Donor-specific antibodies against HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ and their implications in kidney transplantation.

Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil, Nihal Mohammed Sadagah, Ishida Hediki, Jackson Tan, Salem H Al-Qurashi
{"title":"Donor-specific antibodies against HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ and their implications in kidney transplantation.","authors":"Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil, Nihal Mohammed Sadagah, Ishida Hediki, Jackson Tan, Salem H Al-Qurashi","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.99952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ are thought to be benign due to low expression and few initial negative studies. Historically, most allocation programs used HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR antigens for matching. With the advent and use of single-bead antigen assays, more was learned about donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against these antigens. Interest in these antigens and antibodies grew when cases of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), mixed rejections, chronic AMR, and reduced graft survival were reported with DSAs against these antigens. Although the deleterious effects of these DSAs are more pronounced in retransplants, harmful effects have also been observed in first-time recipients. DSAs against each of these antigens can trigger rejection alone. Their combination with DSAs against HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR can cause more damage. It has been shown that strategies that reduce mismatches for these antigen lead to fewer rejections and better graft survival. There is a need for greater consensus on the universal typing of these antigens prior to transplantation for better patient and graft outcomes. This review focuses on the interaction of these antigens with lymphocytes and killer immunoglobulin receptors, arguments for not typing them, detailed analyses of the literature about their harmful effects, potential strategies moving forward, and recommendations for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":65557,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志","volume":"15 2","pages":"99952"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.99952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ are thought to be benign due to low expression and few initial negative studies. Historically, most allocation programs used HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR antigens for matching. With the advent and use of single-bead antigen assays, more was learned about donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against these antigens. Interest in these antigens and antibodies grew when cases of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), mixed rejections, chronic AMR, and reduced graft survival were reported with DSAs against these antigens. Although the deleterious effects of these DSAs are more pronounced in retransplants, harmful effects have also been observed in first-time recipients. DSAs against each of these antigens can trigger rejection alone. Their combination with DSAs against HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR can cause more damage. It has been shown that strategies that reduce mismatches for these antigen lead to fewer rejections and better graft survival. There is a need for greater consensus on the universal typing of these antigens prior to transplantation for better patient and graft outcomes. This review focuses on the interaction of these antigens with lymphocytes and killer immunoglobulin receptors, arguments for not typing them, detailed analyses of the literature about their harmful effects, potential strategies moving forward, and recommendations for the future.

针对HLA-C、HLA-DP和HLA-DQ的供体特异性抗体及其在肾移植中的意义。
由于HLA-C、HLA-DP和HLA-DQ的低表达和初步阴性研究很少,因此被认为是良性的。历史上,大多数分配程序使用HLA-A, HLA-B和HLA-DR抗原进行匹配。随着单抗原检测的出现和使用,人们对针对这些抗原的供体特异性抗体(dsa)有了更多的了解。当针对这些抗原的dsa出现急性抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)、混合排斥反应、慢性AMR和移植物存活率降低的病例时,人们对这些抗原和抗体的兴趣越来越大。虽然这些dsa的有害影响在再移植中更为明显,但在首次受者中也观察到有害影响。针对每种抗原的dsa都能单独引发排斥反应。它们与抗HLA-A、HLA-B和HLA-DR的dsa联合可造成更大的损害。研究表明,减少这些抗原错配的策略可以减少排斥反应,提高移植物存活率。为了更好的患者和移植结果,需要在移植前对这些抗原的通用分型达成更大的共识。这篇综述的重点是这些抗原与淋巴细胞和杀伤免疫球蛋白受体的相互作用,不分型它们的理由,详细的文献分析它们的有害影响,潜在的策略,以及对未来的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
293
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信