Beneficial outcomes of medication review in patients with hip fractures: a systematic review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Dina Aprillia Ariestine, Taro Kojima, Fakhriza Hidayati Siregar, Alvin Ivander
{"title":"Beneficial outcomes of medication review in patients with hip fractures: a systematic review.","authors":"Dina Aprillia Ariestine, Taro Kojima, Fakhriza Hidayati Siregar, Alvin Ivander","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01252-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to analyze medication review efficacy toward clinical outcomes in older adults with hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using the modified keywords \"medication review,\" \"polypharmacy,\" and \"hip fractures\" to find relevant studies. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed published studies from 2014 to 2024. A total of 21 studies have been identified, six of which reported medication reviews for older adults with hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings highlight the critical need for a multi-faceted strategy to address the challenges of polypharmacy in older adults with hip fractures. A higher number of medications is associated with some adverse outcomes, such as increased hospitalization rates, longer recovery times, and a greater incidence of pressure ulcers. Although minimizing inappropriate medications may show some positive results, focusing solely on medication management is insufficient in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication reviews have substantially mitigated medication-related issues, including costs, drug efficacy, and patient discomfort. Nevertheless, clinical outcomes have yet to exhibit significant improvement, which presents an opportunity for further research to explore the potential benefits of medication reviews in enhancing the care of patients with hip fractures. A holistic approach, which consists of medication review, patient education, and tailored rehabilitation programs, may be essential to improve recovery, decrease hospitalization rates, and prevent adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01252-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze medication review efficacy toward clinical outcomes in older adults with hip fractures.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the modified keywords "medication review," "polypharmacy," and "hip fractures" to find relevant studies. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed published studies from 2014 to 2024. A total of 21 studies have been identified, six of which reported medication reviews for older adults with hip fractures.

Results: The findings highlight the critical need for a multi-faceted strategy to address the challenges of polypharmacy in older adults with hip fractures. A higher number of medications is associated with some adverse outcomes, such as increased hospitalization rates, longer recovery times, and a greater incidence of pressure ulcers. Although minimizing inappropriate medications may show some positive results, focusing solely on medication management is insufficient in this vulnerable population.

Conclusion: Medication reviews have substantially mitigated medication-related issues, including costs, drug efficacy, and patient discomfort. Nevertheless, clinical outcomes have yet to exhibit significant improvement, which presents an opportunity for further research to explore the potential benefits of medication reviews in enhancing the care of patients with hip fractures. A holistic approach, which consists of medication review, patient education, and tailored rehabilitation programs, may be essential to improve recovery, decrease hospitalization rates, and prevent adverse events.

髋部骨折患者用药回顾的有益结果:一项系统回顾。
目的:本研究旨在分析药物回顾对老年髋部骨折临床结果的影响。方法:以“药物综述”、“综合用药”、“髋部骨折”等修改后的关键词进行系统检索,查找相关研究。根据PRISMA指南,我们回顾了2014年至2024年发表的研究。共有21项研究被确定,其中6项报告了老年人髋部骨折的药物评价。结果:研究结果强调,迫切需要一个多方面的策略来解决老年髋部骨折患者多重用药的挑战。较多的药物用量与一些不良后果有关,如住院率增加、恢复时间延长和压疮发生率增加。虽然尽量减少不适当的药物可能会显示出一些积极的结果,但仅仅关注药物管理在这一弱势群体中是不够的。结论:药物审查大大减轻了药物相关问题,包括费用、药物疗效和患者不适。然而,临床结果尚未显示出显著的改善,这为进一步研究探索药物回顾在加强髋部骨折患者护理方面的潜在益处提供了机会。一个整体的方法,包括药物审查,患者教育,量身定制的康复计划,可能是必不可少的,以提高恢复,降低住院率,并防止不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信