Left and Right Ventricular Strain in an Adult Brazilian Population from ELSA-Brasil Study: Reference Values and their Determinants.

Eduardo Gatti Pianca, Murilo Foppa, Giulia Bevilacqua Schmitz, Wilson Cañon-Montañez, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Angela Barreto Santiago Santos
{"title":"Left and Right Ventricular Strain in an Adult Brazilian Population from ELSA-Brasil Study: Reference Values and their Determinants.","authors":"Eduardo Gatti Pianca, Murilo Foppa, Giulia Bevilacqua Schmitz, Wilson Cañon-Montañez, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Angela Barreto Santiago Santos","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular functions are important predictors of cardiovascular risk. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) provides superior sensitivity for assessing systolic function compared to traditional parameters, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in various cardiac conditions. However, GLS reference values in diverse populations are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish reference values for LVGLS and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) in a Brazilian multiethnic population without cardiovascular risk factors or disease. We also explore how clinical and echocardiographic factors influence GLS distribution, addressing a gap in global guidelines that often rely on data from homogeneous or geographically distant populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 1,048 participants from the ELSA-Brasil cohort who underwent echocardiography with GLS analysis. A healthy subsample (n = 527) was defined by excluding individuals with cardiovascular or renal disease, hypertension, or diabetes to establish GLS reference ranges. The prevalence of abnormal GLS was assessed, and factors associated with reduced LVGLS and RVFWLS were identified. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the healthy subsample (mean age 50.2 years, 59% female), mean LVGLS was 19.0% (95% confidence interval: 14.3 to 23.8) and RVFWLS was 28.3% (95% confidence interval: 22.3 to 34.3). Females exhibited higher LVGLS and RVFWLS values than males, with no significant age-related differences. Abnormal LVGLS and RVFWLS were observed in 3.8% and 1.6% of participants, respectively. Lower LVGLS was associated with obesity, hypertension, and diabetes; reduced RVFWLS correlated with higher body mass index and LV mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose reference values for LVGLS and RVFWLS in a large Brazilian cohort, highlighting associations with cardiovascular comorbidities and ventricular structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 6","pages":"e20240634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impaired left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular functions are important predictors of cardiovascular risk. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) provides superior sensitivity for assessing systolic function compared to traditional parameters, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in various cardiac conditions. However, GLS reference values in diverse populations are lacking.

Objectives: To establish reference values for LVGLS and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) in a Brazilian multiethnic population without cardiovascular risk factors or disease. We also explore how clinical and echocardiographic factors influence GLS distribution, addressing a gap in global guidelines that often rely on data from homogeneous or geographically distant populations.

Methods: We included 1,048 participants from the ELSA-Brasil cohort who underwent echocardiography with GLS analysis. A healthy subsample (n = 527) was defined by excluding individuals with cardiovascular or renal disease, hypertension, or diabetes to establish GLS reference ranges. The prevalence of abnormal GLS was assessed, and factors associated with reduced LVGLS and RVFWLS were identified. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results: In the healthy subsample (mean age 50.2 years, 59% female), mean LVGLS was 19.0% (95% confidence interval: 14.3 to 23.8) and RVFWLS was 28.3% (95% confidence interval: 22.3 to 34.3). Females exhibited higher LVGLS and RVFWLS values than males, with no significant age-related differences. Abnormal LVGLS and RVFWLS were observed in 3.8% and 1.6% of participants, respectively. Lower LVGLS was associated with obesity, hypertension, and diabetes; reduced RVFWLS correlated with higher body mass index and LV mass.

Conclusions: We propose reference values for LVGLS and RVFWLS in a large Brazilian cohort, highlighting associations with cardiovascular comorbidities and ventricular structure.

来自ELSA-Brasil研究的巴西成年人群左、右心室应变:参考值及其决定因素。
背景:左心室(LV)和右心室功能受损是心血管危险的重要预测因素。与传统参数相比,全局纵向应变(GLS)为评估收缩功能提供了优越的敏感性,提高了各种心脏疾病的诊断准确性。然而,不同人群的GLS参考值缺乏。目的:建立巴西无心血管危险因素或疾病的多民族人群LVGLS和右心室游离壁纵向应变(RVFWLS)的参考值。我们还探讨了临床和超声心动图因素如何影响GLS分布,解决了通常依赖于同质或地理上遥远人群数据的全球指南的差距。方法:我们纳入了来自elsa -巴西队列的1,048名参与者,他们接受了超声心动图和GLS分析。健康亚样本(n = 527)通过排除心血管或肾脏疾病、高血压或糖尿病患者来定义,以建立GLS参考范围。评估异常GLS的患病率,并确定与LVGLS和RVFWLS降低相关的因素。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:在健康亚样本(平均年龄50.2岁,59%女性)中,LVGLS均值为19.0%(95%可信区间:14.3 ~ 23.8),RVFWLS均值为28.3%(95%可信区间:22.3 ~ 34.3)。女性的LVGLS和RVFWLS值高于男性,但无显著的年龄相关差异。LVGLS和RVFWLS异常的比例分别为3.8%和1.6%。低LVGLS与肥胖、高血压和糖尿病相关;RVFWLS降低与较高的身体质量指数和左室质量相关。结论:我们在一个大型巴西队列中提出LVGLS和RVFWLS的参考值,强调了心血管合并症和心室结构的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信