Clinical Experience With an Aragonite-Based Scaffold Implant for Knee Cartilage Repair: A Multicenter Case Series.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.86127
Nirav H Amin, Scott C Faucett, Charles Qin, Chaitu S Malempati, Ronak M Patel, Christopher P Dougherty, Arnold Lim, Corey Kendall, R Kyle Martin, Cassandra A Lee
{"title":"Clinical Experience With an Aragonite-Based Scaffold Implant for Knee Cartilage Repair: A Multicenter Case Series.","authors":"Nirav H Amin, Scott C Faucett, Charles Qin, Chaitu S Malempati, Ronak M Patel, Christopher P Dougherty, Arnold Lim, Corey Kendall, R Kyle Martin, Cassandra A Lee","doi":"10.7759/cureus.86127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background There is a growing interest in the use of biomaterials to treat chondral and osteochondral knee lesions, given their ability to replicate the biological and functional properties needed for simultaneous cartilage and bone regeneration. A novel aragonite-based, cell-free biomimetic scaffold (CARTIHEAL AGILI-C<sup>TM</sup>, Smith + Nephew, UK) was developed for treating chondral and osteochondral defects in traumatic and osteoarthritic joints. A short-term follow-up study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of this scaffold.  Materials and methods This retrospective review included data from nine centers in the United States (US) between August 22, 2023 and December 30, 2024. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who received the aragonite-based scaffold as standard of care for the treatment of knee chondral/osteochondral lesions in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use were eligible. There were no prespecified exclusion criteria. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiologic assessment of knee cartilage lesions, which informed the development of presurgical plans. A diagnostic arthroscopy was performed before arthrotomy to confirm the radiographic findings obtained for preoperative planning. The primary endpoint was the incidence of early clinical and radiographic complications occurring within at least 30 days after the operation. Secondary endpoints included an assessment of the accuracy of presurgical planning relative to intraoperative findings, proportion of implants determined to be improperly implanted based on the first postoperative X-rays, change in the numeric pain rating score from baseline, and the proportion of patients cleared for various postoperative activities. Results A total of 33 patients (34 knees; mean age, 47.2 years; 18 (52.9%) male) were included. After a mean postoperative follow-up of 45.7 days (standard deviation, 14.4), one patient (2.9%) experienced a postoperative complication (pain, with no associated infection). Success rate was 96.97% (95% CI, 84.24-99.92). In 27 (79.4%) cases, the presurgical plan based on MRI was modified following arthroscopic visualization of the knee joint surface. Postoperative radiography revealed no complications for the 28 patients with data. Mean postoperative numeric pain rating significantly improved from 6.6 at baseline to 3.9 at follow-up (p<0.05). The majority of patients (n=24; 70.6%) were cleared for partial or full weightbearing by the 30-day postoperative follow-up visit.  Conclusions This case series across multiple centers in the US demonstrates the clinical safety and feasibility of aragonite scaffold implantation. The flexibility of the scaffold in accommodating intraoperative findings and the low rate of early complications are encouraging.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e86127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There is a growing interest in the use of biomaterials to treat chondral and osteochondral knee lesions, given their ability to replicate the biological and functional properties needed for simultaneous cartilage and bone regeneration. A novel aragonite-based, cell-free biomimetic scaffold (CARTIHEAL AGILI-CTM, Smith + Nephew, UK) was developed for treating chondral and osteochondral defects in traumatic and osteoarthritic joints. A short-term follow-up study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of this scaffold.  Materials and methods This retrospective review included data from nine centers in the United States (US) between August 22, 2023 and December 30, 2024. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who received the aragonite-based scaffold as standard of care for the treatment of knee chondral/osteochondral lesions in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use were eligible. There were no prespecified exclusion criteria. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiologic assessment of knee cartilage lesions, which informed the development of presurgical plans. A diagnostic arthroscopy was performed before arthrotomy to confirm the radiographic findings obtained for preoperative planning. The primary endpoint was the incidence of early clinical and radiographic complications occurring within at least 30 days after the operation. Secondary endpoints included an assessment of the accuracy of presurgical planning relative to intraoperative findings, proportion of implants determined to be improperly implanted based on the first postoperative X-rays, change in the numeric pain rating score from baseline, and the proportion of patients cleared for various postoperative activities. Results A total of 33 patients (34 knees; mean age, 47.2 years; 18 (52.9%) male) were included. After a mean postoperative follow-up of 45.7 days (standard deviation, 14.4), one patient (2.9%) experienced a postoperative complication (pain, with no associated infection). Success rate was 96.97% (95% CI, 84.24-99.92). In 27 (79.4%) cases, the presurgical plan based on MRI was modified following arthroscopic visualization of the knee joint surface. Postoperative radiography revealed no complications for the 28 patients with data. Mean postoperative numeric pain rating significantly improved from 6.6 at baseline to 3.9 at follow-up (p<0.05). The majority of patients (n=24; 70.6%) were cleared for partial or full weightbearing by the 30-day postoperative follow-up visit.  Conclusions This case series across multiple centers in the US demonstrates the clinical safety and feasibility of aragonite scaffold implantation. The flexibility of the scaffold in accommodating intraoperative findings and the low rate of early complications are encouraging.

文石基支架植入膝关节软骨修复的临床经验:多中心病例系列。
鉴于生物材料能够复制同时进行软骨和骨再生所需的生物学和功能特性,人们对使用生物材料治疗软骨和骨软骨膝关节病变的兴趣日益浓厚。一种新型文石基无细胞仿生支架(CARTIHEAL AGILI-CTM, Smith + Nephew, UK)被开发用于治疗创伤性和骨关节炎关节的软骨和骨软骨缺损。一项短期随访研究旨在评估该支架的安全性和可行性。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了2023年8月22日至2024年12月30日期间来自美国9个中心的数据。成年患者(≥18岁)按照制造商的使用说明接受文石支架作为治疗膝关节软骨/骨软骨病变的标准护理是符合条件的。没有预先规定的排除标准。所有患者均接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查膝关节软骨病变的放射学评估,这为术前计划的制定提供了信息。在关节切开术前进行诊断性关节镜检查,以确认术前计划所获得的影像学结果。主要终点是术后至少30天内发生的早期临床和影像学并发症的发生率。次要终点包括评估术前计划相对于术中发现的准确性,根据术后第一次x光片确定植入物不正确的比例,从基线开始的数字疼痛评分的变化,以及清除各种术后活动的患者比例。结果33例患者(34膝;平均年龄47.2岁;其中男性18例(52.9%)。术后平均随访45.7天(标准差14.4),1例患者(2.9%)出现术后并发症(疼痛,无相关感染)。成功率为96.97% (95% CI, 84.24 ~ 99.92)。在27例(79.4%)病例中,基于MRI的术前计划在关节镜下膝关节表面可视化后进行了修改。术后x线摄影显示28例患者无并发症。术后平均疼痛评分从基线时的6.6分显著改善到随访时的3.9分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信