The time-dependent efficacy of early surgical decompression in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xiaolong Li, Yuan Yuan, Yilin Chen, JinYe Lv, Yihao Lian, Heng Yin
{"title":"The time-dependent efficacy of early surgical decompression in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaolong Li, Yuan Yuan, Yilin Chen, JinYe Lv, Yihao Lian, Heng Yin","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2517925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous studies have demonstrated that early surgical intervention in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury leads to superior recovery of various indicators, including neurological function, compared to late surgical intervention. However, some relevant clinical randomized controlled trials have indicated that the motor function recovery of patients undergoing early surgical decompression does not show a significant advantage during initial follow-up periods. The benefits of early surgical decompression become more apparent as the follow-up duration extends. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prognosis of early versus late surgical intervention on traumatic spinal cord injury and to analyze whether the prognostic benefits of early surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury patients are time-dependent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed the timing of surgical intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury. The data extracted from all included studies were processed and analyzed utilizing the RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 702 patients were included in this analysis, with 345 patients in the early surgery group and 357 patients in the late surgery group. The results showed that the early surgery group had a significantly higher rate of improvement in AIS grade (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.05-2.15; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (MD = -4.76; 95% CI: -9.19 - -0.32; <i>p</i> = 0.04) compared to the late surgery group. Although there was no significant difference in total motor scores between the two groups in the early postoperative period, the pooled data still favored the early surgery group (MD = 4.43; 95% CI: 1.23-7.63; <i>p</i> = 0.007). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (RR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.30-1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early surgical decompression leads to better prognosis in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and shows a trend of more obvious advantages in motor function recovery with longer follow-up time than late surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2517925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Numerous studies have demonstrated that early surgical intervention in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury leads to superior recovery of various indicators, including neurological function, compared to late surgical intervention. However, some relevant clinical randomized controlled trials have indicated that the motor function recovery of patients undergoing early surgical decompression does not show a significant advantage during initial follow-up periods. The benefits of early surgical decompression become more apparent as the follow-up duration extends. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prognosis of early versus late surgical intervention on traumatic spinal cord injury and to analyze whether the prognostic benefits of early surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury patients are time-dependent.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed the timing of surgical intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury. The data extracted from all included studies were processed and analyzed utilizing the RevMan 5.4 software.

Results: Eight studies involving 702 patients were included in this analysis, with 345 patients in the early surgery group and 357 patients in the late surgery group. The results showed that the early surgery group had a significantly higher rate of improvement in AIS grade (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.05-2.15; p = 0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (MD = -4.76; 95% CI: -9.19 - -0.32; p = 0.04) compared to the late surgery group. Although there was no significant difference in total motor scores between the two groups in the early postoperative period, the pooled data still favored the early surgery group (MD = 4.43; 95% CI: 1.23-7.63; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (RR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.30-1.22; p = 0.16).

Conclusion: Early surgical decompression leads to better prognosis in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and shows a trend of more obvious advantages in motor function recovery with longer follow-up time than late surgical intervention.

外伤性脊髓损伤患者早期手术减压的时间依赖性疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:大量研究表明,创伤性脊髓损伤患者的早期手术干预与晚期手术干预相比,可使神经功能等各项指标恢复得更好。然而,一些相关的临床随机对照试验表明,早期手术减压患者的运动功能恢复在初始随访期并没有明显的优势。随着随访时间的延长,早期手术减压的益处变得更加明显。因此,本研究旨在评估外伤性脊髓损伤早期与晚期手术干预的预后,并分析外伤性脊髓损伤患者早期手术减压的预后获益是否具有时间依赖性。方法:我们通过检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,对创伤性脊髓损伤手术干预时机的随机对照试验和准随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。采用RevMan 5.4软件对所有纳入研究的数据进行处理和分析。结果:纳入8项研究702例患者,其中早期手术组345例,晚期手术组357例。结果显示,早期手术组AIS评分改善率显著高于早期手术组(OR = 1.50;95% ci: 1.05-2.15;p = 0.03),住院时间较短(MD = -4.76;95% ci: -9.19 - -0.32;P = 0.04)。尽管两组术后早期的总运动评分无显著差异,但合并数据仍有利于早期手术组(MD = 4.43;95% ci: 1.23-7.63;p = 0.007)。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(RR = 0.61;95% ci: 0.30-1.22;p = 0.16)。结论:早期手术减压对外伤性脊髓损伤患者预后较好,且随访时间较晚,在运动功能恢复方面优势更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信