A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for breast cancer patients who are undertaking adjuvant endocrine therapy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rila Su, Claire Snyder, Albert W Wu, Alden L Gross, Jiafu Ji, Jiaming Zhang, Laura Morlock
{"title":"A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for breast cancer patients who are undertaking adjuvant endocrine therapy.","authors":"Rila Su, Claire Snyder, Albert W Wu, Alden L Gross, Jiafu Ji, Jiaming Zhang, Laura Morlock","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04004-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer among women, with hormone receptor-positive BC making up approximately 70% of cases. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy (AET) is critical in reducing recurrence in this patient population. Still, it often leads to side effects that negatively impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to assess HRQoL, but there is inconsistency in the instruments used to evaluate the impact of AET on BC patients. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate PROMs that assess HRQoL in BC patients undergoing AET, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2007 and 2023. Studies that developed and validated PROMs for BC patients on AET were included. The measurement properties of each PROM were appraised following COSMIN guidelines, and their relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 24 studies assessing six PROMs. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Breast Cancer45 (EORTC BR45) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) demonstrated sufficient content validity and covered the majority of AET-related symptoms. Both instruments were rated highly for structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability. FACT-ES also demonstrated strong responsiveness to treatment-related changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EORTC BR45 and FACT-ES are the most suitable PROMs for assessing HRQoL in BC patients undergoing AET due to their robust psychometric properties and comprehensive coverage of AET-related symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04004-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer among women, with hormone receptor-positive BC making up approximately 70% of cases. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy (AET) is critical in reducing recurrence in this patient population. Still, it often leads to side effects that negatively impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to assess HRQoL, but there is inconsistency in the instruments used to evaluate the impact of AET on BC patients. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate PROMs that assess HRQoL in BC patients undergoing AET, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2007 and 2023. Studies that developed and validated PROMs for BC patients on AET were included. The measurement properties of each PROM were appraised following COSMIN guidelines, and their relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility were assessed.

Results: The review included 24 studies assessing six PROMs. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Breast Cancer45 (EORTC BR45) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) demonstrated sufficient content validity and covered the majority of AET-related symptoms. Both instruments were rated highly for structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability. FACT-ES also demonstrated strong responsiveness to treatment-related changes.

Conclusions: EORTC BR45 and FACT-ES are the most suitable PROMs for assessing HRQoL in BC patients undergoing AET due to their robust psychometric properties and comprehensive coverage of AET-related symptoms.

对接受辅助内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)进行评估的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的系统评价。
目的:乳腺癌(BC)是女性中最常见的癌症,激素受体阳性的乳腺癌约占70%。辅助内分泌治疗(AET)是减少这类患者复发的关键。尽管如此,它往往会导致副作用,对患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)产生负面影响。患者报告结果测量(PROMs)被广泛用于评估HRQoL,但用于评估AET对BC患者影响的仪器存在不一致。本系统综述旨在使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,识别和评估评估接受AET的BC患者HRQoL的PROMs。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,检索2007年至2023年间发表的研究。研究开发并验证了PROMs对BC患者AET的疗效。每个PROM的测量特性按照COSMIN指南进行评估,并评估其相关性,全面性和可理解性。结果:本综述纳入了24项研究,评估了6个PROMs。欧洲癌症-乳腺癌研究和治疗组织45 (EORTC BR45)和癌症治疗-内分泌症状功能评估(FACT-ES)证明了足够的内容效度,涵盖了大多数aet相关症状。这两种工具在结构效度、内部一致性、跨文化效度和信度方面都获得了很高的评价。FACT-ES还显示出对治疗相关变化的强烈反应。结论:EORTC BR45和FACT-ES是评估接受AET的BC患者HRQoL的最合适的PROMs,因为它们具有强大的心理测量特性和全面的AET相关症状覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信