Assessment of ventilation heterogeneity in severe asthma using phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Chuan T Foo, David Langton, Graham M Donovan, Bruce R Thompson, Peter B Noble, Francis Thien
{"title":"Assessment of ventilation heterogeneity in severe asthma using phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Chuan T Foo, David Langton, Graham M Donovan, Bruce R Thompson, Peter B Noble, Francis Thien","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark of asthma. This study examines the feasibility of phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging (PREFUL MRI) in the evaluation of ventilation heterogeneity in severe asthma, its response to bronchodilator, and correlation with spirometry. Twenty-three patients with severe asthma and seven healthy volunteers completed PREFUL MRI and spirometry pre and post-bronchodilator. Ventilation heterogeneity was assessed using ventilation defect percentages (VDP) for regional ventilation (RVent) and flow-volume loop cross-correlation (FVL), interquartile distance (IQD), and inhomogeneity index (IHI). Patients exhibited a significantly higher pre-bronchodilator VDP<sub>RVent</sub> (19.9 ± 14.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.9%, p < 0.001), VDP<sub>FVL</sub> (21.6 ± 15.9 vs. 1.7 ± 2.1%, p < 0.001), IQD (0.60 ± 0.25 vs. 0.30 ± 0.06, p < 0.001), and IHI (0.34 ± 0.12 vs. 0.18 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) compared to healthy volunteers. Post-bronchodilator, VDP<sub>RVent</sub> (14.7 ± 12.5 vs. 19.9 ± 14.0%, p = 0.02), IQD (0.51 ± 0.20 vs. 0.60 ± 0.25, p = 0.02), and IHI (0.30 ± 0.11 vs. 0.34 ± 0.12, p = 0.02) decreased significantly in patients but remained significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. Significant correlations were observed between pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and VDP<sub>RVent</sub> (ρ = -0.61, p < 0.001), VDP<sub>FVL</sub> (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.001), IQD (ρ = -0.57, p = <0.001), and IHI (ρ = -0.60, p < 0.001). PREFUL MRI derived markers of ventilation heterogeneity are worse in patients with asthma, improve post-bronchodilator, and correlate with the severity of airflow obstruction. These findings support the role of PREFUL MRI in assessing ventilation heterogeneity in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 12","pages":"e70423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark of asthma. This study examines the feasibility of phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging (PREFUL MRI) in the evaluation of ventilation heterogeneity in severe asthma, its response to bronchodilator, and correlation with spirometry. Twenty-three patients with severe asthma and seven healthy volunteers completed PREFUL MRI and spirometry pre and post-bronchodilator. Ventilation heterogeneity was assessed using ventilation defect percentages (VDP) for regional ventilation (RVent) and flow-volume loop cross-correlation (FVL), interquartile distance (IQD), and inhomogeneity index (IHI). Patients exhibited a significantly higher pre-bronchodilator VDPRVent (19.9 ± 14.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.9%, p < 0.001), VDPFVL (21.6 ± 15.9 vs. 1.7 ± 2.1%, p < 0.001), IQD (0.60 ± 0.25 vs. 0.30 ± 0.06, p < 0.001), and IHI (0.34 ± 0.12 vs. 0.18 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) compared to healthy volunteers. Post-bronchodilator, VDPRVent (14.7 ± 12.5 vs. 19.9 ± 14.0%, p = 0.02), IQD (0.51 ± 0.20 vs. 0.60 ± 0.25, p = 0.02), and IHI (0.30 ± 0.11 vs. 0.34 ± 0.12, p = 0.02) decreased significantly in patients but remained significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. Significant correlations were observed between pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and VDPRVent (ρ = -0.61, p < 0.001), VDPFVL (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.001), IQD (ρ = -0.57, p = <0.001), and IHI (ρ = -0.60, p < 0.001). PREFUL MRI derived markers of ventilation heterogeneity are worse in patients with asthma, improve post-bronchodilator, and correlate with the severity of airflow obstruction. These findings support the role of PREFUL MRI in assessing ventilation heterogeneity in asthma.

应用相位分辨功能肺磁共振成像评估重度哮喘患者通气异质性。
通气不均匀性是哮喘的标志。本研究探讨了相分辨功能肺磁共振成像(PREFUL MRI)在评估严重哮喘患者通气异质性、对支气管扩张剂的反应以及与肺活量测定的相关性方面的可行性。23名重症哮喘患者和7名健康志愿者在支气管扩张剂前后完成了PREFUL MRI和肺活量测定。采用区域通风(RVent)的通风缺陷百分比(VDP)、流量-容积环相互关联(FVL)、四分位数距离(IQD)和不均匀性指数(IHI)评估通风异质性。患者支气管扩张前VDPRVent(19.9±14.0 vs. 1.9±1.9%)、FVL(21.6±15.9 vs. 1.7±2.1%)、RVent(14.7±12.5 vs. 19.9±14.0%,p = 0.02)、IQD(0.51±0.20 vs. 0.60±0.25,p = 0.02)和IHI(0.30±0.11 vs. 0.34±0.12,p = 0.02)均显著降低,但仍显著高于健康志愿者。支气管扩张剂前FEV1和VDPRVent之间存在显著相关性(ρ = -0.61, p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信