{"title":"Risk Management of Valproate and Other Teratogenic Anticonvulsants in the Era of Proliferating Use.","authors":"Almut G Winterstein","doi":"10.5863/JPPT-25-01204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Valproic acid, carbamazepine and topiramate have well-known teratogenic risk and all 3 rank among the top 10 teratogenic medications with the highest prenatal exposure risk. Importantly, pregnancies exposed to valproic acid are not dominated by patients with epilepsy but rather with less serious conditions such as migraine. In the United States, only a weight loss combination product containing topiramate has a mandatory pregnancy prevention program, a so-called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), while prevention of fetal exposure to all three single ingredient products relies on information in the product labeling and a medication guide provided at dispensing. REMS have been avoided for antinconvulsants because of concerns about reduced medication access for patients with serious conditions such as epilepsy, hence weighting maternal harm due to uncontrolled disease against adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes. However, the broad and growing spectrum of indications for all three medications, paired with increasingly strict abortion laws that may not allow pregnancy termination if accidental fetal exposure occurs, may require re-assessment of the benefit-risk of REMS. Here we argue that formal quantitative approaches are needed that allow assessments of maternal and infant risk, considering maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and teratogenic effects on infants, and the overall public health impact of REMS for anticonvulsants. For valproic acid, given its broad use, high risk of fetal exposure, and profound impact on child health, we predict the public health impact of a REMS will be favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"30 3","pages":"398-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/JPPT-25-01204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Valproic acid, carbamazepine and topiramate have well-known teratogenic risk and all 3 rank among the top 10 teratogenic medications with the highest prenatal exposure risk. Importantly, pregnancies exposed to valproic acid are not dominated by patients with epilepsy but rather with less serious conditions such as migraine. In the United States, only a weight loss combination product containing topiramate has a mandatory pregnancy prevention program, a so-called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), while prevention of fetal exposure to all three single ingredient products relies on information in the product labeling and a medication guide provided at dispensing. REMS have been avoided for antinconvulsants because of concerns about reduced medication access for patients with serious conditions such as epilepsy, hence weighting maternal harm due to uncontrolled disease against adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes. However, the broad and growing spectrum of indications for all three medications, paired with increasingly strict abortion laws that may not allow pregnancy termination if accidental fetal exposure occurs, may require re-assessment of the benefit-risk of REMS. Here we argue that formal quantitative approaches are needed that allow assessments of maternal and infant risk, considering maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and teratogenic effects on infants, and the overall public health impact of REMS for anticonvulsants. For valproic acid, given its broad use, high risk of fetal exposure, and profound impact on child health, we predict the public health impact of a REMS will be favorable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.