Relief craving severity moderates nonpharmacological treatment outcomes in treatment-seeking older adults with alcohol use disorder.

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Peter Næsborg Schøler, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Katie Witkiewitz, Michael Bogenschutz, Randi Bilberg, Angelina Isabella Mellentin, Kjeld Andersen
{"title":"Relief craving severity moderates nonpharmacological treatment outcomes in treatment-seeking older adults with alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Peter Næsborg Schøler, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Katie Witkiewitz, Michael Bogenschutz, Randi Bilberg, Angelina Isabella Mellentin, Kjeld Andersen","doi":"10.1111/acer.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Craving alcohol for reward (positive reinforcement) and relief (negative reinforcement) has been proposed as useful phenotypes for precision medicine approaches to alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment. This study examined reward and relief craving in nonpharmacological treatments, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) versus MET + Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA), among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analyses of data from The Elderly Study (N = 693; mean age 64.0 years; male 59.7%), a single-blinded, multisite, randomized controlled trial of two nonpharmacological treatments in an elderly population (60+ years) diagnosed with DSM-5 AUD. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify craving profiles based on The Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale (AASE) temptation subscale scores. The classification performance of clinical cutoff scores on the AASE scale was tested against the LPA solution. Associations between cutoff-based craving groups and treatment success (binary variable representing change in alcohol consumption and quality of life across profiles pre-/posttreatment) were analyzed using logistic regression, stratified on MET versus MET + CRA. Differences in alcohol consumption and quality of life scores pre-/posttreatment were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four reward-relief craving profiles were identified but were more distinguished by variation in relief craving (low relief, medium-low relief, medium-high relief, and high relief). Compared to the low relief craving group, the medium-high relief craving group had lower odds for treatment success when receiving MET: adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.21-0.84), and the high relief craving group had lower odds for treatment success when receiving MET + CRA: aOR 0.38 (95% CI 0.15-0.94). Alcohol consumption was reduced, and psychological quality of life was improved at follow-up across all relief craving groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified reward and relief drinking craving among older adults with AUD. Results indicate that considering relief craving when offering nonpharmacological treatment to older adults suffering from AUD may be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Craving alcohol for reward (positive reinforcement) and relief (negative reinforcement) has been proposed as useful phenotypes for precision medicine approaches to alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment. This study examined reward and relief craving in nonpharmacological treatments, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) versus MET + Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA), among older adults.

Methods: Secondary analyses of data from The Elderly Study (N = 693; mean age 64.0 years; male 59.7%), a single-blinded, multisite, randomized controlled trial of two nonpharmacological treatments in an elderly population (60+ years) diagnosed with DSM-5 AUD. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify craving profiles based on The Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale (AASE) temptation subscale scores. The classification performance of clinical cutoff scores on the AASE scale was tested against the LPA solution. Associations between cutoff-based craving groups and treatment success (binary variable representing change in alcohol consumption and quality of life across profiles pre-/posttreatment) were analyzed using logistic regression, stratified on MET versus MET + CRA. Differences in alcohol consumption and quality of life scores pre-/posttreatment were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: Four reward-relief craving profiles were identified but were more distinguished by variation in relief craving (low relief, medium-low relief, medium-high relief, and high relief). Compared to the low relief craving group, the medium-high relief craving group had lower odds for treatment success when receiving MET: adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.21-0.84), and the high relief craving group had lower odds for treatment success when receiving MET + CRA: aOR 0.38 (95% CI 0.15-0.94). Alcohol consumption was reduced, and psychological quality of life was improved at follow-up across all relief craving groups.

Conclusion: This study identified reward and relief drinking craving among older adults with AUD. Results indicate that considering relief craving when offering nonpharmacological treatment to older adults suffering from AUD may be clinically relevant.

缓解渴望严重程度调节寻求治疗的老年人酒精使用障碍的非药物治疗结果。
背景:渴望酒精获得奖励(正强化)和缓解(负强化)已被提出作为精确医学方法治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的有用表型。本研究考察了老年人在非药物治疗中的奖励和缓解渴望,动机增强疗法(MET)与动机增强疗法+社区强化方法(CRA)。方法:对老年研究(N = 693;平均年龄64.0岁;男性59.7%),这是一项单盲、多地点、随机对照试验,在诊断为DSM-5 AUD的老年人群(60岁以上)中进行两种非药物治疗。基于戒酒自我效能量表(AASE)诱惑分量表得分,采用潜在特征分析(LPA)识别渴望特征。用LPA溶液对AASE量表的临床截止评分进行分类性能测试。使用逻辑回归分析基于临界值的渴望组与治疗成功(代表治疗前/治疗后各个剖面中酒精消费量和生活质量变化的二元变量)之间的关联,并对MET与MET + CRA进行分层。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析治疗前后饮酒量和生活质量评分的差异。结果:确定了四种奖励-缓解渴望特征,但更明显的是缓解渴望的变化(低缓解、中低缓解、中高缓解和高缓解)。与低缓解渴望组相比,中高缓解渴望组在接受MET时治疗成功的几率较低:调整优势比(aOR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.21-0.84),高缓解渴望组在接受MET + CRA时治疗成功的几率较低:aOR 0.38 (95% CI 0.15-0.94)。在所有缓解渴望组的随访中,酒精消费量减少,心理生活质量得到改善。结论:本研究确定了老年AUD患者的奖励和缓解性饮酒渴望。结果表明,在为老年AUD患者提供非药物治疗时考虑缓解渴望可能具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信