Barriers and enablers to implementing the UEFA Consensus Statement on Nutrition: insights from sport nutrition practitioners in the English Premier League.

Nessan Costello, Stephanie Roe, Susan H Backhouse, Meghan Rowenna Noelle Bentley
{"title":"Barriers and enablers to implementing the UEFA Consensus Statement on Nutrition: insights from sport nutrition practitioners in the English Premier League.","authors":"Nessan Costello, Stephanie Roe, Susan H Backhouse, Meghan Rowenna Noelle Bentley","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2025.2517055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the importance of evidence-based nutrition in elite football, Premier League players often exhibit sub-optimal dietary behaviours, highlighting the need for improved guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study used the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore sport nutritionists' perceived barriers and enablers to applying the UEFA Consensus Statement on Nutrition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve lead sport nutritionists from English Premier League clubs took part in semi-structured interviews (1 hour ± 44 mins). The interviews were structured using the COM-B and TDF and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six key themes were identified, representing six barriers and two enablers, encompassing all three components of the COM-B model and seven TDF domains. <i>Psychological capability</i> barriers included challenges in changing players' dietary behaviours. <i>Reflective motivation</i> was hindered by doubts regarding the scientific basis of carbohydrate and body composition guidelines, alongside concerns over players' ability to practically adhere to carbohydrate recommendations. <i>Physical and social opportunity</i> barriers involved restricted time and support for ongoing personal and professional development. Practitioners desired greater autonomy over the nutrition service, which was either enabled or constrained by the club' social environment. As an enabler, female practitioners' strong interpersonal skills (<i>psychological capability</i>) supported implementation; however, they also faced gender-related challenges navigating male predominate environments, making the <i>social opportunity</i> for implementation more complex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing nutrition guidelines in elite football is challenging. Overcoming barriers-by boosting practitioner confidence, belief in guidelines, professional development support, and autonomy-is key to improving uptake of UEFA recommendations and enhancing player dietary adherence in the English Premier League.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2025.2517055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of evidence-based nutrition in elite football, Premier League players often exhibit sub-optimal dietary behaviours, highlighting the need for improved guideline implementation.

Purpose: This study used the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore sport nutritionists' perceived barriers and enablers to applying the UEFA Consensus Statement on Nutrition.

Method: Twelve lead sport nutritionists from English Premier League clubs took part in semi-structured interviews (1 hour ± 44 mins). The interviews were structured using the COM-B and TDF and analysed thematically.

Results: Six key themes were identified, representing six barriers and two enablers, encompassing all three components of the COM-B model and seven TDF domains. Psychological capability barriers included challenges in changing players' dietary behaviours. Reflective motivation was hindered by doubts regarding the scientific basis of carbohydrate and body composition guidelines, alongside concerns over players' ability to practically adhere to carbohydrate recommendations. Physical and social opportunity barriers involved restricted time and support for ongoing personal and professional development. Practitioners desired greater autonomy over the nutrition service, which was either enabled or constrained by the club' social environment. As an enabler, female practitioners' strong interpersonal skills (psychological capability) supported implementation; however, they also faced gender-related challenges navigating male predominate environments, making the social opportunity for implementation more complex.

Conclusion: Implementing nutrition guidelines in elite football is challenging. Overcoming barriers-by boosting practitioner confidence, belief in guidelines, professional development support, and autonomy-is key to improving uptake of UEFA recommendations and enhancing player dietary adherence in the English Premier League.

实施欧足联营养共识声明的障碍和推动因素:来自英超联赛运动营养从业者的见解。
背景:尽管基于证据的营养在精英足球中很重要,但英超球员经常表现出次优的饮食行为,这突出了改进指南实施的必要性。目的:本研究使用COM-B模型和理论领域框架(TDF)来探索运动营养学家对应用欧足联营养共识声明的感知障碍和推动因素。方法:12名来自英超俱乐部的首席运动营养学家接受半结构化访谈(1小时±44分钟)。访谈采用COM-B和TDF进行组织,并按主题进行分析。结果:确定了六个关键主题,代表了六个障碍和两个促进因素,涵盖了COM-B模型的所有三个组成部分和七个TDF域。心理能力障碍包括改变玩家饮食行为的挑战。对碳水化合物和身体成分指南的科学基础的怀疑,以及对球员实际遵守碳水化合物建议的能力的担忧,阻碍了反思动机。物质和社会机会障碍涉及对持续的个人和职业发展的时间限制和支持。从业者希望在营养服务方面有更大的自主权,这可能受到俱乐部社会环境的限制,也可能受到限制。作为推动者,女性从业者较强的人际交往能力(心理能力)支持了实施;然而,她们在男性主导的环境中也面临着与性别相关的挑战,这使得实施的社会机会更加复杂。结论:在精英足球运动员中实施营养指南具有挑战性。克服障碍——通过增强从业者的信心、对指导方针的信念、职业发展支持和自主性——是提高欧足联建议的接受度和提高英超球员饮食依从性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信