Lifan Yang MD , Zilong Weng MB , Shasha Chen MD , Yuan Zhang MD , Daxin Zhou MD , Wenzhi Pan MD , Junbo Ge MD
{"title":"Noncoronary Sinus Pivot Implantation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valve for Aortic Regurgitation","authors":"Lifan Yang MD , Zilong Weng MB , Shasha Chen MD , Yuan Zhang MD , Daxin Zhou MD , Wenzhi Pan MD , Junbo Ge MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Our initial study suggested that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve for pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR) had a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when the noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) was achieved.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study enrolled patients with PNAR who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves between January 2019 and April 2024, compared the NCPI strategy with the conventional approach, and analyzed factors associated with successful NCPI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We divided 87 patients into an early (conventional) group of patients treated before February 2023 and a late (NCPI strategy) group of patients treated after February 2023. Then the patients were also categorized by successful NCPI and non-NCPI group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The late group had significantly higher device success rates than the early group (92.9% vs 73.3%; <em>P =</em> 0.016) and lower rates of MACE (19.5% vs 51.1%; <em>P =</em> 0.002) and valve-in-valve implantation (4.8% vs 24.4%; <em>P =</em> 0.01). Importantly, NCPI was achieved in 90.5% of patients in the late group compared with only 17.8% in the early group (<em>P <</em> 0.001). The NCPI group had a higher device success rate (93.5% vs 70.7%; <em>P =</em> 0.005) and lower MACE rate (17.4%vs 56.1%; <em>P</em> < 0.001) than the non-NCPI group. NCPI (OR: 6.71; <em>P =</em> 0.032) and aortic angulation (OR: 1.07; <em>P =</em> 0.035) were independent predictors of device success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NCPI strategy could be a general method used in TAVR with a self-expanding valve for patients with PNAR, which had a higher device success rate and lower rate of complications than the conventional method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":"5 7","pages":"Pages 884-894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374725002327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Our initial study suggested that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve for pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR) had a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when the noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) was achieved.
Objectives
This study enrolled patients with PNAR who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves between January 2019 and April 2024, compared the NCPI strategy with the conventional approach, and analyzed factors associated with successful NCPI.
Methods
We divided 87 patients into an early (conventional) group of patients treated before February 2023 and a late (NCPI strategy) group of patients treated after February 2023. Then the patients were also categorized by successful NCPI and non-NCPI group.
Results
The late group had significantly higher device success rates than the early group (92.9% vs 73.3%; P = 0.016) and lower rates of MACE (19.5% vs 51.1%; P = 0.002) and valve-in-valve implantation (4.8% vs 24.4%; P = 0.01). Importantly, NCPI was achieved in 90.5% of patients in the late group compared with only 17.8% in the early group (P < 0.001). The NCPI group had a higher device success rate (93.5% vs 70.7%; P = 0.005) and lower MACE rate (17.4%vs 56.1%; P < 0.001) than the non-NCPI group. NCPI (OR: 6.71; P = 0.032) and aortic angulation (OR: 1.07; P = 0.035) were independent predictors of device success.
Conclusions
NCPI strategy could be a general method used in TAVR with a self-expanding valve for patients with PNAR, which had a higher device success rate and lower rate of complications than the conventional method.