Effects of Hearing Loss on Semantic Prediction: Delayed Prediction for Intelligible Speech When Listening Is Demanding.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Leigh B Fernandez, Muzna Shehzad, Lauren V Hadley
{"title":"Effects of Hearing Loss on Semantic Prediction: Delayed Prediction for Intelligible Speech When Listening Is Demanding.","authors":"Leigh B Fernandez, Muzna Shehzad, Lauren V Hadley","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Linguistic context can be used during speech listening to predict what a talker will say next. These predictions may be particularly useful in adverse listening conditions, since they can facilitate speech processing. In this study, we investigated the impact of postlingual hearing loss on prediction processes. Because hearing loss leads to a perceptual deficit (i.e., degraded auditory input), that can also have cognitive impacts (i.e., increased competition for cognitive resources due to increased listening effort), it is a naturalistic test case of how different sorts of challenge affect prediction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We report a visual world eye-tracking study run with 3 participant groups: older adults (range: 53 to 80 years old) with normal hearing (n = 30), older adults with hearing loss listening under low demand (n = 32), and older adults with hearing loss listening under high demand (n = 31). Using highly semantically constraining predictable sentences, we analyzed the timecourse of simple associative predictions based on the agent of the sentence (sub-experiment 1), and the timecourse by which these predictions were narrowed with additional constraint provided by the verb (sub-experiment 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was no effect of group on early agent-based predictions, we saw that the buildup and tailoring of verb-based prediction was delayed with hearing loss and exacerbated by listening demand. As there was no comparable group difference for semantically unconstraining neutral sentences, this cannot be explained as a result of delayed lexical access in the hearing loss groups. We also assessed the cost of incorrect predictions but did not see any group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate two separable stages of prediction that are differently affected by hearing loss and listening demand (potentially due to changes in listening effort), and reveal delayed prediction as a cognitive impact of hearing loss that could compound simple audibility effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Linguistic context can be used during speech listening to predict what a talker will say next. These predictions may be particularly useful in adverse listening conditions, since they can facilitate speech processing. In this study, we investigated the impact of postlingual hearing loss on prediction processes. Because hearing loss leads to a perceptual deficit (i.e., degraded auditory input), that can also have cognitive impacts (i.e., increased competition for cognitive resources due to increased listening effort), it is a naturalistic test case of how different sorts of challenge affect prediction.

Design: We report a visual world eye-tracking study run with 3 participant groups: older adults (range: 53 to 80 years old) with normal hearing (n = 30), older adults with hearing loss listening under low demand (n = 32), and older adults with hearing loss listening under high demand (n = 31). Using highly semantically constraining predictable sentences, we analyzed the timecourse of simple associative predictions based on the agent of the sentence (sub-experiment 1), and the timecourse by which these predictions were narrowed with additional constraint provided by the verb (sub-experiment 2).

Results: Although there was no effect of group on early agent-based predictions, we saw that the buildup and tailoring of verb-based prediction was delayed with hearing loss and exacerbated by listening demand. As there was no comparable group difference for semantically unconstraining neutral sentences, this cannot be explained as a result of delayed lexical access in the hearing loss groups. We also assessed the cost of incorrect predictions but did not see any group differences.

Conclusion: These findings indicate two separable stages of prediction that are differently affected by hearing loss and listening demand (potentially due to changes in listening effort), and reveal delayed prediction as a cognitive impact of hearing loss that could compound simple audibility effects.

听力损失对语义预测的影响:听力要求时可理解言语的延迟预测。
目的:在听讲过程中,语言语境可以用来预测说话者接下来要说什么。这些预测在不利的听力条件下可能特别有用,因为它们可以促进语音处理。在这项研究中,我们调查了语后听力损失对预测过程的影响。因为听力损失会导致感知缺陷(即听觉输入退化),这也会对认知产生影响(即,由于听力努力的增加,对认知资源的竞争加剧),这是一个不同类型的挑战如何影响预测的自然测试案例。设计:我们报告了一项视觉世界眼动追踪研究,共有3组参与者:听力正常的老年人(53 - 80岁)(n = 30),低需求听力损失的老年人(n = 32),高需求听力损失的老年人(n = 31)。使用高度语义约束的可预测句子,我们分析了基于句子主体的简单联想预测的时间历程(子实验1),以及动词提供的额外约束缩小这些预测的时间历程(子实验2)。结果:虽然小组对早期基于主体的预测没有影响,但我们看到基于动词的预测的建立和剪裁随着听力损失而延迟,并因听力需求而加剧。由于在语义不受约束的中性句上没有可比较的组间差异,这不能解释为听力损失组词汇获取延迟的结果。我们还评估了错误预测的成本,但没有发现任何组间差异。结论:这些研究结果表明,听力损失和听力需求(可能是由于听力努力的变化)对预测的影响有两个可分离的阶段,并揭示了听力损失的认知影响可能会加剧简单的可听性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信