Risk Management of Valproate and Other Teratogenic Anticonvulsants in the Era of Proliferating Use.

Q2 Medicine
Almut G Winterstein
{"title":"Risk Management of Valproate and Other Teratogenic Anticonvulsants in the Era of Proliferating Use.","authors":"Almut G Winterstein","doi":"10.5863/JPPT-25-01204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Valproic acid, carbamazepine and topiramate have well-known teratogenic risk and all 3 rank among the top 10 teratogenic medications with the highest prenatal exposure risk. Importantly, pregnancies exposed to valproic acid are not dominated by patients with epilepsy but rather with less serious conditions such as migraine. In the United States, only a weight loss combination product containing topiramate has a mandatory pregnancy prevention program, a so-called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), while prevention of fetal exposure to all three single ingredient products relies on information in the product labeling and a medication guide provided at dispensing. REMS have been avoided for antinconvulsants because of concerns about reduced medication access for patients with serious conditions such as epilepsy, hence weighting maternal harm due to uncontrolled disease against adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes. However, the broad and growing spectrum of indications for all three medications, paired with increasingly strict abortion laws that may not allow pregnancy termination if accidental fetal exposure occurs, may require re-assessment of the benefit-risk of REMS. Here we argue that formal quantitative approaches are needed that allow assessments of maternal and infant risk, considering maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and teratogenic effects on infants, and the overall public health impact of REMS for anticonvulsants. For valproic acid, given its broad use, high risk of fetal exposure, and profound impact on child health, we predict the public health impact of a REMS will be favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"30 3","pages":"398-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/JPPT-25-01204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valproic acid, carbamazepine and topiramate have well-known teratogenic risk and all 3 rank among the top 10 teratogenic medications with the highest prenatal exposure risk. Importantly, pregnancies exposed to valproic acid are not dominated by patients with epilepsy but rather with less serious conditions such as migraine. In the United States, only a weight loss combination product containing topiramate has a mandatory pregnancy prevention program, a so-called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), while prevention of fetal exposure to all three single ingredient products relies on information in the product labeling and a medication guide provided at dispensing. REMS have been avoided for antinconvulsants because of concerns about reduced medication access for patients with serious conditions such as epilepsy, hence weighting maternal harm due to uncontrolled disease against adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes. However, the broad and growing spectrum of indications for all three medications, paired with increasingly strict abortion laws that may not allow pregnancy termination if accidental fetal exposure occurs, may require re-assessment of the benefit-risk of REMS. Here we argue that formal quantitative approaches are needed that allow assessments of maternal and infant risk, considering maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and teratogenic effects on infants, and the overall public health impact of REMS for anticonvulsants. For valproic acid, given its broad use, high risk of fetal exposure, and profound impact on child health, we predict the public health impact of a REMS will be favorable.

增殖使用时代丙戊酸钠和其他致畸抗惊厥药的风险管理。
丙戊酸、卡马西平和托吡酯具有众所周知的致畸风险,这三种药物均在产前暴露风险最高的十大致畸药物之列。重要的是,暴露于丙戊酸的妊娠并非以癫痫患者为主,而是以偏头痛等不太严重的疾病为主。在美国,只有含有托吡酯的减肥组合产品有强制性的怀孕预防计划,即所谓的风险评估和缓解策略(REMS),而预防胎儿接触所有三种单一成分产品依赖于产品标签上的信息和配药时提供的用药指南。由于担心严重疾病(如癫痫)患者获得药物的机会减少,抗惊厥药物避免了快速眼动反应,因此权衡了疾病不受控制造成的孕产妇伤害与不良妊娠或婴儿结局。然而,这三种药物的适应症范围越来越广,再加上日益严格的堕胎法可能不允许在胎儿意外暴露的情况下终止妊娠,可能需要重新评估REMS的利弊。在这里,我们认为需要正式的定量方法来评估孕产妇和婴儿的风险,考虑到孕产妇疾病、不良妊娠结局和对婴儿的致畸效应,以及抗惊厥药物的REMS对整体公共卫生的影响。鉴于丙戊酸的广泛使用、胎儿暴露的高风险以及对儿童健康的深远影响,我们预测REMS对公共卫生的影响将是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信