Noncoronary Sinus Pivot Implantation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valve for Aortic Regurgitation.

Lifan Yang, Zilong Weng, Shasha Chen, Yuan Zhang, Daxin Zhou, Wenzhi Pan, Junbo Ge
{"title":"Noncoronary Sinus Pivot Implantation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valve for Aortic Regurgitation.","authors":"Lifan Yang, Zilong Weng, Shasha Chen, Yuan Zhang, Daxin Zhou, Wenzhi Pan, Junbo Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our initial study suggested that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve for pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR) had a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when the noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) was achieved.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study enrolled patients with PNAR who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves between January 2019 and April 2024, compared the NCPI strategy with the conventional approach, and analyzed factors associated with successful NCPI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 87 patients into an early (conventional) group of patients treated before February 2023 and a late (NCPI strategy) group of patients treated after February 2023. Then the patients were also categorized by successful NCPI and non-NCPI group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The late group had significantly higher device success rates than the early group (92.9% vs 73.3%; P = 0.016) and lower rates of MACE (19.5% vs 51.1%; P = 0.002) and valve-in-valve implantation (4.8% vs 24.4%; P = 0.01). Importantly, NCPI was achieved in 90.5% of patients in the late group compared with only 17.8% in the early group (P < 0.001). The NCPI group had a higher device success rate (93.5% vs 70.7%; P = 0.005) and lower MACE rate (17.4%vs 56.1%; P < 0.001) than the non-NCPI group. NCPI (OR: 6.71; P = 0.032) and aortic angulation (OR: 1.07; P = 0.035) were independent predictors of device success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NCPI strategy could be a general method used in TAVR with a self-expanding valve for patients with PNAR, which had a higher device success rate and lower rate of complications than the conventional method.</p>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our initial study suggested that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve for pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR) had a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when the noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) was achieved.

Objectives: This study enrolled patients with PNAR who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves between January 2019 and April 2024, compared the NCPI strategy with the conventional approach, and analyzed factors associated with successful NCPI.

Methods: We divided 87 patients into an early (conventional) group of patients treated before February 2023 and a late (NCPI strategy) group of patients treated after February 2023. Then the patients were also categorized by successful NCPI and non-NCPI group.

Results: The late group had significantly higher device success rates than the early group (92.9% vs 73.3%; P = 0.016) and lower rates of MACE (19.5% vs 51.1%; P = 0.002) and valve-in-valve implantation (4.8% vs 24.4%; P = 0.01). Importantly, NCPI was achieved in 90.5% of patients in the late group compared with only 17.8% in the early group (P < 0.001). The NCPI group had a higher device success rate (93.5% vs 70.7%; P = 0.005) and lower MACE rate (17.4%vs 56.1%; P < 0.001) than the non-NCPI group. NCPI (OR: 6.71; P = 0.032) and aortic angulation (OR: 1.07; P = 0.035) were independent predictors of device success.

Conclusions: NCPI strategy could be a general method used in TAVR with a self-expanding valve for patients with PNAR, which had a higher device success rate and lower rate of complications than the conventional method.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉返流的非冠状动脉窦枢轴植入术。
背景:我们的初步研究表明,接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和自扩张瓣膜治疗纯原生主动脉瓣返流(PNAR)的患者在实现非冠状动脉窦枢轴植入(NCPI)后,发生主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的几率较低。目的:本研究纳入2019年1月至2024年4月期间接受自扩瓣膜TAVR的PNAR患者,比较NCPI策略与传统方法,并分析NCPI成功的相关因素。方法:将87例患者分为2023年2月前治疗的早期(常规)组和2023年2月后治疗的晚期(NCPI策略)组。然后将患者分为NCPI成功组和非NCPI组。结果:晚期组器械成功率明显高于早期组(92.9% vs 73.3%;P = 0.016), MACE发生率较低(19.5% vs 51.1%;P = 0.002)和瓣中植入(4.8% vs 24.4%;P = 0.01)。重要的是,晚期组90.5%的患者达到了NCPI,而早期组只有17.8% (P < 0.001)。NCPI组器械成功率更高(93.5% vs 70.7%;P = 0.005)和较低的MACE率(17.4%vs 56.1%;P < 0.001)高于非ncpi组。Ncpi (or: 6.71;P = 0.032)和主动脉成角(OR: 1.07;P = 0.035)是器械成功的独立预测因子。结论:NCPI策略可作为PNAR患者自扩瓣膜TAVR的通用方法,其装置成功率高于常规方法,并发症发生率低于常规方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信