Artificial intelligence in symptom management and clinical decision support for palliative care.

Roison Andro Narvaez, Marilane Ferrer, Ralph Antonio Peco, Joylyn Mejilla
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in symptom management and clinical decision support for palliative care.","authors":"Roison Andro Narvaez, Marilane Ferrer, Ralph Antonio Peco, Joylyn Mejilla","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2025.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to palliative care to enhance symptom management and decision support. However, the breadth and implementation strategies of such technologies remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim/objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map empirical studies from 2015 to 2025 that used AI for symptom assessment, mortality prediction and care planning in palliative settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework for scoping reviews and was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 peer-reviewed studies were included, revealing five major themes: (1) Predictive modeling for mortality and referral, enabling early identification of high-risk patients; (2) Automated symptom detection, improving distress surveillance via NLP and decision trees; (3) Wearable and time-series forecasting, allowing real-time physiologic tracking; (4) Workflow integration, demonstrating seamless adoption of AI tools in clinical systems; and (5) Explainability and trust, where interpretable outputs enhanced clinician confidence. These studies showed improved symptom control, timely referrals and interdisciplinary coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI offers promising solutions to enhance palliative nursing through proactive, data-driven care. Ethical implementation, training, and validation are key to sustainable adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"31 6","pages":"294-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to palliative care to enhance symptom management and decision support. However, the breadth and implementation strategies of such technologies remain underexplored.

Aim/objectives: This scoping review aimed to map empirical studies from 2015 to 2025 that used AI for symptom assessment, mortality prediction and care planning in palliative settings.

Methods: The review followed Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework for scoping reviews and was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: A total of 12 peer-reviewed studies were included, revealing five major themes: (1) Predictive modeling for mortality and referral, enabling early identification of high-risk patients; (2) Automated symptom detection, improving distress surveillance via NLP and decision trees; (3) Wearable and time-series forecasting, allowing real-time physiologic tracking; (4) Workflow integration, demonstrating seamless adoption of AI tools in clinical systems; and (5) Explainability and trust, where interpretable outputs enhanced clinician confidence. These studies showed improved symptom control, timely referrals and interdisciplinary coordination.

Conclusion: AI offers promising solutions to enhance palliative nursing through proactive, data-driven care. Ethical implementation, training, and validation are key to sustainable adoption.

人工智能在姑息治疗症状管理和临床决策支持中的应用。
背景:人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于姑息治疗,以增强症状管理和决策支持。然而,这些技术的广度和实施策略仍未得到充分探索。目的/目标:本范围审查旨在绘制2015年至2025年在姑息治疗环境中使用人工智能进行症状评估、死亡率预测和护理计划的实证研究。方法:该综述遵循Arksey和O'Malley的五阶段范围评价框架,并根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报道。采用混合方法评价工具对纳入的研究进行评价。结果:共纳入12项同行评议研究,揭示了五大主题:(1)死亡率和转诊预测建模,实现了高危患者的早期识别;(2)自动症状检测,通过NLP和决策树改进遇险监测;(3)可穿戴和时间序列预测,实现实时生理跟踪;(4)工作流集成,展示AI工具在临床系统中的无缝应用;(5)可解释性和信任,其中可解释的输出增强了临床医生的信心。这些研究显示改善症状控制,及时转诊和跨学科协调。结论:人工智能通过主动、数据驱动的护理,为加强姑息护理提供了有希望的解决方案。道德执行、培训和验证是可持续采用的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信