A retrospective comparison between DaVinci XI and DaVinci SP robotic-assisted cholecystectomies.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jenny Tran, Matthew Schultzel, Daniel Burgess, Ingle Rommanee
{"title":"A retrospective comparison between DaVinci XI and DaVinci SP robotic-assisted cholecystectomies.","authors":"Jenny Tran, Matthew Schultzel, Daniel Burgess, Ingle Rommanee","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02478-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determine procedure and patient outcome differences between multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomies and single port robotic assisted cholecystectomies. We are retrospectively comparing clinical data from patients that have received cholecystectomy procedure using DaVinci XI (MPC) and SP (SPC) by two surgeons between December 2021 and April 2023. There was a total of 119 patients; 99 patients underwent robotic-assisted multiport cholecystectomy using DaVinci XI (MPC) and 20 patients underwent robotic-assisted single port cholecystectomy using DaVinci SP (SPC). Patient data including demographics, robotic operation time and postoperative complications were collected retrospectively and analyzed using unpaired t-test with p-value < 0.05. The comparison will focus on patient demographics, robotic procedure time, post-operative complications between the two patient groups, multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and single port robotic-assisted cholecystectomy. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in all 119 patient procedures. There was no significant difference between active procedure time between multiport DaVinci XI and single port DaVinci SP (14.78 ± 9.7, 11.75 ± 3.16 (p = 0.386). The non significance decreases in active procedure time and no intraoperative, postoperative complications suggest single port cholecystectomy can be considered as a safe option for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and should be considered as an alternative for patients especially for cosmetic appeal. This study was reviewed and granted exemption under TUC IRB Review Board (# M-1324).</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02478-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determine procedure and patient outcome differences between multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomies and single port robotic assisted cholecystectomies. We are retrospectively comparing clinical data from patients that have received cholecystectomy procedure using DaVinci XI (MPC) and SP (SPC) by two surgeons between December 2021 and April 2023. There was a total of 119 patients; 99 patients underwent robotic-assisted multiport cholecystectomy using DaVinci XI (MPC) and 20 patients underwent robotic-assisted single port cholecystectomy using DaVinci SP (SPC). Patient data including demographics, robotic operation time and postoperative complications were collected retrospectively and analyzed using unpaired t-test with p-value < 0.05. The comparison will focus on patient demographics, robotic procedure time, post-operative complications between the two patient groups, multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and single port robotic-assisted cholecystectomy. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in all 119 patient procedures. There was no significant difference between active procedure time between multiport DaVinci XI and single port DaVinci SP (14.78 ± 9.7, 11.75 ± 3.16 (p = 0.386). The non significance decreases in active procedure time and no intraoperative, postoperative complications suggest single port cholecystectomy can be considered as a safe option for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and should be considered as an alternative for patients especially for cosmetic appeal. This study was reviewed and granted exemption under TUC IRB Review Board (# M-1324).

达芬奇XI和达芬奇SP机器人辅助胆囊切除术的回顾性比较。
确定多端口机器人辅助胆囊切除术和单端口机器人辅助胆囊切除术的手术和患者预后差异。我们回顾性比较了两位外科医生在2021年12月至2023年4月期间使用达芬奇XI (MPC)和SP (SPC)接受胆囊切除术的患者的临床数据。共119例患者;99例患者行达芬奇XI (MPC)机器人辅助多孔胆囊切除术,20例患者行达芬奇SP (SPC)机器人辅助单孔胆囊切除术。回顾性收集患者资料,包括人口统计学、机器人手术时间、术后并发症等,采用p值非配对t检验进行分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信