Fractal analysis evaluation of regenerated bone in grafted and graftless maxillary sinus elevation procedures.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Quintessence international Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b6309977

Ayşe Gül Öner Talmaç, Alaettin Koç, Ahmet Cemil Talmaç, Levent Ciğerim, Metin Çalışır, Emre Gürkan Eroğlu

{"title":"Fractal analysis evaluation of regenerated bone in grafted and graftless maxillary sinus elevation procedures.","authors":"Ayşe Gül Öner Talmaç, Alaettin Koç, Ahmet Cemil Talmaç, Levent Ciğerim, Metin Çalışır, Emre Gürkan Eroğlu","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6309977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively calculate and compare the changes in regenerated bone around the implant in graftless and grafted sinus lift procedures using fractal dimension (FD) analysis, and to provide an additional criterion for clinical preference.Methods and materials: The study included 65 patients (29 graftless and 36 grafted) at the Faculty of Dentistry in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Graftless and grafted sinus lift techniques were compared in terms of FD and bone density (BD) on panoramic radiographs. Student's t-test was used to compare the mean values of FD and BD in patients with graftless and grafted sinus lifting. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BD data with age. Statistical significance was accepted at a p < .05.Results: The FD and BD were not statistically significant between two groups (p>.05). The FD and BD parameters were higher in men for both sinus lift techniques.Conclusions: This study has shown that the graftless and grafted sinus lift techniques have similar FD and BD outcomes. Therefore, we conclude that the graftless technique is preferable for maxillary sinus lift because of its relatively simple technique.","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6309977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively calculate and compare the changes in regenerated bone around the implant in graftless and grafted sinus lift procedures using fractal dimension (FD) analysis, and to provide an additional criterion for clinical preference.

Methods and materials: The study included 65 patients (29 graftless and 36 grafted) at the Faculty of Dentistry in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Graftless and grafted sinus lift techniques were compared in terms of FD and bone density (BD) on panoramic radiographs. Student's t-test was used to compare the mean values of FD and BD in patients with graftless and grafted sinus lifting. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation of FD and BD data with age. Statistical significance was accepted at a p < .05.

Results: The FD and BD were not statistically significant between two groups (p>.05). The FD and BD parameters were higher in men for both sinus lift techniques.

Conclusions: This study has shown that the graftless and grafted sinus lift techniques have similar FD and BD outcomes. Therefore, we conclude that the graftless technique is preferable for maxillary sinus lift because of its relatively simple technique.

查看原文本刊更多论文

分形分析评价植骨和无植骨上颌窦提升术再生骨。

目的：利用分形维数（FD）分析定量计算和比较无瓣和有瓣鼻窦提升术中种植体周围再生骨的变化，为临床选择提供附加标准。方法和材料：本研究纳入了牙科学院的65例患者（29例未移植，36例移植）。比较无骨和有骨鼻窦提升技术在全景x线片上的FD和骨密度（BD）。采用学生t检验比较无移植物和移植物窦抬高患者FD和BD的平均值。采用Pearson相关系数分析FD和BD数据与年龄的相关性。差异有统计学意义，p < 0.05。结果：两组FD、BD差异无统计学意义（p < 0.05）。两种鼻窦提升技术的男性FD和BD参数均较高。结论：本研究表明，无移植物和移植物窦提升技术具有相似的FD和BD结果。因此，我们认为无移植物技术是上颌窦提升术的首选技术，因为它的技术相对简单。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.