Methylene Blue-Guided Debridement in Preparation for Cardiac Device Reimplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study.

Q4 Medicine
Joel C Stroman, Alyssa Reinschmidt, Heather Karu
{"title":"Methylene Blue-Guided Debridement in Preparation for Cardiac Device Reimplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study.","authors":"Joel C Stroman, Alyssa Reinschmidt, Heather Karu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debridement of infected wounds is an essential component of wound healing. Surgical debridement is one option and is typically performed under direct visualization of the wound. It is carried out until healthy tissue is felt to be encountered by the surgeon. Methylene blue has been described as a visual aid in the debridement process, including in the setting of infected prostheses. This study aimed to compare wound healing and device reimplantation times between patients who underwent methylene blue-guided debridement or routine wound care of their infected cardiac device implant pockets. Evaluating differences in rates of recurrent infection following reimplantation was a secondary goal of the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified for inclusion using a CPT code-based data pull and manual chart review. They were separated into groups dependent upon whether they received routine wound care or methylene blue-guided debridement. Chart review was conducted to estimate the number of days from explantation to wound healing and device reimplantation, and any documentation of reinfection was also recorded. Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, and Chi-square tests were performed using jamovi.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To date, 13 patients have been included in the analysis. Methylene blue-guided debridement is associated with significantly faster time to wound healing (p = 0.011). A significant difference in the interval between explantation and reimplantation was noted, with those in the methylene blue group having shorter intervals (p = 0.036). Differences in reinfection rates were nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methylene blue-guided debridement appears to significantly improve time to wound healing and time to device reimplantation in patients who have undergone device explantation secondary to infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 4","pages":"171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Debridement of infected wounds is an essential component of wound healing. Surgical debridement is one option and is typically performed under direct visualization of the wound. It is carried out until healthy tissue is felt to be encountered by the surgeon. Methylene blue has been described as a visual aid in the debridement process, including in the setting of infected prostheses. This study aimed to compare wound healing and device reimplantation times between patients who underwent methylene blue-guided debridement or routine wound care of their infected cardiac device implant pockets. Evaluating differences in rates of recurrent infection following reimplantation was a secondary goal of the study.

Methods: Patients were identified for inclusion using a CPT code-based data pull and manual chart review. They were separated into groups dependent upon whether they received routine wound care or methylene blue-guided debridement. Chart review was conducted to estimate the number of days from explantation to wound healing and device reimplantation, and any documentation of reinfection was also recorded. Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, and Chi-square tests were performed using jamovi.

Results: To date, 13 patients have been included in the analysis. Methylene blue-guided debridement is associated with significantly faster time to wound healing (p = 0.011). A significant difference in the interval between explantation and reimplantation was noted, with those in the methylene blue group having shorter intervals (p = 0.036). Differences in reinfection rates were nonsignificant.

Conclusion: Methylene blue-guided debridement appears to significantly improve time to wound healing and time to device reimplantation in patients who have undergone device explantation secondary to infection.

亚甲基蓝引导下的清创为心脏装置再植做准备:一项回顾性队列先导研究。
简介:感染伤口的清创是伤口愈合的重要组成部分。手术清创是一种选择,通常在直接观察伤口的情况下进行。手术一直进行到外科医生感觉碰到健康组织为止。亚甲基蓝被描述为清创过程中的视觉辅助工具,包括在感染假体的设置中。本研究旨在比较接受亚甲蓝引导清创或对感染心脏装置植入袋进行常规伤口护理的患者的伤口愈合和装置再植时间。评估再植后复发感染率的差异是该研究的次要目标。方法:采用基于CPT代码的数据提取和手动图表回顾来确定纳入的患者。根据是否接受常规伤口护理或亚甲基蓝引导的清创术将患者分为两组。通过图表回顾来估计从移植到伤口愈合和器械再植的天数,并记录任何再感染的文件。使用jamovi进行Mann-Whitney U、Student’st和卡方检验。结果:迄今为止,13例患者已纳入分析。亚甲基蓝引导下的清创与更快的伤口愈合时间相关(p = 0.011)。外植和再植之间的间隔有显著差异,亚甲基蓝组的间隔更短(p = 0.036)。再感染率差异无统计学意义。结论:亚甲基蓝引导下的清创明显改善了继发感染患者的伤口愈合时间和器械再植时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信