S A Guamán-Rivera, F M Carrillo Riofrío, M E Jativa-Brito, L E Chuqui-Puma, G M Soldado Soldado, L D Cabezas Andrade, H R Sanchez Quispe, A A Casierra Cardenas, J M Mira Naranjo, J P Santillán Aguirre, C D Congo-Yépez
{"title":"Carbon footprint assessment of livestock farms under tropical conditions: first approximation.","authors":"S A Guamán-Rivera, F M Carrillo Riofrío, M E Jativa-Brito, L E Chuqui-Puma, G M Soldado Soldado, L D Cabezas Andrade, H R Sanchez Quispe, A A Casierra Cardenas, J M Mira Naranjo, J P Santillán Aguirre, C D Congo-Yépez","doi":"10.1590/1519-6984.293349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the carbon footprint (CF) of livestock farms in the Orellana Province of the Ecuadorian Amazon, focusing on emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management, and energy use. Utilizing Tier I and Tier II methodologies outlined by the IPCC (2006), the research quantifies greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across three distinct typologies of Agricultural Productive Units (APUs): Conventional Systems (Type 1), Efficient Resource Use (Type 2), and Subsistence and Dependency Systems (Type 3). Results show that the average CF ranged from 14.5 to 18.3 kg CO2-eq per kg of live weight, with enteric fermentation accounting for 60.2% of emissions, followed by manure management (25.4%) and energy use (14.4%). Type 1 farms demonstrated the highest total CF (2.400 kg CO2-eq/farm), primarily due to larger herd sizes (9.8 TLU) and less efficient practices. Type 2 farms, characterized by rotational grazing and improved resource use, showed a reduced CF of 1.860 kg CO2-eq/farm. Type 3 farms, though smaller in scale, exhibited a CF of 1.810 kg CO2-eq/farm, with higher emissions intensity per animal (60.3 kg CO2-eq/animal) compared to Type 1 and 2 (53.2 kg CO2-eq/animal on average). Across all typologies, methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation remains the largest emission source. The findings underscore the critical need for sustainable interventions, such as silvopastoral systems, to mitigate GHG emissions while improving productivity. This research provides baseline data for designing region-specific mitigation strategies, contributing to global efforts to reduce the environmental impact of livestock farming.</p>","PeriodicalId":55326,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","volume":"85 ","pages":"e293349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.293349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the carbon footprint (CF) of livestock farms in the Orellana Province of the Ecuadorian Amazon, focusing on emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management, and energy use. Utilizing Tier I and Tier II methodologies outlined by the IPCC (2006), the research quantifies greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across three distinct typologies of Agricultural Productive Units (APUs): Conventional Systems (Type 1), Efficient Resource Use (Type 2), and Subsistence and Dependency Systems (Type 3). Results show that the average CF ranged from 14.5 to 18.3 kg CO2-eq per kg of live weight, with enteric fermentation accounting for 60.2% of emissions, followed by manure management (25.4%) and energy use (14.4%). Type 1 farms demonstrated the highest total CF (2.400 kg CO2-eq/farm), primarily due to larger herd sizes (9.8 TLU) and less efficient practices. Type 2 farms, characterized by rotational grazing and improved resource use, showed a reduced CF of 1.860 kg CO2-eq/farm. Type 3 farms, though smaller in scale, exhibited a CF of 1.810 kg CO2-eq/farm, with higher emissions intensity per animal (60.3 kg CO2-eq/animal) compared to Type 1 and 2 (53.2 kg CO2-eq/animal on average). Across all typologies, methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation remains the largest emission source. The findings underscore the critical need for sustainable interventions, such as silvopastoral systems, to mitigate GHG emissions while improving productivity. This research provides baseline data for designing region-specific mitigation strategies, contributing to global efforts to reduce the environmental impact of livestock farming.
本研究评估了厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区Orellana省牲畜养殖场的碳足迹(CF),重点关注肠道发酵、粪便管理和能源使用产生的排放。利用IPCC(2006)概述的第一级和第二级方法,该研究量化了三种不同类型农业生产单位(apu)的温室气体排放:传统系统(第一类)、有效资源利用(第二类)和生存和依赖系统(第三类)。结果表明:每kg活重平均CF值为14.5 ~ 18.3 kg co2当量,其中肠道发酵排放占60.2%,粪便管理排放占25.4%,能源利用排放占14.4%。1型养殖场的总CF最高(2.400 kg co2当量/场),主要是由于较大的畜群规模(9.8 TLU)和较低的养殖效率。以轮牧和改善资源利用为特征的2型养殖场,CF降低了1.860 kg co2当量/场。3型养殖场虽然规模较小,但CF值为1.810 kg co2当量/头,每头动物的排放强度(60.3 kg co2当量/头)高于1型和2型养殖场(平均53.2 kg co2当量/头)。在所有类型中,肠道发酵产生的甲烷(CH4)仍然是最大的排放源。研究结果强调,迫切需要可持续的干预措施,如造林系统,以减少温室气体排放,同时提高生产力。这项研究为设计特定区域的缓解战略提供了基线数据,有助于减少畜牧业对环境的影响的全球努力。
期刊介绍:
The BJB – Brazilian Journal of Biology® is a scientific journal devoted to publishing original articles in all fields of the Biological Sciences, i.e., General Biology, Cell Biology, Evolution, Biological Oceanography, Taxonomy, Geographic Distribution, Limnology, Aquatic Biology, Botany, Zoology, Genetics, and Ecology. Priority is given to papers presenting results of researches in the Neotropical region. Material published includes research papers, review papers (upon approval of the Editorial Board), notes, book reviews, and comments.