerosis.","authors":"Stefano Berrettini, Francesco Lazzerini, Luca Bruschini, Lorena Di Girolami, Silvia Capobianco, Davide Bernacca, Francesca Forli","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1_3-45-2025-A1338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of advanced otosclerosis (AO) has evolved over the past 20 years with the availability of cochlear implant (CI) in addition to stapes surgery. Both procedures are reliable treatment options for AO with similar success rates and currently there are no standard guidelines regarding the surgical treatment of AO. The aim of this paper is to report the outcomes and complications of a series of patients with AO submitted to CI at our Institution. An extensive review of the literature is also provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study group was composed of 31 adult patients affected by AO, consecutively submitted to CI at our Institution. Postoperative results and complications were compared to those of a homogeneous control group of adult implanted patients, affected by post-verbal sensorineural hearing loss due to other aetiologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in both groups achieved satisfactory results in terms of speech perception in quiet and with background noise after CI, without no significant differences. The rate of complications in the study group was 15%, which is similar to literature reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with AO, the decision between stapes surgery and CI must be personalised and well-considered, taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient and the potential risks and benefits of each option.</p>","PeriodicalId":520544,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","volume":"45 Suppl. 1","pages":"S53-S60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1_3-45-2025-A1338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Management of advanced otosclerosis (AO) has evolved over the past 20 years with the availability of cochlear implant (CI) in addition to stapes surgery. Both procedures are reliable treatment options for AO with similar success rates and currently there are no standard guidelines regarding the surgical treatment of AO. The aim of this paper is to report the outcomes and complications of a series of patients with AO submitted to CI at our Institution. An extensive review of the literature is also provided.

Methods: The study group was composed of 31 adult patients affected by AO, consecutively submitted to CI at our Institution. Postoperative results and complications were compared to those of a homogeneous control group of adult implanted patients, affected by post-verbal sensorineural hearing loss due to other aetiologies.

Results: Patients in both groups achieved satisfactory results in terms of speech perception in quiet and with background noise after CI, without no significant differences. The rate of complications in the study group was 15%, which is similar to literature reports.

Conclusions: In patients with AO, the decision between stapes surgery and CI must be personalised and well-considered, taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient and the potential risks and benefits of each option.

晚期耳硬化的手术选择。
目的:在过去的20年里,随着耳蜗植入(CI)和镫骨手术的发展,晚期耳硬化(AO)的治疗已经发生了变化。这两种方法都是治疗AO的可靠选择,成功率相似,目前尚无关于AO手术治疗的标准指南。这篇论文的目的是报告一系列在我院接受CI治疗的AO患者的预后和并发症。还提供了广泛的文献综述。方法:研究组由31例成年AO患者组成,这些患者在我院连续接受CI治疗。将术后结果和并发症与由其他病因引起的言语后感音神经性听力损失的成人植入式耳蜗患者的同类对照组进行比较。结果:两组患者CI后在安静和有背景噪音情况下的言语感知均获得满意的结果,无显著差异。研究组并发症发生率为15%,与文献报道相似。结论:对于AO患者,在镫骨手术和CI之间的决定必须个性化和充分考虑,考虑到患者的个体特征以及每种选择的潜在风险和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信