How rethinking difficulties can shape important life outcomes.

IF 16.7 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Veronika Job, Christopher Mlynski, Christina A Bauer
{"title":"How rethinking difficulties can shape important life outcomes.","authors":"Veronika Job, Christopher Mlynski, Christina A Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficulties are a common part of life, ranging from daily challenges to chronic adversity. While difficulties can undermine well-being, they can also promote growth and resilience. What determines whether difficulty harms or helps? A growing body of research points to the role of difficulty beliefs, that is, general beliefs about whether dealing with difficulty is harmful or beneficial. Prior work has examined these beliefs across domains such as task-level demand, life situation-level stress, and identity-level challenges, but these literatures remain disconnected. In this review, we synthesize these research streams, highlighting their shared principles. We propose a unifying mechanistic model and show how an integrative perspective can clarify how difficulty beliefs shape motivation, coping, and long-term outcomes across contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49417,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Difficulties are a common part of life, ranging from daily challenges to chronic adversity. While difficulties can undermine well-being, they can also promote growth and resilience. What determines whether difficulty harms or helps? A growing body of research points to the role of difficulty beliefs, that is, general beliefs about whether dealing with difficulty is harmful or beneficial. Prior work has examined these beliefs across domains such as task-level demand, life situation-level stress, and identity-level challenges, but these literatures remain disconnected. In this review, we synthesize these research streams, highlighting their shared principles. We propose a unifying mechanistic model and show how an integrative perspective can clarify how difficulty beliefs shape motivation, coping, and long-term outcomes across contexts.

重新思考困难如何影响重要的生活结果。
困难是生活中常见的一部分,从日常的挑战到长期的逆境。虽然困难会破坏幸福感,但它们也能促进增长和复原力。是什么决定了困难是有害还是有益?越来越多的研究指出了困难信念的作用,即关于处理困难是有害还是有益的一般信念。先前的工作已经从任务层面的需求、生活情境层面的压力和身份层面的挑战等领域考察了这些信念,但这些文献仍然是脱节的。在这篇综述中,我们综合了这些研究流派,突出了它们的共同原则。我们提出了一个统一的机制模型,并展示了综合视角如何阐明困难信念如何在不同背景下塑造动机、应对和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
27.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Essential reading for those working directly in the cognitive sciences or in related specialist areas, Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides an instant overview of current thinking for scientists, students and teachers who want to keep up with the latest developments in the cognitive sciences. The journal brings together research in psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, philosophy, computer science and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides a platform for the interaction of these disciplines and the evolution of cognitive science as an independent field of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信