Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measures of Voltage Amplitude and Dominant Frequency Associated With the Stroop Color-Conflict Cognitive-Interference Task in Medical Students.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.86277
Darine Alame, Merin Chandanathil, Brianna Easton, Shweta Verma, N'Kozi Bennett, Nicole R Moldovan, Denise Crowley, Richard M Millis
{"title":"Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measures of Voltage Amplitude and Dominant Frequency Associated With the Stroop Color-Conflict Cognitive-Interference Task in Medical Students.","authors":"Darine Alame, Merin Chandanathil, Brianna Easton, Shweta Verma, N'Kozi Bennett, Nicole R Moldovan, Denise Crowley, Richard M Millis","doi":"10.7759/cureus.86277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Cognitive load theory postulates that effective learning depends on balancing a learner's cognitive capacity with cognitive load. Medical students are required to answer complex multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that involve complex vignettes and distractors, in 90 s per question. This demands the ability to rapidly process information, filter out irrelevant data, and suppress incorrect yet tempting answer choices. The Stroop color-conflict test represents a cognitive interference task that may simulate time-limited conditions for answering MCQs. This exploratory study tested whether selected quantitative electroencephalographic (qEEG) indices could behave as biomarkers that remain stable across sequential Stroop loads. Methods Thirteen healthy adults (11 retained after outlier removal) completed a midline (Fz, Cz, Pz) qEEG protocol comprising (i) 5 minutes of resting baseline, (ii) 5 minutes after a congruent low-load (LL) Stroop test and (iii) 5 minutes after an incongruent high-load (HL) Stroop test. Voltage amplitude (µV) and mode frequency (Hz) were extracted for theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), low-beta (12-20 Hz) and high-beta (20-30 Hz) bandwidths. Derived ratios, θ/β, α/β, θ/α and high-β/low-β, plus a frontal-posterior theta ratio (Fz/Pz), were analyzed with paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA. Outliers were removed using a strict |z| > 2 threshold applied to every site-specific metric. Results Significant Baseline → LL load sensitivity was found for alpha-dominant (mode) frequency. The dominant frequencies, voltage amplitudes and voltage amplitude ratios for the other bandwidths (θ, low-β, high-β) were nonsignificant and therefore not load sensitive. None of the markers exhibited significant changes from LL → HL. Alpha voltage amplitudes were found to be higher at Pz than at Cz and Fz, exhibiting posterior dominant site sensitivity. High-β/low-β and θ/β ratios were found to be higher at Fz and Cz than at Pz, exhibiting frontal dominant site sensitivity. Conclusion These findings suggest significant Stroop testing-related qEEG changes in medical students trained to answer complex MCQs under time constraints. Alpha dominant frequency was found to be load sensitive but site insensitive. Load insensitivity of alpha voltage amplitude, θ/β ratio and high-β/low-β ratio at the Cz, Fz and Pz midline recording sites suggests site specificity of these variables. These findings appear to support the hypothesis that the site-specific topographic markers alpha voltage amplitude, θ/β and high-β/low-β ratio may be useful for characterizing responses to Stroop testing. However, the load sensitivity of alpha dominant frequency measured at the Cz, Fz and Pz midline recording sites may be useful for workload tracking to identify and remediate information-processing problems. These preliminary findings should be interpreted cautiously pending larger studies of cognitive loading in other populations of learners trained to take high-stakes, time-limited examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e86277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Cognitive load theory postulates that effective learning depends on balancing a learner's cognitive capacity with cognitive load. Medical students are required to answer complex multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that involve complex vignettes and distractors, in 90 s per question. This demands the ability to rapidly process information, filter out irrelevant data, and suppress incorrect yet tempting answer choices. The Stroop color-conflict test represents a cognitive interference task that may simulate time-limited conditions for answering MCQs. This exploratory study tested whether selected quantitative electroencephalographic (qEEG) indices could behave as biomarkers that remain stable across sequential Stroop loads. Methods Thirteen healthy adults (11 retained after outlier removal) completed a midline (Fz, Cz, Pz) qEEG protocol comprising (i) 5 minutes of resting baseline, (ii) 5 minutes after a congruent low-load (LL) Stroop test and (iii) 5 minutes after an incongruent high-load (HL) Stroop test. Voltage amplitude (µV) and mode frequency (Hz) were extracted for theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), low-beta (12-20 Hz) and high-beta (20-30 Hz) bandwidths. Derived ratios, θ/β, α/β, θ/α and high-β/low-β, plus a frontal-posterior theta ratio (Fz/Pz), were analyzed with paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA. Outliers were removed using a strict |z| > 2 threshold applied to every site-specific metric. Results Significant Baseline → LL load sensitivity was found for alpha-dominant (mode) frequency. The dominant frequencies, voltage amplitudes and voltage amplitude ratios for the other bandwidths (θ, low-β, high-β) were nonsignificant and therefore not load sensitive. None of the markers exhibited significant changes from LL → HL. Alpha voltage amplitudes were found to be higher at Pz than at Cz and Fz, exhibiting posterior dominant site sensitivity. High-β/low-β and θ/β ratios were found to be higher at Fz and Cz than at Pz, exhibiting frontal dominant site sensitivity. Conclusion These findings suggest significant Stroop testing-related qEEG changes in medical students trained to answer complex MCQs under time constraints. Alpha dominant frequency was found to be load sensitive but site insensitive. Load insensitivity of alpha voltage amplitude, θ/β ratio and high-β/low-β ratio at the Cz, Fz and Pz midline recording sites suggests site specificity of these variables. These findings appear to support the hypothesis that the site-specific topographic markers alpha voltage amplitude, θ/β and high-β/low-β ratio may be useful for characterizing responses to Stroop testing. However, the load sensitivity of alpha dominant frequency measured at the Cz, Fz and Pz midline recording sites may be useful for workload tracking to identify and remediate information-processing problems. These preliminary findings should be interpreted cautiously pending larger studies of cognitive loading in other populations of learners trained to take high-stakes, time-limited examinations.

与Stroop颜色冲突认知干扰任务相关的电压振幅和优势频率的定量脑电图测量。
认知负荷理论认为,有效的学习取决于学习者的认知能力与认知负荷之间的平衡。医学生被要求回答复杂的多项选择题(mcq),其中包括复杂的小插曲和干扰,每个问题90秒。这需要快速处理信息,过滤掉不相关的数据,并抑制错误但诱人的答案选择的能力。Stroop颜色冲突测试代表了一个认知干扰任务,可以模拟回答mcq的时间限制条件。这项探索性研究测试了所选择的定量脑电图(qEEG)指数是否可以作为生物标志物,在连续的Stroop负荷中保持稳定。方法13名健康成人(剔除异常值后保留11名)完成了中线(Fz, Cz, Pz) qEEG方案,该方案包括:(i)静息基线5分钟,(ii)一致低负荷(LL) Stroop测试后5分钟,(iii)不一致高负荷(HL) Stroop测试后5分钟。提取theta (4-7 Hz)、alpha (8-12 Hz)、low-beta (12-20 Hz)和high-beta (20-30 Hz)带宽的电压幅值(µV)和模态频率(Hz)。推导比值θ/β、α/β、θ/α和高β/低β,加上额后θ比值(Fz/Pz),采用配对t检验和重复测量方差分析。使用应用于每个站点特定度量的严格|z| |阈值去除异常值。结果基线→LL负载敏感性对α -显性(模式)频率有显著性影响。其他带宽(θ、低-β、高-β)的主导频率、电压幅值和电压幅值比不显著,因此对负载不敏感。从LL→HL,所有标记均无显著变化。α电压幅值在Pz处高于Cz和Fz处,表现出后验优势位点敏感性。Fz和Cz的高β/低β和θ/β比值高于Pz,表现出额侧优势位点的敏感性。结论在接受时间限制下回答复杂mcq训练的医学生中,与Stroop测验相关的qEEG变化显著。α主导频率对负荷敏感,但对位点不敏感。在Cz、Fz和Pz中线记录位点α电压幅值、θ/β比值和高β/低β比值的负荷不敏感表明这些变量具有位点特异性。这些发现似乎支持了一个假设,即特定位点的地形标记α电压幅值、θ/β和高β/低β比可能有助于表征对Stroop测试的响应。然而,在Cz、Fz和Pz中线记录地点测量的α主导频率的负载灵敏度可能对工作负载跟踪有用,以识别和纠正信息处理问题。这些初步发现应谨慎解释,等待更大的研究认知负荷在其他人群的学习者训练参加高风险,有时间限制的考试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信