Postpartum Balance and Kinesiophobia in Cesarean Delivery: Impact of Abdominal Fascial Scars.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yağmur Mengü, Emine Atici
{"title":"Postpartum Balance and Kinesiophobia in Cesarean Delivery: Impact of Abdominal Fascial Scars.","authors":"Yağmur Mengü, Emine Atici","doi":"10.1055/a-2629-6700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considering that the incisions made during cesarean delivery may damage subcutaneous tissue and fascia, and pelvic floor muscle contractions are effective in femoral head movements, it is hypothesized that the mode of delivery may have an impact on balance and kinesiophobia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cesarean delivery on balance, kinesiophobia, and body awareness.A total of 70 women participated in the study. Demographic and obstetric data of the participants were recorded. Thoracolumbar fascia was assessed using a goniometric platform, trunk flexibility with the Modified Schober test, static balance with the Flamingo Balance test, and dynamic balance with the Y Balance Test. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia was used to evaluate movement fear, and the Body Awareness Questionnaire was used to assess body awareness.No significant differences were found between cesarean and vaginal deliveries in terms of thoracolumbar fascia assessment, static balance, or dynamic balance measurements (p>0.05). In women who delivered vaginally, dynamic balance was observed to decrease with advancing age (p<0.05). Moreover, in vaginal deliveries, a shorter time since last birth was associated with improved anterior dynamic balance, while an increased number of deliveries was linked to impaired anterior dynamic balance (p<0.05). Regardless of the mode of delivery, all women experienced a decline in static balance and reduced anterior reach with increasing age. Additionally, an increased number of deliveries was associated with impaired static balance, and shorter postpartum duration was linked to decreased dynamic balance (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between vaginal and cesarean deliveries in terms of kinesiophobia (p>0.05). However, in women who delivered vaginally, body awareness decreased with age (p<0.05). In conclusion, the study found that cesarean scars had no adverse effects on balance, kinesiophobia, or body awareness. Nevertheless, further research focusing on balance is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2629-6700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering that the incisions made during cesarean delivery may damage subcutaneous tissue and fascia, and pelvic floor muscle contractions are effective in femoral head movements, it is hypothesized that the mode of delivery may have an impact on balance and kinesiophobia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cesarean delivery on balance, kinesiophobia, and body awareness.A total of 70 women participated in the study. Demographic and obstetric data of the participants were recorded. Thoracolumbar fascia was assessed using a goniometric platform, trunk flexibility with the Modified Schober test, static balance with the Flamingo Balance test, and dynamic balance with the Y Balance Test. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia was used to evaluate movement fear, and the Body Awareness Questionnaire was used to assess body awareness.No significant differences were found between cesarean and vaginal deliveries in terms of thoracolumbar fascia assessment, static balance, or dynamic balance measurements (p>0.05). In women who delivered vaginally, dynamic balance was observed to decrease with advancing age (p<0.05). Moreover, in vaginal deliveries, a shorter time since last birth was associated with improved anterior dynamic balance, while an increased number of deliveries was linked to impaired anterior dynamic balance (p<0.05). Regardless of the mode of delivery, all women experienced a decline in static balance and reduced anterior reach with increasing age. Additionally, an increased number of deliveries was associated with impaired static balance, and shorter postpartum duration was linked to decreased dynamic balance (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between vaginal and cesarean deliveries in terms of kinesiophobia (p>0.05). However, in women who delivered vaginally, body awareness decreased with age (p<0.05). In conclusion, the study found that cesarean scars had no adverse effects on balance, kinesiophobia, or body awareness. Nevertheless, further research focusing on balance is recommended.

剖宫产的产后平衡和运动恐惧症:腹部筋膜疤痕的影响。
考虑到剖宫产时的切口可能会损伤皮下组织和筋膜,而盆底肌收缩在股骨头运动中是有效的,假设分娩方式可能对平衡和运动恐惧症有影响。本研究旨在探讨剖宫产对平衡、运动恐惧症和身体意识的影响。共有70名女性参与了这项研究。记录了参与者的人口统计和产科数据。胸腰筋膜采用测量平台评估,躯干柔韧性采用改良Schober测试,静态平衡采用Flamingo平衡测试,动态平衡采用Y平衡测试。采用坦帕运动恐惧量表评估运动恐惧,采用身体意识问卷评估身体意识。剖宫产和阴道分娩在胸腰筋膜评估、静态平衡或动态平衡测量方面无显著差异(p < 0.05)。顺产妇女的动态平衡随着年龄的增长而下降(p0.05)。然而,在阴道分娩的女性中,身体意识随着年龄的增长而下降
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信