Regional Clinical Alliance Path for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome - Impact on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-25 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0059
Tomomi Watanabe, Satoshi Kobara, Ryosuke Amisaki, Hisashi Noma, Masaharu Fukuki, Akira Ohtahara, Kensaku Yamada, Masashi Fujise, Yoshihito Nozaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Hiroki Omodani, Kazuhiro Yamamoto
{"title":"Regional Clinical Alliance Path for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome - Impact on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels.","authors":"Tomomi Watanabe, Satoshi Kobara, Ryosuke Amisaki, Hisashi Noma, Masaharu Fukuki, Akira Ohtahara, Kensaku Yamada, Masashi Fujise, Yoshihito Nozaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Hiroki Omodani, Kazuhiro Yamamoto","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis for survivors of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains substantially worse compared with the general population. In Japan, regional clinical alliance paths (RCAPs) have been promoted to support the secondary prevention of ACS within community settings. However, the implementation of RCAPs is currently low, and their clinical efficacy has not been established. This study evaluated the impact of RCAP implementation on secondary prevention outcomes in ACS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of 405 patients admitted to Tottori University Hospital for ACS between May 2020 and April 2023, 136 who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received follow-up care at primary care clinics were included in the study. Sixty-five (47.8%) patients received care under an RCAP, whereas 71 received standard care. RCAP implementation was associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 70 mg/dL and with greater reductions in LDL-C levels overall. Propensity score-weighted analysis confirmed that the RCAP group achieved significantly better LDL-C control after adjustment for baseline characteristics using inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCAP implementation improved the rate of LDL-C target achievement and the degree of LDL-C reduction in post-ACS patients receiving follow-up care from family physicians. RCAP implementation is an effective strategy for the secondary prevention of ACS, particularly by enhancing adherence to established pharmacological therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1197-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis for survivors of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains substantially worse compared with the general population. In Japan, regional clinical alliance paths (RCAPs) have been promoted to support the secondary prevention of ACS within community settings. However, the implementation of RCAPs is currently low, and their clinical efficacy has not been established. This study evaluated the impact of RCAP implementation on secondary prevention outcomes in ACS patients.

Methods and results: Of 405 patients admitted to Tottori University Hospital for ACS between May 2020 and April 2023, 136 who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received follow-up care at primary care clinics were included in the study. Sixty-five (47.8%) patients received care under an RCAP, whereas 71 received standard care. RCAP implementation was associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 70 mg/dL and with greater reductions in LDL-C levels overall. Propensity score-weighted analysis confirmed that the RCAP group achieved significantly better LDL-C control after adjustment for baseline characteristics using inverse probability weighting.

Conclusions: RCAP implementation improved the rate of LDL-C target achievement and the degree of LDL-C reduction in post-ACS patients receiving follow-up care from family physicians. RCAP implementation is an effective strategy for the secondary prevention of ACS, particularly by enhancing adherence to established pharmacological therapies.

急性冠脉综合征二级预防的区域临床联盟路径-对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响。
背景:与普通人群相比,急性冠脉综合征(ACS)幸存者的预后仍然明显较差。在日本,区域临床联盟路径(RCAPs)已得到推广,以支持社区环境中ACS的二级预防。然而,目前rcap的实施率较低,其临床疗效尚未确定。本研究评估了RCAP实施对ACS患者二级预防结局的影响。方法和结果:在2020年5月至2023年4月期间,鸟取大学医院收治的405例ACS患者中,136例接受了初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),并在初级保健诊所接受了随访治疗。65例(47.8%)患者接受了RCAP治疗,而71例患者接受了标准治疗。RCAP的实施与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平低于70 mg/dL的患者比例较高以及总体LDL-C水平下降幅度较大相关。倾向评分加权分析证实,RCAP组在使用逆概率加权调整基线特征后,LDL-C控制明显更好。结论:RCAP的实施提高了接受家庭医生随访的acs后患者LDL-C目标达成率和LDL-C降低程度。RCAP的实施是ACS二级预防的有效策略,特别是通过加强对既定药物治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信