Can CTA-based Machine Learning Identify Patients for Whom Successful Endovascular Stroke Therapy is Insufficient?

Jerome A Jeevarajan, Yingjun Dong, Anjan Ballekere, Sergio Salazar Marioni, Arash Niktabe, Rania Abdelkhaleq, Sunil A Sheth, Luca Giancardo
{"title":"Can CTA-based Machine Learning Identify Patients for Whom Successful Endovascular Stroke Therapy is Insufficient?","authors":"Jerome A Jeevarajan, Yingjun Dong, Anjan Ballekere, Sergio Salazar Marioni, Arash Niktabe, Rania Abdelkhaleq, Sunil A Sheth, Luca Giancardo","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Despite advances in endovascular stroke therapy (EST) devices and techniques, many patients are left with substantial disability, even if the final infarct volumes (FIVs) remain small. Here, we evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach using pre-treatment CT angiography (CTA) to identify this cohort of patients that may benefit from additional interventions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified consecutive large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS) subjects who underwent EST with successful reperfusion in a multicenter prospective registry cohort. We included only subjects with FIV<30mL and recorded 90-day outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS). A deep learning model was pre-trained and then fine-tuned to predict 90-day mRS 0-2 using pre-treatment CTA images (DSN-CTA model). The primary outcome was the predictive performance of the DSNCTA model compared to a logistic regression model with clinical variables, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DSN-CTA model was pre-trained on 1,542 subjects and then fine-tuned and cross-validated with 48 subjects, all of whom underwent EST with TICI 2b-3 reperfusion. Of this cohort, 56.2% of subjects had 90-day mRS 3-6 despite successful EST and FIV<30mL. The DSN-CTA model showed significantly better performance than a model with clinical variables alone when predicting good 90-day mRS (AUROC 0.81 vs 0.492, p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTA-based machine learning model was able to more reliably predict unexpected poor functional outcome after successful EST and small FIV for patients with LVO AIS compared to standard clinical variables. ML models may identify <i>a priori</i> patients in whom EST-based LVO reperfusion alone is insufficient to improve clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AIS= acute ischemic stroke; AUROC= area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; DSN-CTA= DeepSymNet-v3 model; EST= endovascular stroke therapy; FIV= final infarct volume; LVO= large vessel occlusion; ML= machine learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Despite advances in endovascular stroke therapy (EST) devices and techniques, many patients are left with substantial disability, even if the final infarct volumes (FIVs) remain small. Here, we evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach using pre-treatment CT angiography (CTA) to identify this cohort of patients that may benefit from additional interventions.

Materials and methods: We identified consecutive large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS) subjects who underwent EST with successful reperfusion in a multicenter prospective registry cohort. We included only subjects with FIV<30mL and recorded 90-day outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS). A deep learning model was pre-trained and then fine-tuned to predict 90-day mRS 0-2 using pre-treatment CTA images (DSN-CTA model). The primary outcome was the predictive performance of the DSNCTA model compared to a logistic regression model with clinical variables, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: The DSN-CTA model was pre-trained on 1,542 subjects and then fine-tuned and cross-validated with 48 subjects, all of whom underwent EST with TICI 2b-3 reperfusion. Of this cohort, 56.2% of subjects had 90-day mRS 3-6 despite successful EST and FIV<30mL. The DSN-CTA model showed significantly better performance than a model with clinical variables alone when predicting good 90-day mRS (AUROC 0.81 vs 0.492, p=0.006).

Conclusions: The CTA-based machine learning model was able to more reliably predict unexpected poor functional outcome after successful EST and small FIV for patients with LVO AIS compared to standard clinical variables. ML models may identify a priori patients in whom EST-based LVO reperfusion alone is insufficient to improve clinical outcomes.

Abbreviations: AIS= acute ischemic stroke; AUROC= area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; DSN-CTA= DeepSymNet-v3 model; EST= endovascular stroke therapy; FIV= final infarct volume; LVO= large vessel occlusion; ML= machine learning.

基于cta的机器学习能否识别血管内卒中治疗不成功的患者?
背景和目的:尽管血管内卒中治疗(EST)设备和技术取得了进展,但即使最终梗死体积(fiv)仍然很小,许多患者仍留下了严重的残疾。在这里,我们使用预处理CT血管造影(CTA)来评估机器学习(ML)方法的性能,以确定可能从额外干预中受益的这组患者。材料和方法:我们在一项多中心前瞻性登记队列研究中确定了连续大血管闭塞(LVO)急性缺血性卒中(AIS)受试者,他们接受了EST并成功再灌注。结果:DSN-CTA模型对1542名受试者进行了预训练,然后对48名受试者进行了微调和交叉验证,所有受试者都进行了EST和TICI 2b-3再灌注。结论:与标准临床变量相比,基于cta的机器学习模型能够更可靠地预测LVO AIS患者成功EST和小FIV后意想不到的功能不良结果。ML模型可以识别单纯以est为基础的LVO再灌注不足以改善临床结果的先验患者。缩写:AIS=急性缺血性中风;AUROC=受者工作特性曲线下面积;DSN-CTA= DeepSymNet-v3模型;EST=血管内卒中治疗;FIV=最终梗死体积;LVO=大血管闭塞;ML=机器学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信