Comparative study of Chinese herbal enema combined with Mesalazine versus Mesalazine alone in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Jiao Zhang, Bin Shi, Da Li, Yan Du, Shujiang Gu, Haiying Yao, Dongxuan Zhang, Yuan Tao
{"title":"Comparative study of Chinese herbal enema combined with Mesalazine versus Mesalazine alone in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jiao Zhang, Bin Shi, Da Li, Yan Du, Shujiang Gu, Haiying Yao, Dongxuan Zhang, Yuan Tao","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesalazine is a standard treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of mesalazine combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) enemas is superior to that of mesalazine alone. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of TCM enema hydrotherapy combined with mesalazine for active UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with active UC were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: a combination of mesalazine and TCM enemas and mesalazine alone. Outcome measures included TCM symptom scores, levels of inflammatory markerss [interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)], colonoscopy scores (Baron score), disease activity indices [Sutherland Disease Activity Index (DAI), modified Mayo score], and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Regarding the primary outcomes, the total effective rate in the combination group was 95%, which was significantly higher than the 75% observed in the mesalazine group (p < 0.05). The recurrence rate was lower in the combined group (2.5%) than in the mesalazine group (17.5%) (p < 0.05). Regarding secondary outcomes, the combination group showed higher reductions in TCM symptom scores than the mesalazine group, particularly in the areas of bloody stool, diarrhea, and abdominal pain (p < 0.05). The combined group also showed significantly lower inflammatory markers (IL-8, TNF-α, hs-CRP) and disease activity scores (Baron score, DAI, modified Mayo score) compared to the mesalazine group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TCM enema hydrotherapy and mesalazine therapy led to significant clinical improvement with lower inflammatory responses and reduced recurrence rates in patients with active UC. The combination treatment may be more effective than mesalazine alone and shows promise as a management option for UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mesalazine is a standard treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of mesalazine combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) enemas is superior to that of mesalazine alone. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of TCM enema hydrotherapy combined with mesalazine for active UC.

Methods: Patients with active UC were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: a combination of mesalazine and TCM enemas and mesalazine alone. Outcome measures included TCM symptom scores, levels of inflammatory markerss [interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)], colonoscopy scores (Baron score), disease activity indices [Sutherland Disease Activity Index (DAI), modified Mayo score], and recurrence rates.

Results: A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Regarding the primary outcomes, the total effective rate in the combination group was 95%, which was significantly higher than the 75% observed in the mesalazine group (p < 0.05). The recurrence rate was lower in the combined group (2.5%) than in the mesalazine group (17.5%) (p < 0.05). Regarding secondary outcomes, the combination group showed higher reductions in TCM symptom scores than the mesalazine group, particularly in the areas of bloody stool, diarrhea, and abdominal pain (p < 0.05). The combined group also showed significantly lower inflammatory markers (IL-8, TNF-α, hs-CRP) and disease activity scores (Baron score, DAI, modified Mayo score) compared to the mesalazine group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of TCM enema hydrotherapy and mesalazine therapy led to significant clinical improvement with lower inflammatory responses and reduced recurrence rates in patients with active UC. The combination treatment may be more effective than mesalazine alone and shows promise as a management option for UC.

中药灌肠联合美沙拉嗪与单用美沙拉嗪治疗溃疡性结肠炎的比较研究:一项随机对照试验。
背景:美沙拉嗪是治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的标准药物。然而,目前尚不清楚美沙拉嗪联合中药灌肠是否优于单独使用美沙拉嗪。因此,本研究旨在评价中药灌肠水疗法联合美沙拉嗪治疗活动性UC的临床疗效。方法:将活动性UC患者随机分为美沙拉嗪联合中药灌肠组和美沙拉嗪单用组。预后指标包括中医症状评分、炎症标志物[白细胞介素-8 (IL-8)、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)、高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]水平、结肠镜评分(Baron评分)、疾病活动性指标[Sutherland disease activity Index (DAI)、改良Mayo评分]和复发率。结果:共纳入80例患者。在主要结局方面,联合组总有效率为95%,显著高于美沙拉嗪组的75% (p < 0.05)。联合组复发率(2.5%)低于美沙拉嗪组(17.5%)(p < 0.05)。在次要结局方面,联合用药组中医症状评分的下降幅度高于美沙拉嗪组,特别是在便血、腹泻和腹痛方面(p < 0.05)。联合用药组炎症指标(IL-8、TNF-α、hs-CRP)和疾病活动性评分(Baron评分、DAI评分、改良Mayo评分)均显著低于美沙拉嗪组(p < 0.05)。结论:中药灌肠水疗法联合美沙拉嗪治疗活动性UC患者临床疗效显著,炎症反应降低,复发率降低。联合治疗可能比单独使用美沙拉嗪更有效,并且有望作为UC的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信