Differential Association of PET-Derived Rest and Stress Myocardial Blood Flow with Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Ahmed Sayed, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Mouaz Al-Mallah
{"title":"Differential Association of PET-Derived Rest and Stress Myocardial Blood Flow with Cardiovascular Outcomes.","authors":"Ahmed Sayed, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Mouaz Al-Mallah","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.125.269457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there is strong evidence for the prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), there are fewer data on the prognostic implications of its constituents: myocardial blood flow at rest (MBF<sub>rest</sub>) and stress (MBF<sub>stress</sub>). <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive patients undergoing <sup>82</sup>Rb PET imaging with regadenoson stress testing at a tertiary care center between August 2019 and August 2024 were included in this study. The 2 coprimary outcomes were a composite of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization and a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) or late revascularization. Multivariable Andersen-Gill Cox models with robust variance estimators were used to incorporate recurrent events. Outcomes were modeled as a smooth function of MBF<sub>stress</sub> and MBF<sub>rest</sub>, with restricted cubic splines to allow nonlinearity. <b>Results:</b> The analysis included 8,131 consecutive patients (median age of 68 y; 46.1% were women; median follow-up of 520 d (interquartile range, 186-921 d), among whom 471 deaths, 828 HF hospitalizations, 164 MIs, and 429 late revascularizations occurred. After adjusting for the relevant covariates, an MFR of 2 achieved through a lower MBF<sub>rest</sub> was associated with a significantly lower incidence of death and HF hospitalization, whereas an MFR of 2 achieved through a greater MBF<sub>stress</sub> was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MI and late revascularization. Assessments of the partial χ<sup>2</sup> statistic, which measures the importance of predictors, similarly confirmed that MBF<sub>rest</sub> was more important for predicting death or HF hospitalization whereas MBF<sub>stress</sub> was more important for predicting MI or late revascularization. <b>Conclusion:</b> Measurements of absolute myocardial blood flow offer complementary prognostic value to MFR. A diminished MBF<sub>stress</sub> may signal a greater risk of future ischemic outcomes, whereas an elevated MBF<sub>rest</sub> may signal a greater risk of future death or HF hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.269457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there is strong evidence for the prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), there are fewer data on the prognostic implications of its constituents: myocardial blood flow at rest (MBFrest) and stress (MBFstress). Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing 82Rb PET imaging with regadenoson stress testing at a tertiary care center between August 2019 and August 2024 were included in this study. The 2 coprimary outcomes were a composite of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization and a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) or late revascularization. Multivariable Andersen-Gill Cox models with robust variance estimators were used to incorporate recurrent events. Outcomes were modeled as a smooth function of MBFstress and MBFrest, with restricted cubic splines to allow nonlinearity. Results: The analysis included 8,131 consecutive patients (median age of 68 y; 46.1% were women; median follow-up of 520 d (interquartile range, 186-921 d), among whom 471 deaths, 828 HF hospitalizations, 164 MIs, and 429 late revascularizations occurred. After adjusting for the relevant covariates, an MFR of 2 achieved through a lower MBFrest was associated with a significantly lower incidence of death and HF hospitalization, whereas an MFR of 2 achieved through a greater MBFstress was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MI and late revascularization. Assessments of the partial χ2 statistic, which measures the importance of predictors, similarly confirmed that MBFrest was more important for predicting death or HF hospitalization whereas MBFstress was more important for predicting MI or late revascularization. Conclusion: Measurements of absolute myocardial blood flow offer complementary prognostic value to MFR. A diminished MBFstress may signal a greater risk of future ischemic outcomes, whereas an elevated MBFrest may signal a greater risk of future death or HF hospitalization.

pet衍生的休息和应激心肌血流量与心血管结局的差异关联。
虽然有强有力的证据表明心肌血流储备(MFR)的预后价值,但关于其成分:静息心肌血流(MBFrest)和应激心肌血流(MBFstress)的预后意义的数据较少。方法:本研究纳入2019年8月至2024年8月在某三级保健中心连续接受82Rb PET成像和regadenoson压力测试的患者。2个主要结局是死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合结局和心肌梗死(MI)或晚期血运重建术的复合结局。使用具有稳健方差估计的多变量Andersen-Gill Cox模型来合并复发事件。结果建模为mbf应力和mbf的光滑函数,并使用限制三次样条以允许非线性。结果:分析纳入了8131例连续患者(中位年龄68岁;女性占46.1%;中位随访时间为520天(四分位数范围为186-921天),其中471例死亡,828例心衰住院,164例心肌梗死,429例晚期血循环重建术。在对相关协变量进行调整后,通过较低的mbst达到2的MFR与较低的死亡发生率和HF住院率相关,而通过较高的mbst达到2的MFR与较低的心肌梗死发生率和较晚的血流量重建相关。对部分χ2统计量的评估(衡量预测因素的重要性)同样证实,MBFrest对于预测死亡或HF住院更重要,而MBFstress对于预测心肌梗死或晚期血运重建更重要。结论:心肌绝对血流量测量对MFR的预后有补充价值。mbf压力降低可能预示着未来缺血性结局的风险增加,而mbf压力升高可能预示着未来死亡或HF住院的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信